{"_id":"2SDTmeSx4AkPDytk4","bibbaseid":"horne-szemis-kaur-webb-stewardson-costa-boland-optimizationtoolsforenvironmentalwaterdecisionsareviewofstrengthsweaknessesandopportunitiestoimproveadoption-2016","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2016-10-02T06:54:56.256Z","title":"Optimization Tools for Environmental Water Decisions: A Review of Strengths, Weaknesses, and Opportunities to Improve Adoption","author_short":["Horne, A.","Szemis, J. M.","Kaur, S.","Webb, J. A.","Stewardson, M. J.","Costa, A.","Boland, N."],"year":2016,"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://www.dropbox.com/s/6qxz2tlaz2bi6av/costaam.bib?dl=1","bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Optimization Tools for Environmental Water Decisions: A Review of Strengths, Weaknesses, and Opportunities to Improve Adoption","shorttitle":"Optimization Tools for Environmental Water Decisions","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Horne"],"firstnames":["A."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Szemis"],"firstnames":["J.","M."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Kaur"],"firstnames":["S."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Webb"],"firstnames":["J.","A."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Stewardson"],"firstnames":["M.","J."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Costa"],"firstnames":["A.M."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Boland"],"firstnames":["N."],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"2016","journal":"Environmental Modelling & Software","volume":"84","pages":"326–338","issn":"1364-8152","doi":"10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.06.028","urldate":"2021-05-11","abstract":"Public investment in river restoration through environmental watering has increased substantially in recent years. To sustain public support for such investment, management of environmental water must achieve the best possible outcomes in a transparent and defensible manner. The current management of environmental water relies on the ability of managers to estimate the impacts of their decisions under complex scenarios, often with multiple interdependent decisions that span over different spatial and temporal scales. Optimization modeling has been widely used in other forms of conservation management and an increasing body of literature documents the development of optimization models that could be used to improve environmental water decisions. This paper reviews this disparate research, showing that there are a range of different questions addressed using this modeling approach and that the representation of environmental outcomes varies. Future work must focus on improved adoption through engagement with end users and stakeholders during model development.","copyright":"All rights reserved","langid":"english","file":"/Users/acosta/Zotero/storage/SIKTQLAY/Horne et al. - 2016 - Optimization tools for environmental water decisio.pdf","bibtex":"@article{horne16optimization,\n title = {Optimization Tools for Environmental Water Decisions: {{A}} Review of Strengths, Weaknesses, and Opportunities to Improve Adoption},\n shorttitle = {Optimization Tools for Environmental Water Decisions},\n author = {Horne, A. and Szemis, J. M. and Kaur, S. and Webb, J. A. and Stewardson, M. J. and Costa, A.M. and Boland, N.},\n year = {2016},\n journal = {Environmental Modelling \\& Software},\n volume = {84},\n pages = {326--338},\n issn = {1364-8152},\n doi = {10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.06.028},\n urldate = {2021-05-11},\n abstract = {Public investment in river restoration through environmental watering has increased substantially in recent years. To sustain public support for such investment, management of environmental water must achieve the best possible outcomes in a transparent and defensible manner. The current management of environmental water relies on the ability of managers to estimate the impacts of their decisions under complex scenarios, often with multiple interdependent decisions that span over different spatial and temporal scales. Optimization modeling has been widely used in other forms of conservation management and an increasing body of literature documents the development of optimization models that could be used to improve environmental water decisions. This paper reviews this disparate research, showing that there are a range of different questions addressed using this modeling approach and that the representation of environmental outcomes varies. Future work must focus on improved adoption through engagement with end users and stakeholders during model development.},\n copyright = {All rights reserved},\n langid = {english},\n file = {/Users/acosta/Zotero/storage/SIKTQLAY/Horne et al. - 2016 - Optimization tools for environmental water decisio.pdf}\n}\n\n","author_short":["Horne, A.","Szemis, J. M.","Kaur, S.","Webb, J. A.","Stewardson, M. J.","Costa, A.","Boland, N."],"key":"horne16optimization","id":"horne16optimization","bibbaseid":"horne-szemis-kaur-webb-stewardson-costa-boland-optimizationtoolsforenvironmentalwaterdecisionsareviewofstrengthsweaknessesandopportunitiestoimproveadoption-2016","role":"author","urls":{},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"downloads":0},"search_terms":["optimization","tools","environmental","water","decisions","review","strengths","weaknesses","opportunities","improve","adoption","horne","szemis","kaur","webb","stewardson","costa","boland"],"keywords":[],"authorIDs":[],"dataSources":["5cbKeTnq3KKaCpYuA","tNtM4BcgqDA3TAQJ2","C8ZTSgdcqKrDKQsFr","46LeTuyTYS9vH425i","ZBX5uo2BtG4uchtse","MrfAAeH3CCWrgiXCu"]}