Modelling combined harvest and effort regulations: the case of the Dutch beam trawl fishery for plaice and sole in the North Sea. Hoff, A. & Frost, H. ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE, 65(6):822-831, OXFORD UNIV PRESS, GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND, SEP, 2008. doi abstract bibtex Currently, several European fishing fleets are regulated through a combination of harvest and effort control. The two regulation schemes are interrelated, i.e. a given quota limit will necessarily determine the effort used, and vice versa. It is important to acknowledge this causality when assessing combined effort and harvest regulation systems. A bioeconomic feedback model is presented that takes into account the causality between effort and harvest control by switching back and forth between the two, depending on which is the binding rule. The model consists of a biological and an economic operation module, the former simulating stock assessment and quota establishment, and the latter simulating the economic fleet dynamics. When harvest control is binding, catch is evaluated using the biological projection formula, whereas the economics-based Cobb-Douglas production function is used when effort is binding. The method is applied to the Dutch beam trawl fishery for plaice and sole in the North Sea.
@article{ ISI:000257181600002,
Author = {Hoff, A. and Frost, H.},
Title = {{Modelling combined harvest and effort regulations: the case of the Dutch
beam trawl fishery for plaice and sole in the North Sea}},
Journal = {{ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE}},
Year = {{2008}},
Volume = {{65}},
Number = {{6}},
Pages = {{822-831}},
Month = {{SEP}},
Abstract = {{Currently, several European fishing fleets are regulated through a
combination of harvest and effort control. The two regulation schemes
are interrelated, i.e. a given quota limit will necessarily determine
the effort used, and vice versa. It is important to acknowledge this
causality when assessing combined effort and harvest regulation systems.
A bioeconomic feedback model is presented that takes into account the
causality between effort and harvest control by switching back and forth
between the two, depending on which is the binding rule. The model
consists of a biological and an economic operation module, the former
simulating stock assessment and quota establishment, and the latter
simulating the economic fleet dynamics. When harvest control is binding,
catch is evaluated using the biological projection formula, whereas the
economics-based Cobb-Douglas production function is used when effort is
binding. The method is applied to the Dutch beam trawl fishery for
plaice and sole in the North Sea.}},
Publisher = {{OXFORD UNIV PRESS}},
Address = {{GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND}},
Type = {{Article}},
Language = {{English}},
Affiliation = {{Hoff, A (Reprint Author), Univ Copenhagen, Inst Food \& Resource Econ, Rolighedsvej 25, DK-1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Hoff, A.; Frost, H., Univ Copenhagen, Inst Food \& Resource Econ, DK-1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.}},
DOI = {{10.1093/icesjms/fsn057}},
ISSN = {{1054-3139}},
Keywords = {{bioeconomic feedback model; effort control; fleet dynamics; FLR; harvest
control}},
Keywords-Plus = {{FISHING EFFORT}},
Research-Areas = {{Fisheries; Marine \& Freshwater Biology; Oceanography}},
Web-of-Science-Categories = {{Fisheries; Marine \& Freshwater Biology; Oceanography}},
Author-Email = {{ah@foi.dk}},
Number-of-Cited-References = {{24}},
Times-Cited = {{11}},
Usage-Count-Last-180-days = {{0}},
Usage-Count-Since-2013 = {{6}},
Journal-ISO = {{ICES J. Mar. Sci.}},
Doc-Delivery-Number = {{319RN}},
Unique-ID = {{ISI:000257181600002}},
OA = {{No}},
DA = {{2017-08-17}},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"fjaozGaLohvT3j4hn","bibbaseid":"hoff-frost-modellingcombinedharvestandeffortregulationsthecaseofthedutchbeamtrawlfisheryforplaiceandsoleinthenorthsea-2008","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2017-08-17T14:08:07.672Z","title":"Modelling combined harvest and effort regulations: the case of the Dutch beam trawl fishery for plaice and sole in the North Sea","author_short":["Hoff, A.","Frost, H."],"year":2008,"bibtype":"article","biburl":"http://flr-project.org/flr.bib","bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"Article","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Hoff"],"firstnames":["A."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Frost"],"firstnames":["H."],"suffixes":[]}],"title":"Modelling combined harvest and effort regulations: the case of the Dutch beam trawl fishery for plaice and sole in the North Sea","journal":"ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE","year":"2008","volume":"65","number":"6","pages":"822-831","month":"SEP","abstract":"Currently, several European fishing fleets are regulated through a combination of harvest and effort control. The two regulation schemes are interrelated, i.e. a given quota limit will necessarily determine the effort used, and vice versa. It is important to acknowledge this causality when assessing combined effort and harvest regulation systems. A bioeconomic feedback model is presented that takes into account the causality between effort and harvest control by switching back and forth between the two, depending on which is the binding rule. The model consists of a biological and an economic operation module, the former simulating stock assessment and quota establishment, and the latter simulating the economic fleet dynamics. When harvest control is binding, catch is evaluated using the biological projection formula, whereas the economics-based Cobb-Douglas production function is used when effort is binding. The method is applied to the Dutch beam trawl fishery for plaice and sole in the North Sea.","publisher":"OXFORD UNIV PRESS","address":"GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","language":"English","affiliation":"Hoff, A (Reprint Author), Univ Copenhagen, Inst Food & Resource Econ, Rolighedsvej 25, DK-1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark. Hoff, A.; Frost, H., Univ Copenhagen, Inst Food & Resource Econ, DK-1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.","doi":"10.1093/icesjms/fsn057","issn":"1054-3139","keywords":"bioeconomic feedback model; effort control; fleet dynamics; FLR; harvest control","keywords-plus":"FISHING EFFORT","research-areas":"Fisheries; Marine & Freshwater Biology; Oceanography","web-of-science-categories":"Fisheries; Marine & Freshwater Biology; Oceanography","author-email":"ah@foi.dk","number-of-cited-references":"24","times-cited":"11","usage-count-last-180-days":"0","usage-count-since-2013":"6","journal-iso":"ICES J. Mar. Sci.","doc-delivery-number":"319RN","unique-id":"ISI:000257181600002","oa":"No","da":"2017-08-17","bibtex":"@article{ ISI:000257181600002,\nAuthor = {Hoff, A. and Frost, H.},\nTitle = {{Modelling combined harvest and effort regulations: the case of the Dutch\n beam trawl fishery for plaice and sole in the North Sea}},\nJournal = {{ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE}},\nYear = {{2008}},\nVolume = {{65}},\nNumber = {{6}},\nPages = {{822-831}},\nMonth = {{SEP}},\nAbstract = {{Currently, several European fishing fleets are regulated through a\n combination of harvest and effort control. The two regulation schemes\n are interrelated, i.e. a given quota limit will necessarily determine\n the effort used, and vice versa. It is important to acknowledge this\n causality when assessing combined effort and harvest regulation systems.\n A bioeconomic feedback model is presented that takes into account the\n causality between effort and harvest control by switching back and forth\n between the two, depending on which is the binding rule. The model\n consists of a biological and an economic operation module, the former\n simulating stock assessment and quota establishment, and the latter\n simulating the economic fleet dynamics. When harvest control is binding,\n catch is evaluated using the biological projection formula, whereas the\n economics-based Cobb-Douglas production function is used when effort is\n binding. The method is applied to the Dutch beam trawl fishery for\n plaice and sole in the North Sea.}},\nPublisher = {{OXFORD UNIV PRESS}},\nAddress = {{GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND}},\nType = {{Article}},\nLanguage = {{English}},\nAffiliation = {{Hoff, A (Reprint Author), Univ Copenhagen, Inst Food \\& Resource Econ, Rolighedsvej 25, DK-1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.\n Hoff, A.; Frost, H., Univ Copenhagen, Inst Food \\& Resource Econ, DK-1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.}},\nDOI = {{10.1093/icesjms/fsn057}},\nISSN = {{1054-3139}},\nKeywords = {{bioeconomic feedback model; effort control; fleet dynamics; FLR; harvest\n control}},\nKeywords-Plus = {{FISHING EFFORT}},\nResearch-Areas = {{Fisheries; Marine \\& Freshwater Biology; Oceanography}},\nWeb-of-Science-Categories = {{Fisheries; Marine \\& Freshwater Biology; Oceanography}},\nAuthor-Email = {{ah@foi.dk}},\nNumber-of-Cited-References = {{24}},\nTimes-Cited = {{11}},\nUsage-Count-Last-180-days = {{0}},\nUsage-Count-Since-2013 = {{6}},\nJournal-ISO = {{ICES J. Mar. Sci.}},\nDoc-Delivery-Number = {{319RN}},\nUnique-ID = {{ISI:000257181600002}},\nOA = {{No}},\nDA = {{2017-08-17}},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Hoff, A.","Frost, H."],"key":"ISI:000257181600002","id":"ISI:000257181600002","bibbaseid":"hoff-frost-modellingcombinedharvestandeffortregulationsthecaseofthedutchbeamtrawlfisheryforplaiceandsoleinthenorthsea-2008","role":"author","urls":{},"keyword":["bioeconomic feedback model; effort control; fleet dynamics; FLR; harvest control"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"downloads":0},"search_terms":["modelling","combined","harvest","effort","regulations","case","dutch","beam","trawl","fishery","plaice","sole","north","sea","hoff","frost"],"keywords":["bioeconomic feedback model; effort control; fleet dynamics; flr; harvest control"],"authorIDs":[],"dataSources":["WA8XYs6LQoFRqHaQt","NDGPxX9hJs9BdrF52"]}