Comparison Between Artificial Neural Networks and Classical Statsitical Methods in Pattern Recognition. Hervás-Martínez, C., Romero Soto, E. J., García-Pedrajas, N., & Medina Carnicer, R. In Proceedings of Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty (IPMU), pages 351-360, 1992.
Comparison Between Artificial Neural Networks and Classical Statsitical Methods in Pattern Recognition [link]Paper  bibtex   
@inproceedings{ dblp3586746,
  title = {Comparison Between Artificial Neural Networks and Classical Statsitical Methods in Pattern Recognition},
  author = {César Hervás-Martínez and E. J. Romero Soto and Nicolás García-Pedrajas and Rafael Medina Carnicer},
  author_short = {Hervás-Martínez, C. and Romero Soto, E. J. and García-Pedrajas, N. and Medina Carnicer, R.},
  bibtype = {inproceedings},
  type = {inproceedings},
  year = {1992},
  key = {dblp3586746},
  id = {dblp3586746},
  biburl = {http://www.dblp.org/rec/bibtex/conf/ipmu/MartinezSGC92},
  url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-56735-6_73},
  conference = {IPMU},
  pages = {351-360},
  text = {IPMU 1992:351-360},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty (IPMU)}
}

Downloads: 0