@article{ green_religion_2013,
  title = {Religion and medical ethics},
  volume = {118},
  issn = {0072-9752},
  doi = {10.1016/B978-0-444-53501-6.00006-8},
  abstract = {Religious traditions of medical ethics tend to differ from more secular approaches by stressing limitations on autonomous decision-making, by more positively valuing the experience of suffering, and by drawing on beliefs and values that go beyond empiric verification. I trace the impact of these differences for some of the world's great religious traditions with respect to four issues: (1) religious conscientious objection to medical treatments; (2) end-of life decision-making, including euthanasia, physician-assisted suicide, and the withholding or withdrawing of life-sustaining treatments; (3) definitions of moral personhood (defining life's beginning and end); and (4) human sexuality.},
  language = {eng},
  journal = {Handbook of clinical neurology},
  author = {Green, Ronald M},
  year = {2013},
  pmid = {24182368},
  keywords = {Ethics, Medical, Humans, Religion and Medicine},
  pages = {79--89}
}

{"_id":"PDFjwA6noihEx5fZj","authorIDs":[],"author_short":["Green","M, R."],"bibbaseid":"green-m-religionandmedicalethics-2013","bibdata":{"abstract":"Religious traditions of medical ethics tend to differ from more secular approaches by stressing limitations on autonomous decision-making, by more positively valuing the experience of suffering, and by drawing on beliefs and values that go beyond empiric verification. I trace the impact of these differences for some of the world's great religious traditions with respect to four issues: (1) religious conscientious objection to medical treatments; (2) end-of life decision-making, including euthanasia, physician-assisted suicide, and the withholding or withdrawing of life-sustaining treatments; (3) definitions of moral personhood (defining life's beginning and end); and (4) human sexuality.","author":["Green","M, Ronald"],"author_short":["Green","M, R."],"bibtex":"@article{ green_religion_2013,\n title = {Religion and medical ethics},\n volume = {118},\n issn = {0072-9752},\n doi = {10.1016/B978-0-444-53501-6.00006-8},\n abstract = {Religious traditions of medical ethics tend to differ from more secular approaches by stressing limitations on autonomous decision-making, by more positively valuing the experience of suffering, and by drawing on beliefs and values that go beyond empiric verification. I trace the impact of these differences for some of the world's great religious traditions with respect to four issues: (1) religious conscientious objection to medical treatments; (2) end-of life decision-making, including euthanasia, physician-assisted suicide, and the withholding or withdrawing of life-sustaining treatments; (3) definitions of moral personhood (defining life's beginning and end); and (4) human sexuality.},\n language = {eng},\n journal = {Handbook of clinical neurology},\n author = {Green, Ronald M},\n year = {2013},\n pmid = {24182368},\n keywords = {Ethics, Medical, Humans, Religion and Medicine},\n pages = {79--89}\n}","bibtype":"article","doi":"10.1016/B978-0-444-53501-6.00006-8","id":"green_religion_2013","issn":"0072-9752","journal":"Handbook of clinical neurology","key":"green_religion_2013","keywords":"Ethics, Medical, Humans, Religion and Medicine","language":"eng","pages":"79--89","pmid":"24182368","title":"Religion and medical ethics","type":"article","volume":"118","year":"2013","bibbaseid":"green-m-religionandmedicalethics-2013","role":"author","urls":{},"keyword":["Ethics","Medical","Humans","Religion and Medicine"],"downloads":0,"html":""},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://oncourse.iu.edu/access/content/user/jdodell/Public%20Folder/colib.bib","creationDate":"2014-12-11T22:13:22.382Z","downloads":0,"keywords":["ethics","medical","humans","religion and medicine"],"search_terms":["religion","medical","ethics","green","m"],"title":"Religion and medical ethics","year":2013,"dataSources":["jzatBN8frdsbSEMvG"]}