@article{
 title = {Solar Energy Development and Aquatic Ecosystems in the Southwestern United States: Potential Impacts, Mitigation, and Research Needs},
 type = {article},
 year = {2014},
 identifiers = {[object Object]},
 keywords = {Aquatic ecology,Environmental impacts,Renewable energy,Solar energy,Water use,Watershed management},
 pages = {244-256},
 volume = {55},
 id = {f9b9ae22-67bb-30af-8ea1-6ee3cb647762},
 created = {2017-04-04T15:31:33.469Z},
 file_attached = {true},
 profile_id = {39115262-6911-31a1-9f61-8e73704abb89},
 group_id = {3addd0f7-d578-34d3-be80-24022cc062a1},
 last_modified = {2017-04-04T15:37:18.526Z},
 read = {false},
 starred = {false},
 authored = {false},
 confirmed = {true},
 hidden = {false},
 folder_uuids = {fb673d92-6ff2-4b97-9b22-a6d3f2a50500},
 private_publication = {false},
 abstract = {The cumulative impacts of utility-scale solar energy facilities on aquatic ecosystems in the Southwestern United States are of concern, considering the many existing regional anthropogenic stressors. We review the potential impacts of solar energy development on aquatic habitat and biota. The greatest potential for impacts is related to the loss, fragmentation, or prolonged drying of ephemeral water bodies and drainage networks resulting from the loss of desert washes within the construction footprint of the facility. Groundwater-dependent aquatic habitat may also be affected by operational groundwater withdrawal in the case of water-intensive solar technologies. Solar panels have also been found to attract aquatic insects and water- birds, potentially resulting in mortality. Avoiding con- struction activity near perennial and intermittent surface waters is the primary means of reducing impacts on aquatic habitats, followed by measures to minimize erosion, sedi- mentation, and contaminant inputs into waterways. Cur- rently, significant data gaps make solar facility impact assessment and mitigation more difficult. Examples include the need for more regional and site-specific studies of surface–groundwater connectivity, more detailed maps of regional stream networks and riparian vegetation corridors,as well as surveys of the aquatic communities inhabiting ephemeral streams. In addition, because they often lack regulatory protection, there is also a need to develop val- uation criteria for ephemeral waters based on their eco- logical and hydrologic function within the landscape. By addressing these research needs, we can achieve the goal of greater reliance on solar energy, while at the same time minimizing impacts on desert ecosystems.},
 bibtype = {article},
 author = {Grippo, Mark and Hayse, John W. and O’Connor, Ben L.},
 journal = {Environmental Management},
 number = {1}
}

{"_id":"534E6e5fuFZFDXhDK","bibbaseid":"grippo-hayse-oconnor-solarenergydevelopmentandaquaticecosystemsinthesouthwesternunitedstatespotentialimpactsmitigationandresearchneeds-2014","authorIDs":[],"author_short":["Grippo, M.","Hayse, J., W.","O’Connor, B., L."],"bibdata":{"title":"Solar Energy Development and Aquatic Ecosystems in the Southwestern United States: Potential Impacts, Mitigation, and Research Needs","type":"article","year":"2014","identifiers":"[object Object]","keywords":"Aquatic ecology,Environmental impacts,Renewable energy,Solar energy,Water use,Watershed management","pages":"244-256","volume":"55","id":"f9b9ae22-67bb-30af-8ea1-6ee3cb647762","created":"2017-04-04T15:31:33.469Z","file_attached":"true","profile_id":"39115262-6911-31a1-9f61-8e73704abb89","group_id":"3addd0f7-d578-34d3-be80-24022cc062a1","last_modified":"2017-04-04T15:37:18.526Z","read":false,"starred":false,"authored":false,"confirmed":"true","hidden":false,"folder_uuids":"fb673d92-6ff2-4b97-9b22-a6d3f2a50500","private_publication":false,"abstract":"The cumulative impacts of utility-scale solar energy facilities on aquatic ecosystems in the Southwestern United States are of concern, considering the many existing regional anthropogenic stressors. We review the potential impacts of solar energy development on aquatic habitat and biota. The greatest potential for impacts is related to the loss, fragmentation, or prolonged drying of ephemeral water bodies and drainage networks resulting from the loss of desert washes within the construction footprint of the facility. Groundwater-dependent aquatic habitat may also be affected by operational groundwater withdrawal in the case of water-intensive solar technologies. Solar panels have also been found to attract aquatic insects and water- birds, potentially resulting in mortality. Avoiding con- struction activity near perennial and intermittent surface waters is the primary means of reducing impacts on aquatic habitats, followed by measures to minimize erosion, sedi- mentation, and contaminant inputs into waterways. Cur- rently, significant data gaps make solar facility impact assessment and mitigation more difficult. Examples include the need for more regional and site-specific studies of surface–groundwater connectivity, more detailed maps of regional stream networks and riparian vegetation corridors,as well as surveys of the aquatic communities inhabiting ephemeral streams. In addition, because they often lack regulatory protection, there is also a need to develop val- uation criteria for ephemeral waters based on their eco- logical and hydrologic function within the landscape. By addressing these research needs, we can achieve the goal of greater reliance on solar energy, while at the same time minimizing impacts on desert ecosystems.","bibtype":"article","author":"Grippo, Mark and Hayse, John W. and O’Connor, Ben L.","journal":"Environmental Management","number":"1","bibtex":"@article{\n title = {Solar Energy Development and Aquatic Ecosystems in the Southwestern United States: Potential Impacts, Mitigation, and Research Needs},\n type = {article},\n year = {2014},\n identifiers = {[object Object]},\n keywords = {Aquatic ecology,Environmental impacts,Renewable energy,Solar energy,Water use,Watershed management},\n pages = {244-256},\n volume = {55},\n id = {f9b9ae22-67bb-30af-8ea1-6ee3cb647762},\n created = {2017-04-04T15:31:33.469Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {39115262-6911-31a1-9f61-8e73704abb89},\n group_id = {3addd0f7-d578-34d3-be80-24022cc062a1},\n last_modified = {2017-04-04T15:37:18.526Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n folder_uuids = {fb673d92-6ff2-4b97-9b22-a6d3f2a50500},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {The cumulative impacts of utility-scale solar energy facilities on aquatic ecosystems in the Southwestern United States are of concern, considering the many existing regional anthropogenic stressors. We review the potential impacts of solar energy development on aquatic habitat and biota. The greatest potential for impacts is related to the loss, fragmentation, or prolonged drying of ephemeral water bodies and drainage networks resulting from the loss of desert washes within the construction footprint of the facility. Groundwater-dependent aquatic habitat may also be affected by operational groundwater withdrawal in the case of water-intensive solar technologies. Solar panels have also been found to attract aquatic insects and water- birds, potentially resulting in mortality. Avoiding con- struction activity near perennial and intermittent surface waters is the primary means of reducing impacts on aquatic habitats, followed by measures to minimize erosion, sedi- mentation, and contaminant inputs into waterways. Cur- rently, significant data gaps make solar facility impact assessment and mitigation more difficult. Examples include the need for more regional and site-specific studies of surface–groundwater connectivity, more detailed maps of regional stream networks and riparian vegetation corridors,as well as surveys of the aquatic communities inhabiting ephemeral streams. In addition, because they often lack regulatory protection, there is also a need to develop val- uation criteria for ephemeral waters based on their eco- logical and hydrologic function within the landscape. By addressing these research needs, we can achieve the goal of greater reliance on solar energy, while at the same time minimizing impacts on desert ecosystems.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Grippo, Mark and Hayse, John W. and O’Connor, Ben L.},\n journal = {Environmental Management},\n number = {1}\n}","author_short":["Grippo, M.","Hayse, J., W.","O’Connor, B., L."],"bibbaseid":"grippo-hayse-oconnor-solarenergydevelopmentandaquaticecosystemsinthesouthwesternunitedstatespotentialimpactsmitigationandresearchneeds-2014","role":"author","urls":{},"keyword":["Aquatic ecology","Environmental impacts","Renewable energy","Solar energy","Water use","Watershed management"],"downloads":0},"bibtype":"article","creationDate":"2020-12-22T22:02:16.303Z","downloads":0,"keywords":["aquatic ecology","environmental impacts","renewable energy","solar energy","water use","watershed management"],"search_terms":["solar","energy","development","aquatic","ecosystems","southwestern","united","states","potential","impacts","mitigation","research","needs","grippo","hayse","o’connor"],"title":"Solar Energy Development and Aquatic Ecosystems in the Southwestern United States: Potential Impacts, Mitigation, and Research Needs","year":2014}