Shakedown and ratchetting under tension–torsion loadings: analysis and experiments. Heitzer, M., Staat, M., Reiners, H., & Schubert, F. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 225(1):11-26, 10, 2003. ![Shakedown and ratchetting under tension–torsion loadings: analysis and experiments [link]](https://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/link.svg "link")
Website doi abstract bibtex Structural design analyses are conducted with the aim of verifying the exclusion of ratchetting. To this end it is important to make a clear distinction between the shakedown range and the ratchetting range. The performed experiment comprised a hollow tension specimen which was subjected to alternating axial forces, superimposed with constant moments. First, a series of uniaxial tests has been carried out in order to calibrate a bounded kinematic hardening rule. The load parameters have been selected on the basis of previous shakedown analyses with the PERMAS code using a kinematic hardening material model. It is shown that this shakedown analysis gives reasonable agreement between the experimental and the numerical results. A linear and a nonlinear kinematic hardening model of two-surface plasticity are compared in material shakedown analysis.
@article{
title = {Shakedown and ratchetting under tension–torsion loadings: analysis and experiments},
type = {article},
year = {2003},
pages = {11-26},
volume = {225},
websites = {http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0029549303001341},
month = {10},
id = {0f7865d0-e265-3799-b726-7a5b693cdde2},
created = {2014-06-02T18:47:19.000Z},
accessed = {2014-07-28},
file_attached = {false},
profile_id = {93ec0d5b-403c-3f87-b702-40b6362f05e6},
last_modified = {2020-03-12T22:30:00.303Z},
read = {false},
starred = {false},
authored = {true},
confirmed = {true},
hidden = {false},
citation_key = {Heitzer2003},
private_publication = {false},
abstract = {Structural design analyses are conducted with the aim of verifying the exclusion of ratchetting. To this end it is important to make a clear distinction between the shakedown range and the ratchetting range. The performed experiment comprised a hollow tension specimen which was subjected to alternating axial forces, superimposed with constant moments. First, a series of uniaxial tests has been carried out in order to calibrate a bounded kinematic hardening rule. The load parameters have been selected on the basis of previous shakedown analyses with the PERMAS code using a kinematic hardening material model. It is shown that this shakedown analysis gives reasonable agreement between the experimental and the numerical results. A linear and a nonlinear kinematic hardening model of two-surface plasticity are compared in material shakedown analysis.},
bibtype = {article},
author = {Heitzer, Michael and Staat, Manfred and Reiners, H. and Schubert, Florian},
doi = {10.1016/S0029-5493(03)00134-1},
journal = {Nuclear Engineering and Design},
number = {1}
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"8YuLCyFh5q3EuPCf6","bibbaseid":"heitzer-staat-reiners-schubert-shakedownandratchettingundertensiontorsionloadingsanalysisandexperiments-2003","authorIDs":["5dba9b3cdd3901df010000ff","5dbc2e733d8602de01000053","jhiQiuMkuDQBRuuJ8"],"author_short":["Heitzer, M.","Staat, M.","Reiners, H.","Schubert, F."],"bibdata":{"title":"Shakedown and ratchetting under tension–torsion loadings: analysis and experiments","type":"article","year":"2003","pages":"11-26","volume":"225","websites":"http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0029549303001341","month":"10","id":"0f7865d0-e265-3799-b726-7a5b693cdde2","created":"2014-06-02T18:47:19.000Z","accessed":"2014-07-28","file_attached":false,"profile_id":"93ec0d5b-403c-3f87-b702-40b6362f05e6","last_modified":"2020-03-12T22:30:00.303Z","read":false,"starred":false,"authored":"true","confirmed":"true","hidden":false,"citation_key":"Heitzer2003","private_publication":false,"abstract":"Structural design analyses are conducted with the aim of verifying the exclusion of ratchetting. To this end it is important to make a clear distinction between the shakedown range and the ratchetting range. The performed experiment comprised a hollow tension specimen which was subjected to alternating axial forces, superimposed with constant moments. First, a series of uniaxial tests has been carried out in order to calibrate a bounded kinematic hardening rule. The load parameters have been selected on the basis of previous shakedown analyses with the PERMAS code using a kinematic hardening material model. It is shown that this shakedown analysis gives reasonable agreement between the experimental and the numerical results. A linear and a nonlinear kinematic hardening model of two-surface plasticity are compared in material shakedown analysis.","bibtype":"article","author":"Heitzer, Michael and Staat, Manfred and Reiners, H. and Schubert, Florian","doi":"10.1016/S0029-5493(03)00134-1","journal":"Nuclear Engineering and Design","number":"1","bibtex":"@article{\n title = {Shakedown and ratchetting under tension–torsion loadings: analysis and experiments},\n type = {article},\n year = {2003},\n pages = {11-26},\n volume = {225},\n websites = {http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0029549303001341},\n month = {10},\n id = {0f7865d0-e265-3799-b726-7a5b693cdde2},\n created = {2014-06-02T18:47:19.000Z},\n accessed = {2014-07-28},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {93ec0d5b-403c-3f87-b702-40b6362f05e6},\n last_modified = {2020-03-12T22:30:00.303Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {true},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n citation_key = {Heitzer2003},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {Structural design analyses are conducted with the aim of verifying the exclusion of ratchetting. To this end it is important to make a clear distinction between the shakedown range and the ratchetting range. The performed experiment comprised a hollow tension specimen which was subjected to alternating axial forces, superimposed with constant moments. First, a series of uniaxial tests has been carried out in order to calibrate a bounded kinematic hardening rule. The load parameters have been selected on the basis of previous shakedown analyses with the PERMAS code using a kinematic hardening material model. It is shown that this shakedown analysis gives reasonable agreement between the experimental and the numerical results. A linear and a nonlinear kinematic hardening model of two-surface plasticity are compared in material shakedown analysis.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Heitzer, Michael and Staat, Manfred and Reiners, H. and Schubert, Florian},\n doi = {10.1016/S0029-5493(03)00134-1},\n journal = {Nuclear Engineering and Design},\n number = {1}\n}","author_short":["Heitzer, M.","Staat, M.","Reiners, H.","Schubert, F."],"urls":{"Website":"http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0029549303001341"},"biburl":"https://bibbase.org/service/mendeley/93ec0d5b-403c-3f87-b702-40b6362f05e6","bibbaseid":"heitzer-staat-reiners-schubert-shakedownandratchettingundertensiontorsionloadingsanalysisandexperiments-2003","role":"author","metadata":{"authorlinks":{"staat, m":"https://bibbase.org/service/mendeley/93ec0d5b-403c-3f87-b702-40b6362f05e6"}},"downloads":0},"bibtype":"article","creationDate":"2019-10-31T08:28:44.241Z","downloads":0,"keywords":[],"search_terms":["shakedown","ratchetting","under","tension","torsion","loadings","analysis","experiments","heitzer","staat","reiners","schubert"],"title":"Shakedown and ratchetting under tension–torsion loadings: analysis and experiments","year":2003,"biburl":"https://bibbase.org/service/mendeley/93ec0d5b-403c-3f87-b702-40b6362f05e6","dataSources":["i5FJs3p7i69258A5p","ya2CyA73rpZseyrZ8","J85Tv7d2C3MXhGnoK","2252seNhipfTmjEBQ"]}