Notes on Syntaxonomy of Cultural Forest Communities. Hadač, E. & Sofron, J. 15(3):245–258.
Notes on Syntaxonomy of Cultural Forest Communities [link]Paper  doi  abstract   bibtex   
It is suggested that communities of cultivated forests can be incorporated into the system of ” natural” wood communities either as facies, variants or subassociations, if they differ below the association level; if they differ on the association level, a new association is suggested, with the prefix ” culti-” before the planted dominant tree species. Most of our planted forest communities differ on the level of association or less; the communities ofRobinia are the exception. The authors agree withJurko (1963) in classifying them as individual associations, alliances, order and class.
@article{hadacNotesSyntaxonomyCultural1980,
  title = {Notes on Syntaxonomy of Cultural Forest Communities},
  author = {Hadač, Emil and Sofron, Jaroḿır},
  date = {1980},
  journaltitle = {Folia Geobotanica et Phytotaxonomica},
  volume = {15},
  pages = {245--258},
  issn = {0015-5551},
  doi = {10.1007/BF02851808},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02851808},
  abstract = {It is suggested that communities of cultivated forests can be incorporated into the system of ” natural” wood communities either as facies, variants or subassociations, if they differ below the association level; if they differ on the association level, a new association is suggested, with the prefix ” culti-” before the planted dominant tree species. Most of our planted forest communities differ on the level of association or less; the communities ofRobinia are the exception. The authors agree withJurko (1963) in classifying them as individual associations, alliances, order and class.},
  keywords = {*imported-from-citeulike-INRMM,~INRMM-MiD:c-13808088,forest-communities,forest-resources,phytosociology,robinia-pseudoacacia},
  number = {3}
}
Downloads: 0