@article{holmDefenseBlackBox2019,
  title = {In Defense of the Black Box},
  author = {Holm, Elizabeth A.},
  date = {2019},
  journaltitle = {Science},
  volume = {364},
  pages = {26--27},
  issn = {1095-9203},
  doi = {10.1126/science.aax0162},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax0162},
  urldate = {2019-04-08},
  abstract = {he science fiction writer Douglas Adams imagined the greatest computer ever built, Deep Thought, programmed to answer the deepest question ever asked: the Great Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything. After 7.5 million years of processing, Deep Thought revealed its answer: Forty-two (1). As artificial intelligence (AI) systems enter every sector of human endeavor - including science, engineering, and health - humanity is confronted by the same conundrum that Adams encapsulated so succinctly: What good is knowing the answer when it is unclear why it is the answer? What good is a black box?},
  keywords = {~INRMM-MiD:z-EVMAGQ64,artificial-intelligence,bias-disembodied-science-vs-computational-scholarship,computational-science,computational-science-automation,computational-science-literacy,epistemology,ethics,science-ethics,transparency},
  number = {6435}
}

{"_id":"sPjE8kadXeFhRjgyb","bibbaseid":"holm-indefenseoftheblackbox","authorIDs":[],"author_short":["Holm, E. A."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"In Defense of the Black Box","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Holm"],"firstnames":["Elizabeth","A."],"suffixes":[]}],"date":"2019","journaltitle":"Science","volume":"364","pages":"26–27","issn":"1095-9203","doi":"10.1126/science.aax0162","url":"https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax0162","urldate":"2019-04-08","abstract":"he science fiction writer Douglas Adams imagined the greatest computer ever built, Deep Thought, programmed to answer the deepest question ever asked: the Great Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything. After 7.5 million years of processing, Deep Thought revealed its answer: Forty-two (1). As artificial intelligence (AI) systems enter every sector of human endeavor - including science, engineering, and health - humanity is confronted by the same conundrum that Adams encapsulated so succinctly: What good is knowing the answer when it is unclear why it is the answer? What good is a black box?","keywords":"~INRMM-MiD:z-EVMAGQ64,artificial-intelligence,bias-disembodied-science-vs-computational-scholarship,computational-science,computational-science-automation,computational-science-literacy,epistemology,ethics,science-ethics,transparency","number":"6435","bibtex":"@article{holmDefenseBlackBox2019,\n title = {In Defense of the Black Box},\n author = {Holm, Elizabeth A.},\n date = {2019},\n journaltitle = {Science},\n volume = {364},\n pages = {26--27},\n issn = {1095-9203},\n doi = {10.1126/science.aax0162},\n url = {https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax0162},\n urldate = {2019-04-08},\n abstract = {he science fiction writer Douglas Adams imagined the greatest computer ever built, Deep Thought, programmed to answer the deepest question ever asked: the Great Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything. After 7.5 million years of processing, Deep Thought revealed its answer: Forty-two (1). As artificial intelligence (AI) systems enter every sector of human endeavor - including science, engineering, and health - humanity is confronted by the same conundrum that Adams encapsulated so succinctly: What good is knowing the answer when it is unclear why it is the answer? What good is a black box?},\n keywords = {~INRMM-MiD:z-EVMAGQ64,artificial-intelligence,bias-disembodied-science-vs-computational-scholarship,computational-science,computational-science-automation,computational-science-literacy,epistemology,ethics,science-ethics,transparency},\n number = {6435}\n}\n\n","author_short":["Holm, E. A."],"key":"holmDefenseBlackBox2019","id":"holmDefenseBlackBox2019","bibbaseid":"holm-indefenseoftheblackbox","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax0162"},"keyword":["~INRMM-MiD:z-EVMAGQ64","artificial-intelligence","bias-disembodied-science-vs-computational-scholarship","computational-science","computational-science-automation","computational-science-literacy","epistemology","ethics","science-ethics","transparency"],"downloads":0},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://tmpfiles.org/dl/58794/INRMM.bib","creationDate":"2020-07-02T22:41:09.645Z","downloads":0,"keywords":["~inrmm-mid:z-evmagq64","artificial-intelligence","bias-disembodied-science-vs-computational-scholarship","computational-science","computational-science-automation","computational-science-literacy","epistemology","ethics","science-ethics","transparency"],"search_terms":["defense","black","box","holm"],"title":"In Defense of the Black Box","year":null,"dataSources":["DXuKbcZTirdigFKPF"]}