Pilot randomized controlled trial on early and late remote ischemic preconditioning prior to complex cardiac surgery in young infants. Guerra G.G., Joffe A.R., Seal R., Phillipos E., Wong M., Moez E.K., Dinu I.A., Duff J.P., Ross D., Rebeyka I., & Robertson C.M.T. 2017. Paper abstract bibtex Background: Remote ischemic preconditioning involves providing a brief ischemia-reperfusion event to a tissue to create subsequent protection from a more severe ischemia-reperfusion event to a different tissue/organ. The few pediatric remote ischemic preconditioning studies in the literature show conflicting results. Aim: We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial to determine the feasibility of conducting a larger trial and to gather provisional data on the effect of early and late remote ischemic preconditioning on outcomes of infants after surgery for congenital heart disease. Methods: This single-center, double-blind randomized controlled trial of remote ischemic preconditioning vs control (sham-remote ischemic preconditioning) in young infants going for surgery for congenital heart disease at the Stollery Children's Hospital. Remote ischemic preconditioning was performed at 24-48 h preoperatively and immediately prior to cardiopulmonary bypass. Remote ischemic preconditioning stimulus was performed with blood pressure cuffs around the thighs. Primary outcomes were feasibility and peak blood lactate level on day 1 postoperatively. Results: Fifty-two patients were randomized but seven patients became ineligible after randomization leaving 45 patients included in the study. In the included patients, 7 (15%) had protocol deviations (five infants did not have the preoperative intervention and two did not receive the intervention in the operating room). From a comfort point of view, only one subject in the control group and two in the Remote ischemic preconditioning group received sedation during the preoperative intervention. There were no study-related adverse events and no complications to the limbs subjected to preconditioning. There were no significant differences between the Remote ischemic preconditioning group and the control group in the highest blood lactate level on day 1 postoperatively (mean difference, 1.28; 95%CI, -0.22, 2.78; P-value = 0.093). Conclusion: In infants who underwent surgery for congenital heart disease, our pilot randomized controlled trial on early and late remote ischemic preconditioning proved to be feasible but did not find any significant difference in acute outcomes. A larger trial may be necessary. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
@misc{guerra_g.g._pilot_2017,
title = {Pilot randomized controlled trial on early and late remote ischemic preconditioning prior to complex cardiac surgery in young infants},
url = {http://www.blackwell-science.com/pan},
abstract = {Background: Remote ischemic preconditioning involves providing a brief ischemia-reperfusion event to a tissue to create subsequent protection from a more severe ischemia-reperfusion event to a different tissue/organ. The few pediatric remote ischemic preconditioning studies in the literature show conflicting results. Aim: We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial to determine the feasibility of conducting a larger trial and to gather provisional data on the effect of early and late remote ischemic preconditioning on outcomes of infants after surgery for congenital heart disease. Methods: This single-center, double-blind randomized controlled trial of remote ischemic preconditioning vs control (sham-remote ischemic preconditioning) in young infants going for surgery for congenital heart disease at the Stollery Children's Hospital. Remote ischemic preconditioning was performed at 24-48 h preoperatively and immediately prior to cardiopulmonary bypass. Remote ischemic preconditioning stimulus was performed with blood pressure cuffs around the thighs. Primary outcomes were feasibility and peak blood lactate level on day 1 postoperatively. Results: Fifty-two patients were randomized but seven patients became ineligible after randomization leaving 45 patients included in the study. In the included patients, 7 (15\%) had protocol deviations (five infants did not have the preoperative intervention and two did not receive the intervention in the operating room). From a comfort point of view, only one subject in the control group and two in the Remote ischemic preconditioning group received sedation during the preoperative intervention. There were no study-related adverse events and no complications to the limbs subjected to preconditioning. There were no significant differences between the Remote ischemic preconditioning group and the control group in the highest blood lactate level on day 1 postoperatively (mean difference, 1.28; 95\%CI, -0.22, 2.78; P-value = 0.093). Conclusion: In infants who underwent surgery for congenital heart disease, our pilot randomized controlled trial on early and late remote ischemic preconditioning proved to be feasible but did not find any significant difference in acute outcomes. A larger trial may be necessary. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley \& Sons Ltd},
journal = {Paediatric Anaesthesia},
author = {{Guerra G.G.} and {Joffe A.R.} and {Seal R.} and {Phillipos E.} and {Wong M.} and {Moez E.K.} and {Dinu I.A.} and {Duff J.P.} and {Ross D.} and {Rebeyka I.} and {Robertson C.M.T.}},
year = {2017},
keywords = {*congenital heart disease, *heart surgery, *intensive care, *ischemic preconditioning, *reperfusion injury, Child, adverse drug reaction, blood pressure cuff, cardiopulmonary bypass, clinical trial, comfort, complication, control group, controlled clinical trial, controlled study, feasibility study, human, human tissue, infant, lactate blood level, major clinical study, operating room, randomization, randomized controlled trial, sedation, side effect, statistical significance, stimulus, surgery, thigh, visually impaired person}
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"rsmJdWPr7rksuPcw5","bibbaseid":"guerragg-joffear-sealr-phillipose-wongm-moezek-dinuia-duffjp-etal-pilotrandomizedcontrolledtrialonearlyandlateremoteischemicpreconditioningpriortocomplexcardiacsurgeryinyounginfants-2017","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2017-05-12T20:20:58.296Z","title":"Pilot randomized controlled trial on early and late remote ischemic preconditioning prior to complex cardiac surgery in young infants","author_short":["Guerra G.G.","Joffe A.R.","Seal R.","Phillipos E.","Wong M.","Moez E.K.","Dinu I.A.","Duff J.P.","Ross D.","Rebeyka I.","Robertson C.M.T."],"year":2017,"bibtype":"misc","biburl":"http://bibbase.org/zotero/gxu917","bibdata":{"bibtype":"misc","type":"misc","title":"Pilot randomized controlled trial on early and late remote ischemic preconditioning prior to complex cardiac surgery in young infants","url":"http://www.blackwell-science.com/pan","abstract":"Background: Remote ischemic preconditioning involves providing a brief ischemia-reperfusion event to a tissue to create subsequent protection from a more severe ischemia-reperfusion event to a different tissue/organ. The few pediatric remote ischemic preconditioning studies in the literature show conflicting results. Aim: We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial to determine the feasibility of conducting a larger trial and to gather provisional data on the effect of early and late remote ischemic preconditioning on outcomes of infants after surgery for congenital heart disease. Methods: This single-center, double-blind randomized controlled trial of remote ischemic preconditioning vs control (sham-remote ischemic preconditioning) in young infants going for surgery for congenital heart disease at the Stollery Children's Hospital. Remote ischemic preconditioning was performed at 24-48 h preoperatively and immediately prior to cardiopulmonary bypass. Remote ischemic preconditioning stimulus was performed with blood pressure cuffs around the thighs. Primary outcomes were feasibility and peak blood lactate level on day 1 postoperatively. Results: Fifty-two patients were randomized but seven patients became ineligible after randomization leaving 45 patients included in the study. In the included patients, 7 (15%) had protocol deviations (five infants did not have the preoperative intervention and two did not receive the intervention in the operating room). From a comfort point of view, only one subject in the control group and two in the Remote ischemic preconditioning group received sedation during the preoperative intervention. There were no study-related adverse events and no complications to the limbs subjected to preconditioning. There were no significant differences between the Remote ischemic preconditioning group and the control group in the highest blood lactate level on day 1 postoperatively (mean difference, 1.28; 95%CI, -0.22, 2.78; P-value = 0.093). Conclusion: In infants who underwent surgery for congenital heart disease, our pilot randomized controlled trial on early and late remote ischemic preconditioning proved to be feasible but did not find any significant difference in acute outcomes. A larger trial may be necessary. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd","journal":"Paediatric Anaesthesia","author":[{"firstnames":[],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Guerra G.G."],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":[],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Joffe A.R."],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":[],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Seal R."],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":[],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Phillipos E."],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":[],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Wong M."],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":[],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Moez E.K."],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":[],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Dinu I.A."],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":[],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Duff J.P."],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":[],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Ross D."],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":[],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Rebeyka I."],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":[],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Robertson C.M.T."],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"2017","keywords":"*congenital heart disease, *heart surgery, *intensive care, *ischemic preconditioning, *reperfusion injury, Child, adverse drug reaction, blood pressure cuff, cardiopulmonary bypass, clinical trial, comfort, complication, control group, controlled clinical trial, controlled study, feasibility study, human, human tissue, infant, lactate blood level, major clinical study, operating room, randomization, randomized controlled trial, sedation, side effect, statistical significance, stimulus, surgery, thigh, visually impaired person","bibtex":"@misc{guerra_g.g._pilot_2017,\n\ttitle = {Pilot randomized controlled trial on early and late remote ischemic preconditioning prior to complex cardiac surgery in young infants},\n\turl = {http://www.blackwell-science.com/pan},\n\tabstract = {Background: Remote ischemic preconditioning involves providing a brief ischemia-reperfusion event to a tissue to create subsequent protection from a more severe ischemia-reperfusion event to a different tissue/organ. The few pediatric remote ischemic preconditioning studies in the literature show conflicting results. Aim: We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial to determine the feasibility of conducting a larger trial and to gather provisional data on the effect of early and late remote ischemic preconditioning on outcomes of infants after surgery for congenital heart disease. Methods: This single-center, double-blind randomized controlled trial of remote ischemic preconditioning vs control (sham-remote ischemic preconditioning) in young infants going for surgery for congenital heart disease at the Stollery Children's Hospital. Remote ischemic preconditioning was performed at 24-48 h preoperatively and immediately prior to cardiopulmonary bypass. Remote ischemic preconditioning stimulus was performed with blood pressure cuffs around the thighs. Primary outcomes were feasibility and peak blood lactate level on day 1 postoperatively. Results: Fifty-two patients were randomized but seven patients became ineligible after randomization leaving 45 patients included in the study. In the included patients, 7 (15\\%) had protocol deviations (five infants did not have the preoperative intervention and two did not receive the intervention in the operating room). From a comfort point of view, only one subject in the control group and two in the Remote ischemic preconditioning group received sedation during the preoperative intervention. There were no study-related adverse events and no complications to the limbs subjected to preconditioning. There were no significant differences between the Remote ischemic preconditioning group and the control group in the highest blood lactate level on day 1 postoperatively (mean difference, 1.28; 95\\%CI, -0.22, 2.78; P-value = 0.093). Conclusion: In infants who underwent surgery for congenital heart disease, our pilot randomized controlled trial on early and late remote ischemic preconditioning proved to be feasible but did not find any significant difference in acute outcomes. A larger trial may be necessary. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley \\& Sons Ltd},\n\tjournal = {Paediatric Anaesthesia},\n\tauthor = {{Guerra G.G.} and {Joffe A.R.} and {Seal R.} and {Phillipos E.} and {Wong M.} and {Moez E.K.} and {Dinu I.A.} and {Duff J.P.} and {Ross D.} and {Rebeyka I.} and {Robertson C.M.T.}},\n\tyear = {2017},\n\tkeywords = {*congenital heart disease, *heart surgery, *intensive care, *ischemic preconditioning, *reperfusion injury, Child, adverse drug reaction, blood pressure cuff, cardiopulmonary bypass, clinical trial, comfort, complication, control group, controlled clinical trial, controlled study, feasibility study, human, human tissue, infant, lactate blood level, major clinical study, operating room, randomization, randomized controlled trial, sedation, side effect, statistical significance, stimulus, surgery, thigh, visually impaired person}\n}\n\n","author_short":["Guerra G.G.","Joffe A.R.","Seal R.","Phillipos E.","Wong M.","Moez E.K.","Dinu I.A.","Duff J.P.","Ross D.","Rebeyka I.","Robertson C.M.T."],"key":"guerra_g.g._pilot_2017","id":"guerra_g.g._pilot_2017","bibbaseid":"guerragg-joffear-sealr-phillipose-wongm-moezek-dinuia-duffjp-etal-pilotrandomizedcontrolledtrialonearlyandlateremoteischemicpreconditioningpriortocomplexcardiacsurgeryinyounginfants-2017","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://www.blackwell-science.com/pan"},"keyword":["*congenital heart disease","*heart surgery","*intensive care","*ischemic preconditioning","*reperfusion injury","Child","adverse drug reaction","blood pressure cuff","cardiopulmonary bypass","clinical trial","comfort","complication","control group","controlled clinical trial","controlled study","feasibility study","human","human tissue","infant","lactate blood level","major clinical study","operating room","randomization","randomized controlled trial","sedation","side effect","statistical significance","stimulus","surgery","thigh","visually impaired person"],"downloads":0,"html":""},"search_terms":["pilot","randomized","controlled","trial","early","late","remote","ischemic","preconditioning","prior","complex","cardiac","surgery","young","infants","guerra g.g.","joffe a.r.","seal r.","phillipos e.","wong m.","moez e.k.","dinu i.a.","duff j.p.","ross d.","rebeyka i.","robertson c.m.t."],"keywords":["*congenital heart disease","*heart surgery","*intensive care","*ischemic preconditioning","*reperfusion injury","child","adverse drug reaction","blood pressure cuff","cardiopulmonary bypass","clinical trial","comfort","complication","control group","controlled clinical trial","controlled study","feasibility study","human","human tissue","infant","lactate blood level","major clinical study","operating room","randomization","randomized controlled trial","sedation","side effect","statistical significance","stimulus","surgery","thigh","visually impaired person"],"authorIDs":[],"dataSources":["9LqPNaySNpNxYBFzj"]}