Notes on Syntaxonomy of Cultural Forest Communities. Hadač, E. & Sofron, J. 15(3):245–258. ![Notes on Syntaxonomy of Cultural Forest Communities [link]](https://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/link.svg "link")
Paper doi abstract bibtex It is suggested that communities of cultivated forests can be incorporated into the system of ” natural” wood communities either as facies, variants or subassociations, if they differ below the association level; if they differ on the association level, a new association is suggested, with the prefix ” culti-” before the planted dominant tree species. Most of our planted forest communities differ on the level of association or less; the communities ofRobinia are the exception. The authors agree withJurko (1963) in classifying them as individual associations, alliances, order and class.
@article{hadacNotesSyntaxonomyCultural1980,
title = {Notes on Syntaxonomy of Cultural Forest Communities},
author = {Hadač, Emil and Sofron, Jaroḿır},
date = {1980},
journaltitle = {Folia Geobotanica et Phytotaxonomica},
volume = {15},
pages = {245--258},
issn = {0015-5551},
doi = {10.1007/BF02851808},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02851808},
abstract = {It is suggested that communities of cultivated forests can be incorporated into the system of ” natural” wood communities either as facies, variants or subassociations, if they differ below the association level; if they differ on the association level, a new association is suggested, with the prefix ” culti-” before the planted dominant tree species. Most of our planted forest communities differ on the level of association or less; the communities ofRobinia are the exception. The authors agree withJurko (1963) in classifying them as individual associations, alliances, order and class.},
keywords = {*imported-from-citeulike-INRMM,~INRMM-MiD:c-13808088,forest-communities,forest-resources,phytosociology,robinia-pseudoacacia},
number = {3}
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"SwawsvwacWe7ExL54","bibbaseid":"hada-sofron-notesonsyntaxonomyofculturalforestcommunities","authorIDs":[],"author_short":["Hadač, E.","Sofron, J."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Notes on Syntaxonomy of Cultural Forest Communities","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Hadač"],"firstnames":["Emil"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Sofron"],"firstnames":["Jaroḿır"],"suffixes":[]}],"date":"1980","journaltitle":"Folia Geobotanica et Phytotaxonomica","volume":"15","pages":"245–258","issn":"0015-5551","doi":"10.1007/BF02851808","url":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02851808","abstract":"It is suggested that communities of cultivated forests can be incorporated into the system of ” natural” wood communities either as facies, variants or subassociations, if they differ below the association level; if they differ on the association level, a new association is suggested, with the prefix ” culti-” before the planted dominant tree species. Most of our planted forest communities differ on the level of association or less; the communities ofRobinia are the exception. The authors agree withJurko (1963) in classifying them as individual associations, alliances, order and class.","keywords":"*imported-from-citeulike-INRMM,~INRMM-MiD:c-13808088,forest-communities,forest-resources,phytosociology,robinia-pseudoacacia","number":"3","bibtex":"@article{hadacNotesSyntaxonomyCultural1980,\n title = {Notes on Syntaxonomy of Cultural Forest Communities},\n author = {Hadač, Emil and Sofron, Jaroḿır},\n date = {1980},\n journaltitle = {Folia Geobotanica et Phytotaxonomica},\n volume = {15},\n pages = {245--258},\n issn = {0015-5551},\n doi = {10.1007/BF02851808},\n url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02851808},\n abstract = {It is suggested that communities of cultivated forests can be incorporated into the system of ” natural” wood communities either as facies, variants or subassociations, if they differ below the association level; if they differ on the association level, a new association is suggested, with the prefix ” culti-” before the planted dominant tree species. Most of our planted forest communities differ on the level of association or less; the communities ofRobinia are the exception. The authors agree withJurko (1963) in classifying them as individual associations, alliances, order and class.},\n keywords = {*imported-from-citeulike-INRMM,~INRMM-MiD:c-13808088,forest-communities,forest-resources,phytosociology,robinia-pseudoacacia},\n number = {3}\n}\n\n","author_short":["Hadač, E.","Sofron, J."],"key":"hadacNotesSyntaxonomyCultural1980","id":"hadacNotesSyntaxonomyCultural1980","bibbaseid":"hada-sofron-notesonsyntaxonomyofculturalforestcommunities","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02851808"},"keyword":["*imported-from-citeulike-INRMM","~INRMM-MiD:c-13808088","forest-communities","forest-resources","phytosociology","robinia-pseudoacacia"],"downloads":0},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://tmpfiles.org/dl/58794/INRMM.bib","creationDate":"2020-07-02T22:41:08.841Z","downloads":0,"keywords":["*imported-from-citeulike-inrmm","~inrmm-mid:c-13808088","forest-communities","forest-resources","phytosociology","robinia-pseudoacacia"],"search_terms":["notes","syntaxonomy","cultural","forest","communities","hadač","sofron"],"title":"Notes on Syntaxonomy of Cultural Forest Communities","year":null,"dataSources":["DXuKbcZTirdigFKPF"]}