Mimetic desire and intersubjectivity in disciplinary cultures: constraints or enablers to learning in higher education?. Gunn, V. Studies in Continuing Education, 36(1):67--82, March, 2014.
Mimetic desire and intersubjectivity in disciplinary cultures: constraints or enablers to learning in higher education? [link]Paper  doi  abstract   bibtex   
The interplay of the inner lives (intersubjectivity) of students and academics within a range of disciplinary cultural manifestations is a key element in the generation of student learning. This article suggests that research on student learning has yet to adequately articulate how this interplay occurs, suggesting that a focus on the influence of just one or two disciplinary cultural manifestations gives a partial image of how students become oriented toward or away from learning in higher education. Using a method that synthesizes the literature on organizational cultures, humanities cultural theory, cultural linguistic theory, and philosophical approaches to intersubjectivity, it identifies a framework for understanding the core conditions of learning within the disciplines that is complementary to psychological and phenomenological research on student learning. As an outcome of this exercise, this paper suggests that students' orientations are initiated within the intersubjective relationships that they encounter and that these relationships play out through the contradictions that exist between the full range of disciplinary manifestations. It closes by suggesting that how students interact with the paradoxes of the disciplinary environment is key to enabling them to manage the tension between their immediate subject study needs and broader learning patterns for their post-graduation lives.
@article{ gunn_mimetic_2014,
  title = {Mimetic desire and intersubjectivity in disciplinary cultures: constraints or enablers to learning in higher education?},
  volume = {36},
  issn = {0158037X},
  shorttitle = {Mimetic desire and intersubjectivity in disciplinary cultures},
  url = {http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=94762416&site=ehost-live},
  doi = {10.1080/0158037X.2013.787981},
  abstract = {The interplay of the inner lives (intersubjectivity) of students and academics within a range of disciplinary cultural manifestations is a key element in the generation of student learning. This article suggests that research on student learning has yet to adequately articulate how this interplay occurs, suggesting that a focus on the influence of just one or two disciplinary cultural manifestations gives a partial image of how students become oriented toward or away from learning in higher education. Using a method that synthesizes the literature on organizational cultures, humanities cultural theory, cultural linguistic theory, and philosophical approaches to intersubjectivity, it identifies a framework for understanding the core conditions of learning within the disciplines that is complementary to psychological and phenomenological research on student learning. As an outcome of this exercise, this paper suggests that students' orientations are initiated within the intersubjective relationships that they encounter and that these relationships play out through the contradictions that exist between the full range of disciplinary manifestations. It closes by suggesting that how students interact with the paradoxes of the disciplinary environment is key to enabling them to manage the tension between their immediate subject study needs and broader learning patterns for their post-graduation lives.},
  number = {1},
  urldate = {2015-09-25TZ},
  journal = {Studies in Continuing Education},
  author = {Gunn, Vicky},
  month = {March},
  year = {2014},
  keywords = {CORPORATE culture, HIGHER education, INTERSUBJECTIVITY, SCHOOL discipline, STUDENT engagement, disciplinary cultures, graduate attributes, student learning},
  pages = {67--82}
}

Downloads: 0