@INPROCEEDINGS{Hustadt+Schmidt@IJCAI1997,
 AUTHOR    = {Hustadt, U. and Schmidt, R. A.},
 MONTH     = {August},
 YEAR      = {1997},
 TITLE     = {On Evaluating Decision Procedures for Modal Logics},
 EDITOR    = {Pollack, M.},
 BOOKTITLE = {Proceedings of the 
 Fifteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI'97)
 [Nagoya, Japan, 23-29 August 1997]},
 VOLUME    = {1},
 PUBLISHER = {Morgan Kaufmann},
 PAGES     = {202-207},
 URL       = {Hustadt+Schmidt@IJCAI1997.pdf},
 NOTE      = {An extended version is available as Research Report
 MPI-I-97-2-003, Max-Planck-Institut f{\"u}r Informatik,
 Saarbr{\"u}cken, Germany.},
 ABSTRACT = {This paper investigates the evaluation method of decision
 procedures for multi-modal logic proposed by Giunchiglia and
 Sebastiani as an adaptation from the evaluation method of Mitchell et
 al. of decision procedures for propositional logic. We compare three
 different theorem proving approaches, namely, the Davis-Putnam-based
 procedure KSAT, the tableaux-based system KRIS and a translation
 approach combined with first-order resolution. Our results do not
 support the claims of Giunchiglia and Sebastiani concerning the
 computational superiority of KSAT over KRIS, and an easy-hard-easy
 pattern for randomly generated modal formulae.}, 
}

{"_id":"EfyMBmnoFLTjipt7u","bibbaseid":"hustadt-schmidt-onevaluatingdecisionproceduresformodallogics-1997","author_short":["Hustadt, U.","Schmidt, R. A."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"inproceedings","type":"inproceedings","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Hustadt"],"firstnames":["U."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Schmidt"],"firstnames":["R.","A."],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"August","year":"1997","title":"On Evaluating Decision Procedures for Modal Logics","editor":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Pollack"],"firstnames":["M."],"suffixes":[]}],"booktitle":"Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI'97) [Nagoya, Japan, 23-29 August 1997]","volume":"1","publisher":"Morgan Kaufmann","pages":"202-207","url":"Hustadt+Schmidt@IJCAI1997.pdf","note":"An extended version is available as Research Report MPI-I-97-2-003, Max-Planck-Institut für Informatik, Saarbrücken, Germany.","abstract":"This paper investigates the evaluation method of decision procedures for multi-modal logic proposed by Giunchiglia and Sebastiani as an adaptation from the evaluation method of Mitchell et al. of decision procedures for propositional logic. We compare three different theorem proving approaches, namely, the Davis-Putnam-based procedure KSAT, the tableaux-based system KRIS and a translation approach combined with first-order resolution. Our results do not support the claims of Giunchiglia and Sebastiani concerning the computational superiority of KSAT over KRIS, and an easy-hard-easy pattern for randomly generated modal formulae.","bibtex":"@INPROCEEDINGS{Hustadt+Schmidt@IJCAI1997,\n AUTHOR = {Hustadt, U. and Schmidt, R. A.},\n MONTH = {August},\n YEAR = {1997},\n TITLE = {On Evaluating Decision Procedures for Modal Logics},\n EDITOR = {Pollack, M.},\n BOOKTITLE = {Proceedings of the \n Fifteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI'97)\n [Nagoya, Japan, 23-29 August 1997]},\n VOLUME = {1},\n PUBLISHER = {Morgan Kaufmann},\n PAGES = {202-207},\n URL = {Hustadt+Schmidt@IJCAI1997.pdf},\n NOTE = {An extended version is available as Research Report\n MPI-I-97-2-003, Max-Planck-Institut f{\\\"u}r Informatik,\n Saarbr{\\\"u}cken, Germany.},\n ABSTRACT = {This paper investigates the evaluation method of decision\n procedures for multi-modal logic proposed by Giunchiglia and\n Sebastiani as an adaptation from the evaluation method of Mitchell et\n al. of decision procedures for propositional logic. We compare three\n different theorem proving approaches, namely, the Davis-Putnam-based\n procedure KSAT, the tableaux-based system KRIS and a translation\n approach combined with first-order resolution. Our results do not\n support the claims of Giunchiglia and Sebastiani concerning the\n computational superiority of KSAT over KRIS, and an easy-hard-easy\n pattern for randomly generated modal formulae.}, \n}\n\n\n","author_short":["Hustadt, U.","Schmidt, R. A."],"editor_short":["Pollack, M."],"key":"Hustadt+Schmidt@IJCAI1997","id":"Hustadt+Schmidt@IJCAI1997","bibbaseid":"hustadt-schmidt-onevaluatingdecisionproceduresformodallogics-1997","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://cgi.csc.liv.ac.uk/~ullrich/publications/Hustadt+Schmidt@IJCAI1997.pdf"},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"inproceedings","biburl":"http://cgi.csc.liv.ac.uk/~ullrich/publications/all.bib?authorFirst=1","dataSources":["WhiGijHmCtTSdLaAj"],"keywords":[],"search_terms":["evaluating","decision","procedures","modal","logics","hustadt","schmidt"],"title":"On Evaluating Decision Procedures for Modal Logics","year":1997}