@article{healy_interface_2003,
	title = {Interface between authorship, industry and science in the domain of therapeutics},
	volume = {183},
	issn = {0007-1250, 1472-1465},
	url = {https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/the-british-journal-of-psychiatry/article/interface-between-authorship-industry-and-science-in-the-domain-of-therapeutics/C6C9C63588A474F6CF6CA27BA2BD43A6},
	doi = {10.1192/bjp.183.1.22},
	abstract = {Background
Changes in the character of medical authorship.


Aims
To compare the impact of industry-linked and non-industry linked articles.


Method
We compared articles on sertraline being coordinated by a medical writing agency with articles not coordinated in this way. We calculated numbers of Medline-listed articles per author, journal impactfactors, literature profiles and citation rates of both sets of articles.


Results
Non-agency-linked articles on sertraline had an average of 2.95 authors per article, a mean length of 3.4 pages, a mean Medline listing of 37 articles per author (95\% CI 27–47) and a mean literature profile of 283 per article (95\% CI 130–435). Agency-linked articles on sertraline had an average of 6.6 authors per article, a mean length of 10.7 pages, a mean Medline listing of 70 articles per author (95\% CI 62–79) and a mean literature profile of 1839 per article (95\% CI 1076-2602). The citation rate for agency articles was 20.2 (95\% CI 13.4–27.0) and for non-agency articles it was 3.7 (95\% CI 3.3–8.1).


Conclusions
The literature profiles and citation rates of industry-linked and non-industry-linked articles differ. The emerging style of authorship in industry-linked articles can deliver good-quality articles, but it raises concerns for the scientific base of therapeutics.},
	language = {en},
	number = {1},
	urldate = {2019-10-07},
	journal = {The British Journal of Psychiatry},
	author = {Healy, David and Cattell, Dinah},
	month = jul,
	year = {2003},
	keywords = {8 Ignorance and funding bias, PRINTED (Fonds papier)},
	pages = {22--27},
}

{"_id":"HrZGQiysi6ppZoLQd","bibbaseid":"healy-cattell-interfacebetweenauthorshipindustryandscienceinthedomainoftherapeutics-2003","authorIDs":[],"author_short":["Healy, D.","Cattell, D."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Interface between authorship, industry and science in the domain of therapeutics","volume":"183","issn":"0007-1250, 1472-1465","url":"https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/the-british-journal-of-psychiatry/article/interface-between-authorship-industry-and-science-in-the-domain-of-therapeutics/C6C9C63588A474F6CF6CA27BA2BD43A6","doi":"10.1192/bjp.183.1.22","abstract":"Background Changes in the character of medical authorship. Aims To compare the impact of industry-linked and non-industry linked articles. Method We compared articles on sertraline being coordinated by a medical writing agency with articles not coordinated in this way. We calculated numbers of Medline-listed articles per author, journal impactfactors, literature profiles and citation rates of both sets of articles. Results Non-agency-linked articles on sertraline had an average of 2.95 authors per article, a mean length of 3.4 pages, a mean Medline listing of 37 articles per author (95% CI 27–47) and a mean literature profile of 283 per article (95% CI 130–435). Agency-linked articles on sertraline had an average of 6.6 authors per article, a mean length of 10.7 pages, a mean Medline listing of 70 articles per author (95% CI 62–79) and a mean literature profile of 1839 per article (95% CI 1076-2602). The citation rate for agency articles was 20.2 (95% CI 13.4–27.0) and for non-agency articles it was 3.7 (95% CI 3.3–8.1). Conclusions The literature profiles and citation rates of industry-linked and non-industry-linked articles differ. The emerging style of authorship in industry-linked articles can deliver good-quality articles, but it raises concerns for the scientific base of therapeutics.","language":"en","number":"1","urldate":"2019-10-07","journal":"The British Journal of Psychiatry","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Healy"],"firstnames":["David"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Cattell"],"firstnames":["Dinah"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"July","year":"2003","keywords":"8 Ignorance and funding bias, PRINTED (Fonds papier)","pages":"22–27","bibtex":"@article{healy_interface_2003,\n\ttitle = {Interface between authorship, industry and science in the domain of therapeutics},\n\tvolume = {183},\n\tissn = {0007-1250, 1472-1465},\n\turl = {https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/the-british-journal-of-psychiatry/article/interface-between-authorship-industry-and-science-in-the-domain-of-therapeutics/C6C9C63588A474F6CF6CA27BA2BD43A6},\n\tdoi = {10.1192/bjp.183.1.22},\n\tabstract = {Background\nChanges in the character of medical authorship.\n\n\nAims\nTo compare the impact of industry-linked and non-industry linked articles.\n\n\nMethod\nWe compared articles on sertraline being coordinated by a medical writing agency with articles not coordinated in this way. We calculated numbers of Medline-listed articles per author, journal impactfactors, literature profiles and citation rates of both sets of articles.\n\n\nResults\nNon-agency-linked articles on sertraline had an average of 2.95 authors per article, a mean length of 3.4 pages, a mean Medline listing of 37 articles per author (95\\% CI 27–47) and a mean literature profile of 283 per article (95\\% CI 130–435). Agency-linked articles on sertraline had an average of 6.6 authors per article, a mean length of 10.7 pages, a mean Medline listing of 70 articles per author (95\\% CI 62–79) and a mean literature profile of 1839 per article (95\\% CI 1076-2602). The citation rate for agency articles was 20.2 (95\\% CI 13.4–27.0) and for non-agency articles it was 3.7 (95\\% CI 3.3–8.1).\n\n\nConclusions\nThe literature profiles and citation rates of industry-linked and non-industry-linked articles differ. The emerging style of authorship in industry-linked articles can deliver good-quality articles, but it raises concerns for the scientific base of therapeutics.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2019-10-07},\n\tjournal = {The British Journal of Psychiatry},\n\tauthor = {Healy, David and Cattell, Dinah},\n\tmonth = jul,\n\tyear = {2003},\n\tkeywords = {8 Ignorance and funding bias, PRINTED (Fonds papier)},\n\tpages = {22--27},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Healy, D.","Cattell, D."],"key":"healy_interface_2003","id":"healy_interface_2003","bibbaseid":"healy-cattell-interfacebetweenauthorshipindustryandscienceinthedomainoftherapeutics-2003","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/the-british-journal-of-psychiatry/article/interface-between-authorship-industry-and-science-in-the-domain-of-therapeutics/C6C9C63588A474F6CF6CA27BA2BD43A6"},"keyword":["8 Ignorance and funding bias","PRINTED (Fonds papier)"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"downloads":0},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"http://bibbase.org/zotero-group/science_et_ignorance/1340424","creationDate":"2020-03-19T19:43:45.368Z","downloads":0,"keywords":["8 ignorance and funding bias","printed (fonds papier)"],"search_terms":["interface","between","authorship","industry","science","domain","therapeutics","healy","cattell"],"title":"Interface between authorship, industry and science in the domain of therapeutics","year":2003,"dataSources":["zX4acseCDM6D58AW7","NTvuMntpta5z9CAbT"]}