{"_id":"P6vt8cf5hG4o2qS4N","bibbaseid":"haspelmath-explaininggrammaticalcodingasymmetriesformfrequencycorrespondencesandpredictability","authorIDs":[],"author_short":["Haspelmath, M."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Explaining Grammatical Coding Asymmetries: Form-Frequency Correspondences and Predictability","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Haspelmath"],"firstnames":["Martin"],"suffixes":[]}],"pages":"26","abstract":"This paper claims that a wide variety of grammatical coding asymmetries can be explained as adaptations to the language users' needs, in terms of frequency of use, predictability and coding efficiency. I claim that all grammatical oppositions involving a minimal meaning difference and a significant frequency difference are reflected in a universal coding asymmetry, i.e. a cross-linguistic pattern in which the less frequent member of the opposition gets special coding, unless the coding is uniformly explicit or uniformly zero. I give 25 examples of pairs of construction types, from a substantial range of grammatical patterns. For some of them, the existing evidence from the world's languages and from corpus counts is already strong, while for others, I know of no counterevidence and I make readily testable claims. I also discuss how the functional-adaptive forces operate in language change, and I discuss a number of possible alternative explanations.","file":"/Users/mmaldona/Zotero/storage/M6LTFSI3/Haspelmath - Explaining grammatical coding asymmetries Form-fr.pdf","language":"en","bibtex":"@article{Haspelmath,\n title = {Explaining Grammatical Coding Asymmetries: {{Form}}-Frequency Correspondences and Predictability},\n author = {Haspelmath, Martin},\n pages = {26},\n abstract = {This paper claims that a wide variety of grammatical coding asymmetries can be explained as adaptations to the language users' needs, in terms of frequency of use, predictability and coding efficiency. I claim that all grammatical oppositions involving a minimal meaning difference and a significant frequency difference are reflected in a universal coding asymmetry, i.e. a cross-linguistic pattern in which the less frequent member of the opposition gets special coding, unless the coding is uniformly explicit or uniformly zero. I give 25 examples of pairs of construction types, from a substantial range of grammatical patterns. For some of them, the existing evidence from the world's languages and from corpus counts is already strong, while for others, I know of no counterevidence and I make readily testable claims. I also discuss how the functional-adaptive forces operate in language change, and I discuss a number of possible alternative explanations.},\n file = {/Users/mmaldona/Zotero/storage/M6LTFSI3/Haspelmath - Explaining grammatical coding asymmetries Form-fr.pdf},\n language = {en}\n}\n\n","author_short":["Haspelmath, M."],"key":"Haspelmath","id":"Haspelmath","bibbaseid":"haspelmath-explaininggrammaticalcodingasymmetriesformfrequencycorrespondencesandpredictability","role":"author","urls":{},"downloads":0,"html":""},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://moramaldonado.github.io/pubs.bib","creationDate":"2020-09-30T16:50:34.146Z","downloads":0,"keywords":[],"search_terms":["explaining","grammatical","coding","asymmetries","form","frequency","correspondences","predictability","haspelmath"],"title":"Explaining Grammatical Coding Asymmetries: Form-Frequency Correspondences and Predictability","year":null,"dataSources":["j6c273hcTc9KW6keJ"]}