Sources of U.S. Wealth Inequality: Past, Present, and Future. Hubmer, J., Krussell, P., & Smith 2020. Unpublished manuscript
Sources of U.S. Wealth Inequality: Past, Present, and Future [link]Link  abstract   bibtex   
This paper employs a benchmark heterogeneous-agent macroeconomic model to examine a number of plausible drivers of the rise in wealth inequality in the U.S. over the last forty years. We find that the significant drop in tax progressivity starting in the late 1970s is the most important driver of the increase in wealth inequality since then. The sharp observed increases in earnings inequality and the falling labor share over the recent decades fall far short of accounting for the data. The model can also account for the dynamics of wealth inequality over the period-in particular the observed U-shape-and here the observed variations in asset returns are key. Returns on assets matter because portfolios of households differ systematically both across and within wealth groups, a feature in our model that also helps us to match, quantitatively, a key long-run feature of wealth and earnings distributions: the former is much more highly concentrated than the latter.
@unpublished{Hubmeretal2020,
  title = {Sources of {{U}}.{{S}}. Wealth Inequality: Past, Present, and Future},
  author = {Hubmer, Joachim and Krussell, Per and Smith, Jr., Anthony A.},
  year = {2020},
  url = {https://www.nber.org/books-and-chapters/nber-macroeconomics-annual-2020-volume-35/sources-us-wealth-inequality-past-present-and-future},
  abstract = {This paper employs a benchmark heterogeneous-agent macroeconomic model to examine a number of plausible drivers of the rise in wealth inequality in the U.S. over the last forty years. We find that the significant drop in tax progressivity starting in the late 1970s is the most important driver of the increase in wealth inequality since then. The sharp observed increases in earnings inequality and the falling labor share over the recent decades fall far short of accounting for the data. The model can also account for the dynamics of wealth inequality over the period-in particular the observed U-shape-and here the observed variations in asset returns are key. Returns on assets matter because portfolios of households differ systematically both across and within wealth groups, a feature in our model that also helps us to match, quantitatively, a key long-run feature of wealth and earnings distributions: the former is much more highly concentrated than the latter.},
  keywords = {Determinants of Wealth and Wealth Inequality},
  note = {Unpublished manuscript}
}

Downloads: 0