Evaluating the Emotion Ontology through use in the self-reporting of emotional responses at an academic conference. Hastings, J., Brass, A., Caine, C., Jay, C., & Stevens, R. Journal of Biomedical Semantics, 5:38, 2014. ![Evaluating the Emotion Ontology through use in the self-reporting of emotional responses at an academic conference [link]](https://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/link.svg "link")
Paper doi abstract bibtex We evaluate the application of the Emotion Ontology (EM) to the task of self-reporting of emotional experience in the context of audience response to academic presentations at the International Conference on Biomedical Ontology (ICBO). Ontology evaluation is regarded as a difficult task. Types of ontology evaluation range from gauging adherence to some philosophical principles, following some engineering method, to assessing fitness for purpose. The Emotion Ontology (EM) represents emotions and all related affective phenomena, and should enable self-reporting or articulation of emotional states and responses; how do we know if this is the case? Here we use the EM ‘in the wild’ in order to evaluate the EM’s ability to capture people’s self-reported emotional responses to a situation through use of the vocabulary provided by the EM.
@article{hastings_evaluating_2014,
title = {Evaluating the {Emotion} {Ontology} through use in the self-reporting of emotional responses at an academic conference},
volume = {5},
issn = {2041-1480},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2041-1480-5-38},
doi = {10.1186/2041-1480-5-38},
abstract = {We evaluate the application of the Emotion Ontology (EM) to the task of self-reporting of emotional experience in the context of audience response to academic presentations at the International Conference on Biomedical Ontology (ICBO). Ontology evaluation is regarded as a difficult task. Types of ontology evaluation range from gauging adherence to some philosophical principles, following some engineering method, to assessing fitness for purpose. The Emotion Ontology (EM) represents emotions and all related affective phenomena, and should enable self-reporting or articulation of emotional states and responses; how do we know if this is the case? Here we use the EM ‘in the wild’ in order to evaluate the EM’s ability to capture people’s self-reported emotional responses to a situation through use of the vocabulary provided by the EM.},
urldate = {2016-05-29TZ},
journal = {Journal of Biomedical Semantics},
author = {Hastings, Janna and Brass, Andy and Caine, Colin and Jay, Caroline and Stevens, Robert},
year = {2014},
pages = {38}
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"nQxY7ozaWngqFJcQH","bibbaseid":"hastings-brass-caine-jay-stevens-evaluatingtheemotionontologythroughuseintheselfreportingofemotionalresponsesatanacademicconference-2014","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2017-04-02T15:52:03.229Z","title":"Evaluating the Emotion Ontology through use in the self-reporting of emotional responses at an academic conference","author_short":["Hastings, J.","Brass, A.","Caine, C.","Jay, C.","Stevens, R."],"year":2014,"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://api.zotero.org/users/1624013/collections/RA5PPQSG/items?key=Rt2IvmiwAWfCbswJBRCEqgQU&format=bibtex&limit=100","bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Evaluating the Emotion Ontology through use in the self-reporting of emotional responses at an academic conference","volume":"5","issn":"2041-1480","url":"http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2041-1480-5-38","doi":"10.1186/2041-1480-5-38","abstract":"We evaluate the application of the Emotion Ontology (EM) to the task of self-reporting of emotional experience in the context of audience response to academic presentations at the International Conference on Biomedical Ontology (ICBO). Ontology evaluation is regarded as a difficult task. Types of ontology evaluation range from gauging adherence to some philosophical principles, following some engineering method, to assessing fitness for purpose. The Emotion Ontology (EM) represents emotions and all related affective phenomena, and should enable self-reporting or articulation of emotional states and responses; how do we know if this is the case? Here we use the EM ‘in the wild’ in order to evaluate the EM’s ability to capture people’s self-reported emotional responses to a situation through use of the vocabulary provided by the EM.","urldate":"2016-05-29TZ","journal":"Journal of Biomedical Semantics","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Hastings"],"firstnames":["Janna"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Brass"],"firstnames":["Andy"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Caine"],"firstnames":["Colin"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Jay"],"firstnames":["Caroline"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Stevens"],"firstnames":["Robert"],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"2014","pages":"38","bibtex":"@article{hastings_evaluating_2014,\n\ttitle = {Evaluating the {Emotion} {Ontology} through use in the self-reporting of emotional responses at an academic conference},\n\tvolume = {5},\n\tissn = {2041-1480},\n\turl = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2041-1480-5-38},\n\tdoi = {10.1186/2041-1480-5-38},\n\tabstract = {We evaluate the application of the Emotion Ontology (EM) to the task of self-reporting of emotional experience in the context of audience response to academic presentations at the International Conference on Biomedical Ontology (ICBO). Ontology evaluation is regarded as a difficult task. Types of ontology evaluation range from gauging adherence to some philosophical principles, following some engineering method, to assessing fitness for purpose. The Emotion Ontology (EM) represents emotions and all related affective phenomena, and should enable self-reporting or articulation of emotional states and responses; how do we know if this is the case? Here we use the EM ‘in the wild’ in order to evaluate the EM’s ability to capture people’s self-reported emotional responses to a situation through use of the vocabulary provided by the EM.},\n\turldate = {2016-05-29TZ},\n\tjournal = {Journal of Biomedical Semantics},\n\tauthor = {Hastings, Janna and Brass, Andy and Caine, Colin and Jay, Caroline and Stevens, Robert},\n\tyear = {2014},\n\tpages = {38}\n}\n\n","author_short":["Hastings, J.","Brass, A.","Caine, C.","Jay, C.","Stevens, R."],"key":"hastings_evaluating_2014","id":"hastings_evaluating_2014","bibbaseid":"hastings-brass-caine-jay-stevens-evaluatingtheemotionontologythroughuseintheselfreportingofemotionalresponsesatanacademicconference-2014","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2041-1480-5-38"},"downloads":0},"search_terms":["evaluating","emotion","ontology","through","use","self","reporting","emotional","responses","academic","conference","hastings","brass","caine","jay","stevens"],"keywords":[],"authorIDs":[],"dataSources":["zpZ22pGESyEDZS7Hb"]}