Putting Users in Control of Their Recommendations. Harper, F M., Xu, F., Kaur, H., Condiff, K., Chang, S., & Terveen, L. In RecSys '15, pages 3–10, New York, NY, USA, 2015. ACM. Journal Abbreviation: RecSys '15
Paper doi abstract bibtex The essence of a recommender system is that it can recommend items personalized to the preferences of an individual user. But typically users are given no explicit control over this personalization, and are instead left guessing about how their actions affect the resulting recommendations. We hypothesize that any recommender algorithm will better fit some users' expectations than others, leaving opportunities for improvement. To address this challenge, we study a recommender that puts some control in the hands of users. Specifically, we build and evaluate a system that incorporates user-tuned popularity and recency modifiers, allowing users to express concepts like "show more popular items". We find that users who are given these controls evaluate the resulting recommendations much more positively. Further, we find that users diverge in their preferred settings, confirming the importance of giving control to users.
@inproceedings{harper_putting_2015,
address = {New York, NY, USA},
title = {Putting {Users} in {Control} of {Their} {Recommendations}},
url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2792838.2800179},
doi = {10.1145/2792838.2800179},
abstract = {The essence of a recommender system is that it can recommend items
personalized to the preferences of an individual user. But typically users
are given no explicit control over this personalization, and are instead
left guessing about how their actions affect the resulting
recommendations. We hypothesize that any recommender algorithm will better
fit some users' expectations than others, leaving opportunities for
improvement. To address this challenge, we study a recommender that puts
some control in the hands of users. Specifically, we build and evaluate a
system that incorporates user-tuned popularity and recency modifiers,
allowing users to express concepts like "show more popular items". We find
that users who are given these controls evaluate the resulting
recommendations much more positively. Further, we find that users diverge
in their preferred settings, confirming the importance of giving control
to users.},
urldate = {2015-09-19},
booktitle = {{RecSys} '15},
publisher = {ACM},
author = {Harper, F Maxwell and Xu, Funing and Kaur, Harmanpreet and Condiff, Kyle and Chang, Shuo and Terveen, Loren},
year = {2015},
note = {Journal Abbreviation: RecSys '15},
pages = {3--10},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"YMo8EttZxKnFQRw26","bibbaseid":"harper-xu-kaur-condiff-chang-terveen-puttingusersincontroloftheirrecommendations-2015","authorIDs":[],"author_short":["Harper, F M.","Xu, F.","Kaur, H.","Condiff, K.","Chang, S.","Terveen, L."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"inproceedings","type":"inproceedings","address":"New York, NY, USA","title":"Putting Users in Control of Their Recommendations","url":"http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2792838.2800179","doi":"10.1145/2792838.2800179","abstract":"The essence of a recommender system is that it can recommend items personalized to the preferences of an individual user. But typically users are given no explicit control over this personalization, and are instead left guessing about how their actions affect the resulting recommendations. We hypothesize that any recommender algorithm will better fit some users' expectations than others, leaving opportunities for improvement. To address this challenge, we study a recommender that puts some control in the hands of users. Specifically, we build and evaluate a system that incorporates user-tuned popularity and recency modifiers, allowing users to express concepts like \"show more popular items\". We find that users who are given these controls evaluate the resulting recommendations much more positively. Further, we find that users diverge in their preferred settings, confirming the importance of giving control to users.","urldate":"2015-09-19","booktitle":"RecSys '15","publisher":"ACM","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Harper"],"firstnames":["F","Maxwell"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Xu"],"firstnames":["Funing"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Kaur"],"firstnames":["Harmanpreet"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Condiff"],"firstnames":["Kyle"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Chang"],"firstnames":["Shuo"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Terveen"],"firstnames":["Loren"],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"2015","note":"Journal Abbreviation: RecSys '15","pages":"3–10","bibtex":"@inproceedings{harper_putting_2015,\n\taddress = {New York, NY, USA},\n\ttitle = {Putting {Users} in {Control} of {Their} {Recommendations}},\n\turl = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2792838.2800179},\n\tdoi = {10.1145/2792838.2800179},\n\tabstract = {The essence of a recommender system is that it can recommend items\npersonalized to the preferences of an individual user. But typically users\nare given no explicit control over this personalization, and are instead\nleft guessing about how their actions affect the resulting\nrecommendations. We hypothesize that any recommender algorithm will better\nfit some users' expectations than others, leaving opportunities for\nimprovement. To address this challenge, we study a recommender that puts\nsome control in the hands of users. Specifically, we build and evaluate a\nsystem that incorporates user-tuned popularity and recency modifiers,\nallowing users to express concepts like \"show more popular items\". We find\nthat users who are given these controls evaluate the resulting\nrecommendations much more positively. Further, we find that users diverge\nin their preferred settings, confirming the importance of giving control\nto users.},\n\turldate = {2015-09-19},\n\tbooktitle = {{RecSys} '15},\n\tpublisher = {ACM},\n\tauthor = {Harper, F Maxwell and Xu, Funing and Kaur, Harmanpreet and Condiff, Kyle and Chang, Shuo and Terveen, Loren},\n\tyear = {2015},\n\tnote = {Journal Abbreviation: RecSys '15},\n\tpages = {3--10},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Harper, F M.","Xu, F.","Kaur, H.","Condiff, K.","Chang, S.","Terveen, L."],"key":"harper_putting_2015","id":"harper_putting_2015","bibbaseid":"harper-xu-kaur-condiff-chang-terveen-puttingusersincontroloftheirrecommendations-2015","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2792838.2800179"},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"downloads":0},"bibtype":"inproceedings","biburl":"https://api.zotero.org/users/6655/collections/TJPPJ92X/items?key=VFvZhZXIoHNBbzoLZ1IM2zgf&format=bibtex&limit=100","creationDate":"2020-03-27T02:34:35.370Z","downloads":0,"keywords":[],"search_terms":["putting","users","control","recommendations","harper","xu","kaur","condiff","chang","terveen"],"title":"Putting Users in Control of Their Recommendations","year":2015,"dataSources":["5Dp4QphkvpvNA33zi","jfoasiDDpStqkkoZB","BiuuFc45aHCgJqDLY"]}