GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G. E., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Alonso-Coello, P., & Schünemann, H. J. BMJ, 336(7650):924-926, 2008.
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations [link]Paper  doi  abstract   bibtex   

Guidelines are inconsistent in how they rate the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations. This article explores the advantages of the GRADE system, which is increasingly being adopted by organisations worldwide

@article{RN1592,
   author = {Guyatt, Gordon H. and Oxman, Andrew D. and Vist, Gunn E. and Kunz, Regina and Falck-Ytter, Yngve and Alonso-Coello, Pablo and Schünemann, Holger J.},
   title = {GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations},
   journal = {BMJ},
   volume = {336},
   number = {7650},
   pages = {924-926},
   abstract = {<p>Guidelines are inconsistent in how they rate the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations. This article explores the advantages of the GRADE system, which is increasingly being adopted by organisations worldwide </p>},
   ISSN = {0959-8138, 1756-1833},
   DOI = {10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD},
   url = {https://www.bmj.com/content/336/7650/924
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18436948},
   year = {2008},
   type = {Journal Article}
}

Downloads: 0