A comparative multicentre trial of spinal needles for caesarean section. Hopkinson, J M, Samaan, A K, Russell, I F, Birks, R J, & Patrick, M R Anaesthesia, 52(10):1005–1011, October, 1997.
Paper abstract bibtex We studied 681 patients in a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, parallel group trial designed to assess the incidence of headache following spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section using four different pencil point spinal needles. The needles used were: Whitacre 25G (n = 170), Polymedic 25G (n = 170), Sprotte 24G (n = 173) and Polymedic 24G (n = 168). The incidence of all headaches prior to discharge was 11.1%. Only five headaches (0.75%) were severe with features of post dural puncture headache (PDPH) and required an epidural blood patch: Whitacre 25G = 0, Polymedic 25G = 1 (0.6%), Sprotte 24G = 2 (1.2%), Polymedic 24G = 2 (1.2%). There was no statistically significant difference between the four groups for PDPH. We conclude that all four needles studied performed satisfactorily and comparably.
@article{hopkinson_comparative_1997,
title = {A comparative multicentre trial of spinal needles for caesarean section},
volume = {52},
issn = {0003-2409},
url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9370847},
abstract = {We studied 681 patients in a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, parallel group trial designed to assess the incidence of headache following spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section using four different pencil point spinal needles. The needles used were: Whitacre 25G (n = 170), Polymedic 25G (n = 170), Sprotte 24G (n = 173) and Polymedic 24G (n = 168). The incidence of all headaches prior to discharge was 11.1\%. Only five headaches (0.75\%) were severe with features of post dural puncture headache (PDPH) and required an epidural blood patch: Whitacre 25G = 0, Polymedic 25G = 1 (0.6\%), Sprotte 24G = 2 (1.2\%), Polymedic 24G = 2 (1.2\%). There was no statistically significant difference between the four groups for PDPH. We conclude that all four needles studied performed satisfactorily and comparably.},
number = {10},
urldate = {2012-02-13TZ},
journal = {Anaesthesia},
author = {Hopkinson, J M and Samaan, A K and Russell, I F and Birks, R J and Patrick, M R},
month = oct,
year = {1997},
pmid = {9370847},
keywords = {Adult, Anesthesia, Obstetrical, Anesthesia, Spinal, Cesarean Section, Double-Blind Method, Dura Mater, Female, Headache, Humans, Marketingaktiv, Needles, Pregnancy},
pages = {1005--1011}
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"JhBWtkvQwpdScSb3N","bibbaseid":"hopkinson-samaan-russell-birks-patrick-acomparativemulticentretrialofspinalneedlesforcaesareansection-1997","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2019-02-11T12:55:00.035Z","title":"A comparative multicentre trial of spinal needles for caesarean section","author_short":["Hopkinson, J M","Samaan, A K","Russell, I F","Birks, R J","Patrick, M R"],"year":1997,"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://api.zotero.org/users/891198/collections/G8W7PDGF/items?key=K3STa8BqM9nNnwhiDoMmySmr&format=bibtex&limit=100","bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"A comparative multicentre trial of spinal needles for caesarean section","volume":"52","issn":"0003-2409","url":"http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9370847","abstract":"We studied 681 patients in a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, parallel group trial designed to assess the incidence of headache following spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section using four different pencil point spinal needles. The needles used were: Whitacre 25G (n = 170), Polymedic 25G (n = 170), Sprotte 24G (n = 173) and Polymedic 24G (n = 168). The incidence of all headaches prior to discharge was 11.1%. Only five headaches (0.75%) were severe with features of post dural puncture headache (PDPH) and required an epidural blood patch: Whitacre 25G = 0, Polymedic 25G = 1 (0.6%), Sprotte 24G = 2 (1.2%), Polymedic 24G = 2 (1.2%). There was no statistically significant difference between the four groups for PDPH. We conclude that all four needles studied performed satisfactorily and comparably.","number":"10","urldate":"2012-02-13TZ","journal":"Anaesthesia","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Hopkinson"],"firstnames":["J","M"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Samaan"],"firstnames":["A","K"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Russell"],"firstnames":["I","F"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Birks"],"firstnames":["R","J"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Patrick"],"firstnames":["M","R"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"October","year":"1997","pmid":"9370847","keywords":"Adult, Anesthesia, Obstetrical, Anesthesia, Spinal, Cesarean Section, Double-Blind Method, Dura Mater, Female, Headache, Humans, Marketingaktiv, Needles, Pregnancy","pages":"1005–1011","bibtex":"@article{hopkinson_comparative_1997,\n\ttitle = {A comparative multicentre trial of spinal needles for caesarean section},\n\tvolume = {52},\n\tissn = {0003-2409},\n\turl = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9370847},\n\tabstract = {We studied 681 patients in a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, parallel group trial designed to assess the incidence of headache following spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section using four different pencil point spinal needles. The needles used were: Whitacre 25G (n = 170), Polymedic 25G (n = 170), Sprotte 24G (n = 173) and Polymedic 24G (n = 168). The incidence of all headaches prior to discharge was 11.1\\%. Only five headaches (0.75\\%) were severe with features of post dural puncture headache (PDPH) and required an epidural blood patch: Whitacre 25G = 0, Polymedic 25G = 1 (0.6\\%), Sprotte 24G = 2 (1.2\\%), Polymedic 24G = 2 (1.2\\%). There was no statistically significant difference between the four groups for PDPH. We conclude that all four needles studied performed satisfactorily and comparably.},\n\tnumber = {10},\n\turldate = {2012-02-13TZ},\n\tjournal = {Anaesthesia},\n\tauthor = {Hopkinson, J M and Samaan, A K and Russell, I F and Birks, R J and Patrick, M R},\n\tmonth = oct,\n\tyear = {1997},\n\tpmid = {9370847},\n\tkeywords = {Adult, Anesthesia, Obstetrical, Anesthesia, Spinal, Cesarean Section, Double-Blind Method, Dura Mater, Female, Headache, Humans, Marketingaktiv, Needles, Pregnancy},\n\tpages = {1005--1011}\n}\n\n","author_short":["Hopkinson, J M","Samaan, A K","Russell, I F","Birks, R J","Patrick, M R"],"key":"hopkinson_comparative_1997","id":"hopkinson_comparative_1997","bibbaseid":"hopkinson-samaan-russell-birks-patrick-acomparativemulticentretrialofspinalneedlesforcaesareansection-1997","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9370847"},"keyword":["Adult","Anesthesia","Obstetrical","Anesthesia","Spinal","Cesarean Section","Double-Blind Method","Dura Mater","Female","Headache","Humans","Marketingaktiv","Needles","Pregnancy"],"downloads":0},"search_terms":["comparative","multicentre","trial","spinal","needles","caesarean","section","hopkinson","samaan","russell","birks","patrick"],"keywords":["adult","anesthesia","obstetrical","anesthesia","spinal","cesarean section","double-blind method","dura mater","female","headache","humans","marketingaktiv","needles","pregnancy"],"authorIDs":[],"dataSources":["tp8gMDczPFdWZfFs6"]}