@article{hos97com,
  title = {A Comparison of Goodness-of-Fit Tests for the Logistic Regression Model},
  volume = {16},
  journal = {Stat Med},
  author = {Hosmer, D. W. and Hosmer, T. and {le Cessie}, S. and Lemeshow, S.},
  year = {1997},
  keywords = {simulation-setup,cumulative-sum-test,goodness-of-fit-for-binary-logistic-model,goodness-of-link-function,hosmer-lemeshow-test},
  pages = {965-980},
  citeulike-article-id = {13264327},
  posted-at = {2014-07-14 14:09:33},
  priority = {0},
  annote = {difficulty with Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic being dependent on how groups are defined;sum of squares test (see cop89unw); invalidity of naive test based on deviance; see sta09sim}
}

{"_id":"4kpHFqkHPbA4hBvh4","bibbaseid":"hosmer-hosmer-lecessie-lemeshow-acomparisonofgoodnessoffittestsforthelogisticregressionmodel-1997","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2018-06-23T20:06:37.073Z","title":"A Comparison of Goodness-of-Fit Tests for the Logistic Regression Model","author_short":["Hosmer, D. W.","Hosmer, T.","le Cessie , S.","Lemeshow, S."],"year":1997,"bibtype":"article","biburl":"http://hbiostat.org/bib/harrelfe.bib","bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"A Comparison of Goodness-of-Fit Tests for the Logistic Regression Model","volume":"16","journal":"Stat Med","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Hosmer"],"firstnames":["D.","W."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Hosmer"],"firstnames":["T."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":["le Cessie"],"lastnames":[],"firstnames":["S."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Lemeshow"],"firstnames":["S."],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"1997","keywords":"simulation-setup,cumulative-sum-test,goodness-of-fit-for-binary-logistic-model,goodness-of-link-function,hosmer-lemeshow-test","pages":"965-980","citeulike-article-id":"13264327","posted-at":"2014-07-14 14:09:33","priority":"0","annote":"difficulty with Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic being dependent on how groups are defined;sum of squares test (see cop89unw); invalidity of naive test based on deviance; see sta09sim","bibtex":"@article{hos97com,\n title = {A Comparison of Goodness-of-Fit Tests for the Logistic Regression Model},\n volume = {16},\n journal = {Stat Med},\n author = {Hosmer, D. W. and Hosmer, T. and {le Cessie}, S. and Lemeshow, S.},\n year = {1997},\n keywords = {simulation-setup,cumulative-sum-test,goodness-of-fit-for-binary-logistic-model,goodness-of-link-function,hosmer-lemeshow-test},\n pages = {965-980},\n citeulike-article-id = {13264327},\n posted-at = {2014-07-14 14:09:33},\n priority = {0},\n annote = {difficulty with Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic being dependent on how groups are defined;sum of squares test (see cop89unw); invalidity of naive test based on deviance; see sta09sim}\n}\n\n","author_short":["Hosmer, D. W.","Hosmer, T.","le Cessie , S.","Lemeshow, S."],"key":"hos97com","id":"hos97com","bibbaseid":"hosmer-hosmer-lecessie-lemeshow-acomparisonofgoodnessoffittestsforthelogisticregressionmodel-1997","role":"author","urls":{},"keyword":["simulation-setup","cumulative-sum-test","goodness-of-fit-for-binary-logistic-model","goodness-of-link-function","hosmer-lemeshow-test"],"downloads":0},"search_terms":["comparison","goodness","fit","tests","logistic","regression","model","hosmer","hosmer","le cessie ","lemeshow"],"keywords":["cumulative-sum-test","goodness-of-fit-for-binary-logistic-model","goodness-of-link-function","hosmer-lemeshow-test","simulation-setup","*import"],"authorIDs":[],"dataSources":["mEQakjn8ggpMsnGJi"]}