@article{Houchin2012The,
  author = {Houchin, T. M. and Ranseen, J. and Hash, P. A. and Bartnicki, D. J.},
  title = {The parental alienation debate belongs in the courtroom, not in DSM-5},
  journal = {Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law},
  address = {USA},
  year = {2012},
  volume = {40},
  number = {1},
  pages = {127--31},
  isbn = {1943-3662 (Electronic) 1093-6793 (Linking)},
  abstract = {The DSM-5 Task Force is presently considering whether to adopt parental alienation disorder (PAD) as a mental illness. Although controversy has surrounded PAD since its inception in 1985, pro-PAD groups and individuals have breathed new life into the push to establish it as a mental health diagnosis. In this analysis, we argue that it would be a serious mistake to adopt parental alienation disorder as a formal mental illness in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5).},
  keywords = {Adult; Child; Child Custody/ legislation & jurisprudence; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Expert Testimony/ legislation & jurisprudence; Humans; Mental Disorders/ diagnosis/psychology; Parents/ psychology; Persuasive Communication; Reactive Attachment Disorder/ diagnosis/psychology; Reproducibility of Results; Social Alienation/ psychology; Syndrome; Classification; Critics},
  language = {English}
}

{"_id":"Fb8BgtAe5xE7C3K8S","bibbaseid":"houchin-ranseen-hash-bartnicki-theparentalalienationdebatebelongsinthecourtroomnotindsm5-2012","author_short":["Houchin, T. M.","Ranseen, J.","Hash, P. A.","Bartnicki, D. J."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Houchin"],"firstnames":["T.","M."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Ranseen"],"firstnames":["J."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Hash"],"firstnames":["P.","A."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Bartnicki"],"firstnames":["D.","J."],"suffixes":[]}],"title":"The parental alienation debate belongs in the courtroom, not in DSM-5","journal":"Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law","address":"USA","year":"2012","volume":"40","number":"1","pages":"127–31","isbn":"1943-3662 (Electronic) 1093-6793 (Linking)","abstract":"The DSM-5 Task Force is presently considering whether to adopt parental alienation disorder (PAD) as a mental illness. Although controversy has surrounded PAD since its inception in 1985, pro-PAD groups and individuals have breathed new life into the push to establish it as a mental health diagnosis. In this analysis, we argue that it would be a serious mistake to adopt parental alienation disorder as a formal mental illness in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5).","keywords":"Adult; Child; Child Custody/ legislation & jurisprudence; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Expert Testimony/ legislation & jurisprudence; Humans; Mental Disorders/ diagnosis/psychology; Parents/ psychology; Persuasive Communication; Reactive Attachment Disorder/ diagnosis/psychology; Reproducibility of Results; Social Alienation/ psychology; Syndrome; Classification; Critics","language":"English","bibtex":"@article{Houchin2012The,\n author = {Houchin, T. M. and Ranseen, J. and Hash, P. A. and Bartnicki, D. J.},\n title = {The parental alienation debate belongs in the courtroom, not in DSM-5},\n journal = {Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law},\n address = {USA},\n year = {2012},\n volume = {40},\n number = {1},\n pages = {127--31},\n isbn = {1943-3662 (Electronic) 1093-6793 (Linking)},\n abstract = {The DSM-5 Task Force is presently considering whether to adopt parental alienation disorder (PAD) as a mental illness. Although controversy has surrounded PAD since its inception in 1985, pro-PAD groups and individuals have breathed new life into the push to establish it as a mental health diagnosis. In this analysis, we argue that it would be a serious mistake to adopt parental alienation disorder as a formal mental illness in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5).},\n keywords = {Adult; Child; Child Custody/ legislation & jurisprudence; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Expert Testimony/ legislation & jurisprudence; Humans; Mental Disorders/ diagnosis/psychology; Parents/ psychology; Persuasive Communication; Reactive Attachment Disorder/ diagnosis/psychology; Reproducibility of Results; Social Alienation/ psychology; Syndrome; Classification; Critics},\n language = {English}\n}\n\n","author_short":["Houchin, T. M.","Ranseen, J.","Hash, P. A.","Bartnicki, D. J."],"key":"Houchin2012The","id":"Houchin2012The","bibbaseid":"houchin-ranseen-hash-bartnicki-theparentalalienationdebatebelongsinthecourtroomnotindsm5-2012","role":"author","urls":{},"keyword":["Adult; Child; Child Custody/ legislation & jurisprudence; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Expert Testimony/ legislation & jurisprudence; Humans; Mental Disorders/ diagnosis/psychology; Parents/ psychology; Persuasive Communication; Reactive Attachment Disorder/ diagnosis/psychology; Reproducibility of Results; Social Alienation/ psychology; Syndrome; Classification; Critics"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/f/v9y3N5nSNJCGbutCQ/pasg_all_fields_new.bib","dataSources":["2znj6DDoAPkzAbPbu","dpJ65KQZAq5QWGLhR","fKeAv25rm3KGeNNgj","PnAcKDiPuitiWMt8Q"],"keywords":["adult; child; child custody/ legislation & jurisprudence; diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders; expert testimony/ legislation & jurisprudence; humans; mental disorders/ diagnosis/psychology; parents/ psychology; persuasive communication; reactive attachment disorder/ diagnosis/psychology; reproducibility of results; social alienation/ psychology; syndrome; classification; critics"],"search_terms":["parental","alienation","debate","belongs","courtroom","dsm","houchin","ranseen","hash","bartnicki"],"title":"The parental alienation debate belongs in the courtroom, not in DSM-5","year":2012}