Market-based environmental governance and public resources in Alberta, Canada. Hackett, R. Ecosystem Services.
Paper doi abstract bibtex Both proponents and critics of market-based conservation instruments (MBIs) have shared a tendency to characterize these new governance tools as a shift from former state centred management to a greater reliance on markets and market actors as a means of achieving conservation goals. A growing literature on the use of MBIs has outlined a series of characteristics and typologies thought to define these new environmental governance approaches. Chief among these has been the tendency to view such tools as either a displacement of state intervention in favour of private actors and free markets, or active state engagement in re-regulation in support of such ends. This paper draws on a case study of conservation offsets in response to resource development in the Canadian province of Alberta to complicate some of these pervasive narratives. Rather than representing a shift from state to market, or state intervention in support of market instruments, the provincial government has actively engaged in both limiting the development of a market-based system and shaping the parameters of existing industry-NGO offset projects in ways that avoid risks and conflict and support existing power dynamics around resource allocation and use in the province.
@article{hackett_market-based_????,
title = {Market-based environmental governance and public resources in {Alberta}, {Canada}},
issn = {2212-0416},
url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041615000042},
doi = {10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.01.003},
abstract = {Both proponents and critics of market-based conservation instruments (MBIs) have shared a tendency to characterize these new governance tools as a shift from former state centred management to a greater reliance on markets and market actors as a means of achieving conservation goals. A growing literature on the use of MBIs has outlined a series of characteristics and typologies thought to define these new environmental governance approaches. Chief among these has been the tendency to view such tools as either a displacement of state intervention in favour of private actors and free markets, or active state engagement in re-regulation in support of such ends. This paper draws on a case study of conservation offsets in response to resource development in the Canadian province of Alberta to complicate some of these pervasive narratives. Rather than representing a shift from state to market, or state intervention in support of market instruments, the provincial government has actively engaged in both limiting the development of a market-based system and shaping the parameters of existing industry-NGO offset projects in ways that avoid risks and conflict and support existing power dynamics around resource allocation and use in the province.},
urldate = {2015-02-06},
journal = {Ecosystem Services},
author = {Hackett, Ryan},
keywords = {Canada, Conservation, governance, Neoliberalism, Offsets},
file = {ScienceDirect Full Text PDF:files/50823/Hackett - Market-based environmental governance and public r.pdf:application/pdf;ScienceDirect Snapshot:files/50824/Hackett - Market-based environmental governance and public r.html:text/html}
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"a8jXx5ybHMtvq2JTa","bibbaseid":"hackett-marketbasedenvironmentalgovernanceandpublicresourcesinalbertacanada","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2016-09-09T06:27:34.146Z","title":"Market-based environmental governance and public resources in Alberta, Canada","author_short":["Hackett, R."],"year":null,"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://www.sfu.ca/~howlett/howlett16.bib","bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Market-based environmental governance and public resources in Alberta, Canada","issn":"2212-0416","url":"http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041615000042","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.01.003","abstract":"Both proponents and critics of market-based conservation instruments (MBIs) have shared a tendency to characterize these new governance tools as a shift from former state centred management to a greater reliance on markets and market actors as a means of achieving conservation goals. A growing literature on the use of MBIs has outlined a series of characteristics and typologies thought to define these new environmental governance approaches. Chief among these has been the tendency to view such tools as either a displacement of state intervention in favour of private actors and free markets, or active state engagement in re-regulation in support of such ends. This paper draws on a case study of conservation offsets in response to resource development in the Canadian province of Alberta to complicate some of these pervasive narratives. Rather than representing a shift from state to market, or state intervention in support of market instruments, the provincial government has actively engaged in both limiting the development of a market-based system and shaping the parameters of existing industry-NGO offset projects in ways that avoid risks and conflict and support existing power dynamics around resource allocation and use in the province.","urldate":"2015-02-06","journal":"Ecosystem Services","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Hackett"],"firstnames":["Ryan"],"suffixes":[]}],"keywords":"Canada, Conservation, governance, Neoliberalism, Offsets","file":"ScienceDirect Full Text PDF:files/50823/Hackett - Market-based environmental governance and public r.pdf:application/pdf;ScienceDirect Snapshot:files/50824/Hackett - Market-based environmental governance and public r.html:text/html","bibtex":"@article{hackett_market-based_????,\n\ttitle = {Market-based environmental governance and public resources in {Alberta}, {Canada}},\n\tissn = {2212-0416},\n\turl = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041615000042},\n\tdoi = {10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.01.003},\n\tabstract = {Both proponents and critics of market-based conservation instruments (MBIs) have shared a tendency to characterize these new governance tools as a shift from former state centred management to a greater reliance on markets and market actors as a means of achieving conservation goals. A growing literature on the use of MBIs has outlined a series of characteristics and typologies thought to define these new environmental governance approaches. Chief among these has been the tendency to view such tools as either a displacement of state intervention in favour of private actors and free markets, or active state engagement in re-regulation in support of such ends. This paper draws on a case study of conservation offsets in response to resource development in the Canadian province of Alberta to complicate some of these pervasive narratives. Rather than representing a shift from state to market, or state intervention in support of market instruments, the provincial government has actively engaged in both limiting the development of a market-based system and shaping the parameters of existing industry-NGO offset projects in ways that avoid risks and conflict and support existing power dynamics around resource allocation and use in the province.},\n\turldate = {2015-02-06},\n\tjournal = {Ecosystem Services},\n\tauthor = {Hackett, Ryan},\n\tkeywords = {Canada, Conservation, governance, Neoliberalism, Offsets},\n\tfile = {ScienceDirect Full Text PDF:files/50823/Hackett - Market-based environmental governance and public r.pdf:application/pdf;ScienceDirect Snapshot:files/50824/Hackett - Market-based environmental governance and public r.html:text/html}\n}\n\n","author_short":["Hackett, R."],"key":"hackett_market-based_????","id":"hackett_market-based_????","bibbaseid":"hackett-marketbasedenvironmentalgovernanceandpublicresourcesinalbertacanada","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041615000042"},"keyword":["Canada","Conservation","governance","Neoliberalism","Offsets"],"downloads":0},"search_terms":["market","based","environmental","governance","public","resources","alberta","canada","hackett"],"keywords":["canada","conservation","governance","neoliberalism","offsets"],"authorIDs":[],"dataSources":["Bn7xRaKMY43f7hFwh"]}