Usability testing of a prototype Phone Oximeter with healthcare providers in high- and low-medical resource environments

Usability testing of a prototype Phone Oximeter with healthcare providers in high- and low-medical resource environments. Hudson, J., Nguku, S., M., Sleiman, J., Karlen, W., Dumont, G., A., Petersen, C., Warriner, C., B., & Ansermino, J., M. Anaesthesia, 67(9):957-67, 2012.

Paper

Usability testing of a prototype Phone Oximeter with healthcare providers in high- and low-medical resource environments [link]

Website doi abstract bibtex

To increase the use of pulse oximetry by capitalise on the wide availability of mobile phones, we have designed, developed and evaluated a prototype pulse oximeter interfaced to a mobile phone. Usability of this Phone Oximeter was tested as part of a rapid prototyping process. Phase 1 of the study (20 subjects) was performed in Canada. Users performed 23 tasks, while thinking aloud. Time for completion of tasks and analysis of user response to a mobile phone usability questionnaire were used to evaluate usability. Five interface improvements were made to the prototype before evaluation in Phase 2 (15 subjects) in Uganda. The lack of previous pulse oximetry experience and mobile phone use increased median (IQR [range]) time taken to perform tasks from 219 (160–247 [118–274]) s in Phase 1 to 228 (151–501 [111–2661]) s in Phase 2. User feedback was positive and overall usability high (Phase 1 – 82%, Phase 2 – 78%).

@article{
 title = {Usability testing of a prototype Phone Oximeter with healthcare providers in high- and low-medical resource environments},
 type = {article},
 year = {2012},
 pages = {957-67},
 volume = {67},
 websites = {http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07196.x},
 day = {2},
 id = {79b0a170-90c5-368e-9fb4-463db36f6302},
 created = {2011-05-12T18:45:03.000Z},
 accessed = {2012-08-07},
 file_attached = {true},
 profile_id = {6d353feb-efe4-367e-84a2-0815eb9ca878},
 last_modified = {2022-09-04T18:12:06.533Z},
 read = {true},
 starred = {false},
 authored = {true},
 confirmed = {true},
 hidden = {false},
 citation_key = {Hudson2012},
 notes = {IF-2018: 5.88},
 folder_uuids = {f1f67efc-95a7-4f1a-b181-c3670c667a34,b7673acf-cf74-4294-9d7a-ff63418309e7,9aa961a4-04a6-4a65-b081-d534c7a81a35,4afa922c-d8d6-102e-ac9a-0024e85ead87,633ed26f-2916-4068-84dc-6db4ea545a28,ca44f58c-c969-466a-8b92-fcbba0899260},
 private_publication = {false},
 abstract = {To increase the use of pulse oximetry by capitalise on the wide availability of mobile phones, we have designed, developed and evaluated a prototype pulse oximeter interfaced to a mobile phone. Usability of this Phone Oximeter was tested as part of a rapid prototyping process. Phase 1 of the study (20 subjects) was performed in Canada. Users performed 23 tasks, while thinking aloud. Time for completion of tasks and analysis of user response to a mobile phone usability questionnaire were used to evaluate usability. Five interface improvements were made to the prototype before evaluation in Phase 2 (15 subjects) in Uganda. The lack of previous pulse oximetry experience and mobile phone use increased median (IQR [range]) time taken to perform tasks from 219 (160–247 [118–274]) s in Phase 1 to 228 (151–501 [111–2661]) s in Phase 2. User feedback was positive and overall usability high (Phase 1 – 82%, Phase 2 – 78%).},
 bibtype = {article},
 author = {Hudson, Jacqueline and Nguku, S. M. and Sleiman, Jules and Karlen, Walter and Dumont, Guy A and Petersen, Chris and Warriner, C. B. and Ansermino, J Mark},
 doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07196.x},
 journal = {Anaesthesia},
 number = {9}
}

Downloads: 0