EEG-GAN: Generative adversarial networks for electroencephalograhic (EEG) brain signals. Hartmann, K. G., Schirrmeister, R. T., & Ball, T. June, 2018. arXiv:1806.01875 [cs, eess, q-bio, stat] version: 1
EEG-GAN: Generative adversarial networks for electroencephalograhic (EEG) brain signals [link]Paper  abstract   bibtex   
Generative adversarial networks (GANs) are recently highly successful in generative applications involving images and start being applied to time series data. Here we describe EEG-GAN as a framework to generate electroencephalographic (EEG) brain signals. We introduce a modification to the improved training of Wasserstein GANs to stabilize training and investigate a range of architectural choices critical for time series generation (most notably up- and down-sampling). For evaluation we consider and compare different metrics such as Inception score, Frechet inception distance and sliced Wasserstein distance, together showing that our EEG-GAN framework generated naturalistic EEG examples. It thus opens up a range of new generative application scenarios in the neuroscientific and neurological context, such as data augmentation in brain-computer interfacing tasks, EEG super-sampling, or restoration of corrupted data segments. The possibility to generate signals of a certain class and/or with specific properties may also open a new avenue for research into the underlying structure of brain signals.
@misc{hartmann_eeg-gan_2018-2,
	title = {{EEG}-{GAN}: {Generative} adversarial networks for electroencephalograhic ({EEG}) brain signals},
	shorttitle = {{EEG}-{GAN}},
	url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/1806.01875},
	abstract = {Generative adversarial networks (GANs) are recently highly successful in generative applications involving images and start being applied to time series data. Here we describe EEG-GAN as a framework to generate electroencephalographic (EEG) brain signals. We introduce a modification to the improved training of Wasserstein GANs to stabilize training and investigate a range of architectural choices critical for time series generation (most notably up- and down-sampling). For evaluation we consider and compare different metrics such as Inception score, Frechet inception distance and sliced Wasserstein distance, together showing that our EEG-GAN framework generated naturalistic EEG examples. It thus opens up a range of new generative application scenarios in the neuroscientific and neurological context, such as data augmentation in brain-computer interfacing tasks, EEG super-sampling, or restoration of corrupted data segments. The possibility to generate signals of a certain class and/or with specific properties may also open a new avenue for research into the underlying structure of brain signals.},
	urldate = {2023-01-15},
	publisher = {arXiv},
	author = {Hartmann, Kay Gregor and Schirrmeister, Robin Tibor and Ball, Tonio},
	month = jun,
	year = {2018},
	note = {arXiv:1806.01875 [cs, eess, q-bio, stat]
version: 1},
	keywords = {Computer Science - Machine Learning, Electrical Engineering and Systems Science - Signal Processing, Quantitative Biology - Neurons and Cognition, Statistics - Machine Learning},
}

Downloads: 0