@article{greenwood_social_2013,
	title = {Social accounting as stakeholder knowledge appropriation},
	volume = {17},
	issn = {1572-963X},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-011-9208-z},
	doi = {10.1007/s10997-011-9208-z},
	abstract = {Heeding the call for socio-political explorations of the social accounting project, we use the analytical lens of knowledge appropriation to explore power and contest in social auditing. We develop a knowledge appropriation model comprising three stages: knowledge creation, knowledge generation and outcome distribution, which we then use to analyze an exemplar case. We argue that, despite asymmetries of power and managerial prerogative, deficient stakeholder involvement in the creation and distribution stages renders social auditing ineffective for governance as either a stakeholder account or a strategic management system. We conclude that embedded stakeholder involvement in knowledge creation processes is essential for social auditing to be effective as corporate governance.},
	language = {en},
	number = {3},
	urldate = {2018-12-23},
	journal = {Journal of Management \& Governance},
	author = {Greenwood, Michelle and Kamoche, Ken},
	month = aug,
	year = {2013},
	keywords = {Governance, Knowledge appropriation, Management control, Social accounting, Stakeholders, The Body Shop},
	pages = {723--743},
}

{"_id":"MhZXtAkkasdqHpdcP","bibbaseid":"greenwood-kamoche-socialaccountingasstakeholderknowledgeappropriation-2013","author_short":["Greenwood, M.","Kamoche, K."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Social accounting as stakeholder knowledge appropriation","volume":"17","issn":"1572-963X","url":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-011-9208-z","doi":"10.1007/s10997-011-9208-z","abstract":"Heeding the call for socio-political explorations of the social accounting project, we use the analytical lens of knowledge appropriation to explore power and contest in social auditing. We develop a knowledge appropriation model comprising three stages: knowledge creation, knowledge generation and outcome distribution, which we then use to analyze an exemplar case. We argue that, despite asymmetries of power and managerial prerogative, deficient stakeholder involvement in the creation and distribution stages renders social auditing ineffective for governance as either a stakeholder account or a strategic management system. We conclude that embedded stakeholder involvement in knowledge creation processes is essential for social auditing to be effective as corporate governance.","language":"en","number":"3","urldate":"2018-12-23","journal":"Journal of Management & Governance","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Greenwood"],"firstnames":["Michelle"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Kamoche"],"firstnames":["Ken"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"August","year":"2013","keywords":"Governance, Knowledge appropriation, Management control, Social accounting, Stakeholders, The Body Shop","pages":"723–743","bibtex":"@article{greenwood_social_2013,\n\ttitle = {Social accounting as stakeholder knowledge appropriation},\n\tvolume = {17},\n\tissn = {1572-963X},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-011-9208-z},\n\tdoi = {10.1007/s10997-011-9208-z},\n\tabstract = {Heeding the call for socio-political explorations of the social accounting project, we use the analytical lens of knowledge appropriation to explore power and contest in social auditing. We develop a knowledge appropriation model comprising three stages: knowledge creation, knowledge generation and outcome distribution, which we then use to analyze an exemplar case. We argue that, despite asymmetries of power and managerial prerogative, deficient stakeholder involvement in the creation and distribution stages renders social auditing ineffective for governance as either a stakeholder account or a strategic management system. We conclude that embedded stakeholder involvement in knowledge creation processes is essential for social auditing to be effective as corporate governance.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {3},\n\turldate = {2018-12-23},\n\tjournal = {Journal of Management \\& Governance},\n\tauthor = {Greenwood, Michelle and Kamoche, Ken},\n\tmonth = aug,\n\tyear = {2013},\n\tkeywords = {Governance, Knowledge appropriation, Management control, Social accounting, Stakeholders, The Body Shop},\n\tpages = {723--743},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Greenwood, M.","Kamoche, K."],"key":"greenwood_social_2013-1-1","id":"greenwood_social_2013-1-1","bibbaseid":"greenwood-kamoche-socialaccountingasstakeholderknowledgeappropriation-2013","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-011-9208-z"},"keyword":["Governance","Knowledge appropriation","Management control","Social accounting","Stakeholders","The Body Shop"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero/nigelcox1","dataSources":["BtzEXLT8hmCpSLapT"],"keywords":["governance","knowledge appropriation","management control","social accounting","stakeholders","the body shop"],"search_terms":["social","accounting","stakeholder","knowledge","appropriation","greenwood","kamoche"],"title":"Social accounting as stakeholder knowledge appropriation","year":2013}