Language-Relative Construal of Individuation Constrained by Universal Ontology: Revisiting Language Universals and Linguistic Relativity. Imai, M. & Mazuka, R. Cognit Sci, 31(3):385–413, 2007. abstract bibtex Objects and substances bear fundamentally different ontologies. In this article, we examine the relations between language, the ontological distinction with respect to individuation, and the world. Specifically, in cross-linguistic developmental studies that follow Imai and Gentner (1997), we examine the question of whether language influences our thought in different forms, like (1) whether the language-specific construal of entities found in a word extension context (Imai & Gentner, 1997) is also found in a nonlinguistic classification context; (2) whether the presence of labels per se, independent of the count-mass syntax, fosters ontology-based classification; (3) in what way, if at all, the count-mass syntax that accompanies a label changes English speakers' default construal of a given entity? On the basis of the results, we argue that the ontological distinction concerning individuation is universally shared and functions as a constraint on early learning of words. At the same time, language influences one's construal of entities cross-lingistically and developmentally, and causes a temporary change of construal within a single language. We provide a detailed discussion of how each of these three ways language may affect the construal of entities, and discuss how our universally possessed knowledge interacts with language both within a single language and in cross-linguistic context.
@Article{Imai2007,
author = {Mutsumi Imai and Reiko Mazuka},
journal = {Cognit Sci},
title = {Language-Relative Construal of Individuation Constrained by Universal Ontology: Revisiting Language Universals and Linguistic Relativity},
year = {2007},
number = {3},
pages = {385--413},
volume = {31},
abstract = {Objects and substances bear fundamentally different ontologies. In
this article, we examine the relations between language, the ontological
distinction with respect to individuation, and the world. Specifically,
in cross-linguistic developmental studies that follow Imai and Gentner
(1997), we examine the question of whether language influences our
thought in different forms, like (1) whether the language-specific
construal of entities found in a word extension context (Imai & Gentner,
1997) is also found in a nonlinguistic classification context; (2)
whether the presence of labels per se, independent of the count-mass
syntax, fosters ontology-based classification; (3) in what way, if
at all, the count-mass syntax that accompanies a label changes English
speakers' default construal of a given entity? On the basis of the
results, we argue that the ontological distinction concerning individuation
is universally shared and functions as a constraint on early learning
of words. At the same time, language influences one's construal of
entities cross-lingistically and developmentally, and causes a temporary
change of construal within a single language. We provide a detailed
discussion of how each of these three ways language may affect the
construal of entities, and discuss how our universally possessed
knowledge interacts with language both within a single language and
in cross-linguistic context.},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"exx4muyEk4m8bZhar","bibbaseid":"imai-mazuka-languagerelativeconstrualofindividuationconstrainedbyuniversalontologyrevisitinglanguageuniversalsandlinguisticrelativity-2007","author_short":["Imai, M.","Mazuka, R."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","author":[{"firstnames":["Mutsumi"],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Imai"],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":["Reiko"],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Mazuka"],"suffixes":[]}],"journal":"Cognit Sci","title":"Language-Relative Construal of Individuation Constrained by Universal Ontology: Revisiting Language Universals and Linguistic Relativity","year":"2007","number":"3","pages":"385–413","volume":"31","abstract":"Objects and substances bear fundamentally different ontologies. In this article, we examine the relations between language, the ontological distinction with respect to individuation, and the world. Specifically, in cross-linguistic developmental studies that follow Imai and Gentner (1997), we examine the question of whether language influences our thought in different forms, like (1) whether the language-specific construal of entities found in a word extension context (Imai & Gentner, 1997) is also found in a nonlinguistic classification context; (2) whether the presence of labels per se, independent of the count-mass syntax, fosters ontology-based classification; (3) in what way, if at all, the count-mass syntax that accompanies a label changes English speakers' default construal of a given entity? On the basis of the results, we argue that the ontological distinction concerning individuation is universally shared and functions as a constraint on early learning of words. At the same time, language influences one's construal of entities cross-lingistically and developmentally, and causes a temporary change of construal within a single language. We provide a detailed discussion of how each of these three ways language may affect the construal of entities, and discuss how our universally possessed knowledge interacts with language both within a single language and in cross-linguistic context.","bibtex":"@Article{Imai2007,\n author = {Mutsumi Imai and Reiko Mazuka},\n journal = {Cognit Sci},\n title = {Language-Relative Construal of Individuation Constrained by Universal Ontology: Revisiting Language Universals and Linguistic Relativity},\n year = {2007},\n number = {3},\n pages = {385--413},\n volume = {31},\n abstract = {Objects and substances bear fundamentally different ontologies. In\n\tthis article, we examine the relations between language, the ontological\n\tdistinction with respect to individuation, and the world. Specifically,\n\tin cross-linguistic developmental studies that follow Imai and Gentner\n\t(1997), we examine the question of whether language influences our\n\tthought in different forms, like (1) whether the language-specific\n\tconstrual of entities found in a word extension context (Imai & Gentner,\n\t1997) is also found in a nonlinguistic classification context; (2)\n\twhether the presence of labels per se, independent of the count-mass\n\tsyntax, fosters ontology-based classification; (3) in what way, if\n\tat all, the count-mass syntax that accompanies a label changes English\n\tspeakers' default construal of a given entity? On the basis of the\n\tresults, we argue that the ontological distinction concerning individuation\n\tis universally shared and functions as a constraint on early learning\n\tof words. At the same time, language influences one's construal of\n\tentities cross-lingistically and developmentally, and causes a temporary\n\tchange of construal within a single language. We provide a detailed\n\tdiscussion of how each of these three ways language may affect the\n\tconstrual of entities, and discuss how our universally possessed\n\tknowledge interacts with language both within a single language and\n\tin cross-linguistic context.},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Imai, M.","Mazuka, R."],"key":"Imai2007","id":"Imai2007","bibbaseid":"imai-mazuka-languagerelativeconstrualofindividuationconstrainedbyuniversalontologyrevisitinglanguageuniversalsandlinguisticrelativity-2007","role":"author","urls":{},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://endress.org/publications/ansgar.bib","dataSources":["xPGxHAeh3vZpx4yyE","TXa55dQbNoWnaGmMq"],"keywords":[],"search_terms":["language","relative","construal","individuation","constrained","universal","ontology","revisiting","language","universals","linguistic","relativity","imai","mazuka"],"title":"Language-Relative Construal of Individuation Constrained by Universal Ontology: Revisiting Language Universals and Linguistic Relativity","year":2007}