Pluralization and Recognition: On the Self-Misunderstanding of Postmodern Social Theorists. Honneth, A. Thesis Eleven, 31(1):24–33, February, 1992. ![Pluralization and Recognition: On the Self-Misunderstanding of Postmodern Social Theorists [link]](https://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/link.svg "link")
Paper doi abstract bibtex In what follows, I shall attempt this, first by briefly outlining the diagnosis of the times contained in the &dquo;postmodern&dquo; conception (I), then by inquiring into its theoretical framework of interpretation, which I suspect to be a Nietzschean tinged concept of aesthetic freedom (II), in order to at least sketch, in a final step, a communication-theoretic alternative interpretation (III). The guiding viewpoint of these theses is that the developmental tendencies correctly observed by postmodern theories can only be appropriately interpreted if, instead of regarding them from the poststructuralist viewpoint of an increase in aesthetic plurality and freedom, they are regarded from the perspective of a crisis in the social relations of recognition.
@article{honneth_pluralization_1992,
title = {Pluralization and {Recognition}: {On} the {Self}-{Misunderstanding} of {Postmodern} {Social} {Theorists}},
volume = {31},
issn = {0725-5136},
shorttitle = {Pluralization and {Recognition}},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/072551369203100104},
doi = {10.1177/072551369203100104},
abstract = {In what follows, I shall attempt this, first by briefly outlining the diagnosis of the times contained in the \&dquo;postmodern\&dquo; conception (I), then by inquiring into its theoretical framework of interpretation, which I suspect to be a Nietzschean tinged concept of aesthetic freedom (II), in order to at least sketch, in a final step, a communication-theoretic alternative interpretation (III). The guiding viewpoint of these theses is that the developmental tendencies correctly observed by postmodern theories can only be appropriately interpreted if, instead of regarding them from the poststructuralist viewpoint of an increase in aesthetic plurality and freedom, they are regarded from the perspective of a crisis in the social relations of recognition.},
language = {en},
number = {1},
urldate = {2021-09-24},
journal = {Thesis Eleven},
author = {Honneth, Axel},
month = feb,
year = {1992},
pages = {24--33},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"WqWTGL2WZWLhnyfHs","bibbaseid":"honneth-pluralizationandrecognitionontheselfmisunderstandingofpostmodernsocialtheorists-1992","author_short":["Honneth, A."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Pluralization and Recognition: On the Self-Misunderstanding of Postmodern Social Theorists","volume":"31","issn":"0725-5136","shorttitle":"Pluralization and Recognition","url":"https://doi.org/10.1177/072551369203100104","doi":"10.1177/072551369203100104","abstract":"In what follows, I shall attempt this, first by briefly outlining the diagnosis of the times contained in the &dquo;postmodern&dquo; conception (I), then by inquiring into its theoretical framework of interpretation, which I suspect to be a Nietzschean tinged concept of aesthetic freedom (II), in order to at least sketch, in a final step, a communication-theoretic alternative interpretation (III). The guiding viewpoint of these theses is that the developmental tendencies correctly observed by postmodern theories can only be appropriately interpreted if, instead of regarding them from the poststructuralist viewpoint of an increase in aesthetic plurality and freedom, they are regarded from the perspective of a crisis in the social relations of recognition.","language":"en","number":"1","urldate":"2021-09-24","journal":"Thesis Eleven","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Honneth"],"firstnames":["Axel"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"February","year":"1992","pages":"24–33","bibtex":"@article{honneth_pluralization_1992,\n\ttitle = {Pluralization and {Recognition}: {On} the {Self}-{Misunderstanding} of {Postmodern} {Social} {Theorists}},\n\tvolume = {31},\n\tissn = {0725-5136},\n\tshorttitle = {Pluralization and {Recognition}},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.1177/072551369203100104},\n\tdoi = {10.1177/072551369203100104},\n\tabstract = {In what follows, I shall attempt this, first by briefly outlining the diagnosis of the times contained in the \\&dquo;postmodern\\&dquo; conception (I), then by inquiring into its theoretical framework of interpretation, which I suspect to be a Nietzschean tinged concept of aesthetic freedom (II), in order to at least sketch, in a final step, a communication-theoretic alternative interpretation (III). The guiding viewpoint of these theses is that the developmental tendencies correctly observed by postmodern theories can only be appropriately interpreted if, instead of regarding them from the poststructuralist viewpoint of an increase in aesthetic plurality and freedom, they are regarded from the perspective of a crisis in the social relations of recognition.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2021-09-24},\n\tjournal = {Thesis Eleven},\n\tauthor = {Honneth, Axel},\n\tmonth = feb,\n\tyear = {1992},\n\tpages = {24--33},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Honneth, A."],"key":"honneth_pluralization_1992","id":"honneth_pluralization_1992","bibbaseid":"honneth-pluralizationandrecognitionontheselfmisunderstandingofpostmodernsocialtheorists-1992","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://doi.org/10.1177/072551369203100104"},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"html":""},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero/italoalves","dataSources":["obTLNMFqp7B9XuTYb"],"keywords":[],"search_terms":["pluralization","recognition","self","misunderstanding","postmodern","social","theorists","honneth"],"title":"Pluralization and Recognition: On the Self-Misunderstanding of Postmodern Social Theorists","year":1992}