Text to ideology or text to party status?. Hirst, G., Riabinin, Y., Graham, J., Boizot-Roche, M., & Morris, C. Kaal, B., Maks, I., & van Elfrinkhof, A., editors. From Text to Political Positions: Text analysis across disciplines, pages 61–79. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 2014. Send e-mail to the first author to request a copy
From Text to Political Positions: Text analysis across disciplines [link]Paper  doi  abstract   bibtex   
Several recent papers have used support-vector machines with word features to classify political texts — in particular, legislative speech — by ideology. Our own work on this topic led us to hypothesize that such classifiers are sensitive not to expressions of ideology but rather to expressions of attack and defence, opposition and government. We tested this hypothesis by training on one parliament and testing on another in which party roles have been interchanged, and we find that the performance of the classifier completely disintegrates. But removing the factor of government-opposition status, as in the European Parliament, enables a more-ideological classification. Our results suggest that the language of attack and defence, of government and opposition, may dominate and confound any sensitivity to ideology in these kinds of classifiers.
@InBook{	  hirstt2pp,
  author	= {Graeme Hirst and Yaroslav Riabinin and Jory Graham and
		  Magali Boizot-Roche and Colin Morris},
  chapter	= {Text to ideology or text to party status?},
  editor	= { Bertie Kaal and Isa Maks and Annemarie van Elfrinkhof},
  title		= {From Text to Political Positions: Text analysis across
		  disciplines},
  address	= {Amsterdam},
  publisher	= {John Benjamins Publishing Company},
  year		= {2014},
  pages		= {61--79},
  doi		= {doi:10.1075/dapsac.55.05hir},
  url		= {https://benjamins.com/#catalog/books/dapsac.55.05hir/details}
		  ,
  abstract	= {Several recent papers have used support-vector machines
		  with word features to classify political texts — in
		  particular, legislative speech — by ideology. Our own
		  work on this topic led us to hypothesize that such
		  classifiers are sensitive not to expressions of ideology
		  but rather to expressions of attack and defence, opposition
		  and government. We tested this hypothesis by training on
		  one parliament and testing on another in which party roles
		  have been interchanged, and we find that the performance of
		  the classifier completely disintegrates. But removing the
		  factor of government-opposition status, as in the European
		  Parliament, enables a more-ideological classification. Our
		  results suggest that the language of attack and defence, of
		  government and opposition, may dominate and confound any
		  sensitivity to ideology in these kinds of classifiers.},
  note		= {Send e-mail to the first author to request a copy}
}

Downloads: 0