@article{hamel_sociology_1997,
	title = {Sociology, {Common} {Sense}, and {Qualitative} {Methodology}: {The} {Position} of {Pierre} {Bourdieu} and {Alain} {Touraine}},
	volume = {22},
	abstract = {Developments of qualitative methodology in French sociology are analyzed with respect to methods proposed by Pierre Bourdieu \& Alain Touraine: "provoked \& accompanied" self-analysis \& the sociological intervention. Discussion compares the position of both authors on problems such as representativeness, objectivity, status of data, epistemological rupture, \& the question of the writing by which sociological knowledge is formed from commonsense knowledge contained in the data. The strengths \& weakeness of each method are examined. 30 References. Adapted from the source document.},
	number = {1},
	journal = {Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers canadiens de sociologie},
	author = {Hamel, J.},
	year = {1997},
	note = {CD: CJSODI; Translated by Nancy Cote; revised by Marie-Rose De Groof Vianna.; OC: Cote, Nancy; De Groof Vianna, Marie-Rose RX: 1 (on Nov 01, 2007)},
	keywords = {Alain Touraine's/Pierre Bourdieu's methods, Alain; Sociological Research; Sociological Theory; France; qualitative methodology development, French sociology, Pierre; Touraine, Qualitative Methods; Methodology (Philosophical); Bourdieu},
	pages = {95--112},
}

{"_id":"jatJNmnYXvFqWY96j","bibbaseid":"hamel-sociologycommonsenseandqualitativemethodologythepositionofpierrebourdieuandalaintouraine-1997","author_short":["Hamel, J."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Sociology, Common Sense, and Qualitative Methodology: The Position of Pierre Bourdieu and Alain Touraine","volume":"22","abstract":"Developments of qualitative methodology in French sociology are analyzed with respect to methods proposed by Pierre Bourdieu & Alain Touraine: \"provoked & accompanied\" self-analysis & the sociological intervention. Discussion compares the position of both authors on problems such as representativeness, objectivity, status of data, epistemological rupture, & the question of the writing by which sociological knowledge is formed from commonsense knowledge contained in the data. The strengths & weakeness of each method are examined. 30 References. Adapted from the source document.","number":"1","journal":"Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers canadiens de sociologie","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Hamel"],"firstnames":["J."],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"1997","note":"CD: CJSODI; Translated by Nancy Cote; revised by Marie-Rose De Groof Vianna.; OC: Cote, Nancy; De Groof Vianna, Marie-Rose RX: 1 (on Nov 01, 2007)","keywords":"Alain Touraine's/Pierre Bourdieu's methods, Alain; Sociological Research; Sociological Theory; France; qualitative methodology development, French sociology, Pierre; Touraine, Qualitative Methods; Methodology (Philosophical); Bourdieu","pages":"95–112","bibtex":"@article{hamel_sociology_1997,\n\ttitle = {Sociology, {Common} {Sense}, and {Qualitative} {Methodology}: {The} {Position} of {Pierre} {Bourdieu} and {Alain} {Touraine}},\n\tvolume = {22},\n\tabstract = {Developments of qualitative methodology in French sociology are analyzed with respect to methods proposed by Pierre Bourdieu \\& Alain Touraine: \"provoked \\& accompanied\" self-analysis \\& the sociological intervention. Discussion compares the position of both authors on problems such as representativeness, objectivity, status of data, epistemological rupture, \\& the question of the writing by which sociological knowledge is formed from commonsense knowledge contained in the data. The strengths \\& weakeness of each method are examined. 30 References. Adapted from the source document.},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\tjournal = {Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers canadiens de sociologie},\n\tauthor = {Hamel, J.},\n\tyear = {1997},\n\tnote = {CD: CJSODI; Translated by Nancy Cote; revised by Marie-Rose De Groof Vianna.; OC: Cote, Nancy; De Groof Vianna, Marie-Rose RX: 1 (on Nov 01, 2007)},\n\tkeywords = {Alain Touraine's/Pierre Bourdieu's methods, Alain; Sociological Research; Sociological Theory; France; qualitative methodology development, French sociology, Pierre; Touraine, Qualitative Methods; Methodology (Philosophical); Bourdieu},\n\tpages = {95--112},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Hamel, J."],"key":"hamel_sociology_1997","id":"hamel_sociology_1997","bibbaseid":"hamel-sociologycommonsenseandqualitativemethodologythepositionofpierrebourdieuandalaintouraine-1997","role":"author","urls":{},"keyword":["Alain Touraine's/Pierre Bourdieu's methods","Alain; Sociological Research; Sociological Theory; France; qualitative methodology development","French sociology","Pierre; Touraine","Qualitative Methods; Methodology (Philosophical); Bourdieu"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero/nigelcox1","dataSources":["BtzEXLT8hmCpSLapT"],"keywords":["alain touraine's/pierre bourdieu's methods","alain; sociological research; sociological theory; france; qualitative methodology development","french sociology","pierre; touraine","qualitative methods; methodology (philosophical); bourdieu"],"search_terms":["sociology","common","sense","qualitative","methodology","position","pierre","bourdieu","alain","touraine","hamel"],"title":"Sociology, Common Sense, and Qualitative Methodology: The Position of Pierre Bourdieu and Alain Touraine","year":1997}