Metacognitive monitoring. Hart, J. T., Nelson, T. O., Gerler, D., Narens, L., Arbuckle, T. Y., Cuddy, L. A., Leonesio, R. J., Koriat, A., & Lichtenstein, S. In Metacognition: Core readings., pages 131–231. Allyn & Bacon, Needham Heights, MA, 1992.
Metacognitive monitoring [link]Paper  abstract   bibtex   
[book section covering several chapters] 'Memory and the Feeling-of-Knowing Experience' / J. T. Hart / to evaluate the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing experiences, 2 investigations are reported [which] show the phenomenon to be a relatively accurate indicator of memory storage 'Accuracy of Feeling-of-Knowing Judgments for Predicting Perceptual Identification and Relearning' / Thomas O. Nelson, Daniel Gerler and Louis Narens / offers a dozen potential mechanisms for what might underlie people's feeling-of-knowing judgments (and perhaps other metacognitive judgments, too) 'Discrimination of Item Strength at Time of Presentation' / Tannis Y. Arbuckle and Lola L. Cuddy / [presents] a report of the first empirical investigation of 'judgments of learning,' which are metacognitive judgments that people make soon after they have learned new information and that consist of their predictions about how likely they are to recall that information subsequently 'Do Different Metamemory Judgments Tap the Same Underlying Aspects of Memory?' / R. Jacob Leonesio and Thomas O. Nelson / different aspects of memory are tapped by judgments of learning than by feeling-of-knowing judgments, and therefore the two kinds of metacognitive judgments should be formulated separately in theories of metacognition 'Reasons for Confidence' / Asher Koriat, Sarah Lichtenstein and Baruch Fischhoff / the present studies investigated the possibility that assessment of confidence is biased by attempts to justify one's chosen answer / these attempts include selectively focusing on evidence supporting the chosen answer and disregarding evidence contradicting it 'The Illusion of Knowing: Failure in the Self-Assessment of Comprehension' / Arthur M. Glenberg, Alex Cherry Wilkinson and William Epstein / describes people's attempts at metacognitive monitoring of their comprehension of recently read text (a topic called calibration of comprehension) and an outcome that the authors refer to as an 'illusion of knowing' 'Dynamic Metacognitive Monitoring During Problem Solving' / Janet Metcalfe / five experiments explored the dynamic metacognitions that accompany the problem- and anagram-solving processes 'Reality Monitoring' / Marcia K. Johnson and Carol L. Raye / propose a working model of reality monitoring to account for both discrimination and confusion between memories for thoughts and memories for perceptions (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)
@incollection{hart_metacognitive_1992,
	address = {Needham Heights, MA},
	title = {Metacognitive monitoring},
	isbn = {0-205-13417-3},
	url = {https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,uid&db=psyh&AN=1992-97736-004&site=ehost-live},
	abstract = {[book section covering several chapters]  'Memory and the Feeling-of-Knowing Experience' / J. T. Hart / to evaluate the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing experiences, 2 investigations are reported [which] show the phenomenon to be a relatively accurate indicator of memory storage  'Accuracy of Feeling-of-Knowing Judgments for Predicting Perceptual Identification and Relearning' / Thomas O. Nelson, Daniel Gerler and Louis Narens / offers a dozen potential mechanisms for what might underlie people's feeling-of-knowing judgments (and perhaps other metacognitive judgments, too)  'Discrimination of Item Strength at Time of Presentation' / Tannis Y. Arbuckle and Lola L. Cuddy / [presents] a report of the first empirical investigation of 'judgments of learning,' which are metacognitive judgments that people make soon after they have learned new information and that consist of their predictions about how likely they are to recall that information subsequently  'Do Different Metamemory Judgments Tap the Same Underlying Aspects of Memory?' / R. Jacob Leonesio and Thomas O. Nelson / different aspects of memory are tapped by judgments of learning than by feeling-of-knowing judgments, and therefore the two kinds of metacognitive judgments should be formulated separately in theories of metacognition  'Reasons for Confidence' / Asher Koriat, Sarah Lichtenstein and Baruch Fischhoff / the present studies investigated the possibility that assessment of confidence is biased by attempts to justify one's chosen answer / these attempts include selectively focusing on evidence supporting the chosen answer and disregarding evidence contradicting it  'The Illusion of Knowing: Failure in the Self-Assessment of Comprehension' / Arthur M. Glenberg, Alex Cherry Wilkinson and William Epstein / describes people's attempts at metacognitive monitoring of their comprehension of recently read text (a topic called calibration of comprehension) and an outcome that the authors refer to as an 'illusion of knowing'  'Dynamic Metacognitive Monitoring During Problem Solving' / Janet Metcalfe / five experiments explored the dynamic metacognitions that accompany the problem- and anagram-solving processes  'Reality Monitoring' / Marcia K. Johnson and Carol L. Raye / propose a working model of reality monitoring to account for both discrimination and confusion between memories for thoughts and memories for perceptions (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)},
	booktitle = {Metacognition:  {Core} readings.},
	publisher = {Allyn \& Bacon},
	author = {Hart, J. T. and Nelson, Thomas O. and Gerler, Daniel and Narens, Louis and Arbuckle, Tannis Y. and Cuddy, Lola A. and Leonesio, R. Jacob and Koriat, Asher and Lichtenstein, Sarah},
	editor = {Nelson, Thomas O.},
	year = {1992},
	keywords = {Experimentation, Learning, Memory, Metacognition, Monitoring, Problem Solving, Reality Testing, integrates a wide variety of metacognitive monitoring judgments},
	pages = {131--231},
}

Downloads: 0