Resistance of different wood-based materials against mould fungi: a comparison of methods. Imken, A. A., Brischke, C., Kögel, S., Krause, K. C., & Mai, C. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products, 78(4):661–671, July, 2020.
Paper doi abstract bibtex Wood-based materials are generally prone to colonization by mould fungi and other discoloring microorganisms, but their resistance to fungal discoloration varies. Different standardized test methods for determining the susceptibility to mould fungi have been used to evaluate various wood-based materials, but the obtained results suggest that mould resistance depends on the method applied. Therefore, this study aimed at a comparative evaluation of two commonly used methods for determining the mould resistance of wood-based materials, i.e. the chamber method according to BS 3900—Part G6 and the malt agar plate method according to ISO 16869. Solid wood, wood fiber insulation boards and wood polymer composites were inoculated, incubated for different time intervals, and assessed with regard to superficial mould growth. Mould growth ratings obtained with the two methods did not correlate well, neither within one type of material nor across different materials, which can be attributed to higher moisture contents and additional nutrients available for the specimens in the agar plate test compared to those in the chamber test. It was concluded, that the experimental set up could have an overriding effect on the results of mould resistance tests.
@article{imken_resistance_2020,
title = {Resistance of different wood-based materials against mould fungi: a comparison of methods},
volume = {78},
issn = {1436-736X},
shorttitle = {Resistance of different wood-based materials against mould fungi},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-020-01554-5},
doi = {10.1007/s00107-020-01554-5},
abstract = {Wood-based materials are generally prone to colonization by mould fungi and other discoloring microorganisms, but their resistance to fungal discoloration varies. Different standardized test methods for determining the susceptibility to mould fungi have been used to evaluate various wood-based materials, but the obtained results suggest that mould resistance depends on the method applied. Therefore, this study aimed at a comparative evaluation of two commonly used methods for determining the mould resistance of wood-based materials, i.e. the chamber method according to BS 3900—Part G6 and the malt agar plate method according to ISO 16869. Solid wood, wood fiber insulation boards and wood polymer composites were inoculated, incubated for different time intervals, and assessed with regard to superficial mould growth. Mould growth ratings obtained with the two methods did not correlate well, neither within one type of material nor across different materials, which can be attributed to higher moisture contents and additional nutrients available for the specimens in the agar plate test compared to those in the chamber test. It was concluded, that the experimental set up could have an overriding effect on the results of mould resistance tests.},
language = {en},
number = {4},
urldate = {2020-07-12},
journal = {European Journal of Wood and Wood Products},
author = {Imken, Arne A.P. and Brischke, Christian and Kögel, Sebastian and Krause, Kim C. and Mai, Carsten},
month = jul,
year = {2020},
pages = {661--671},
file = {Springer Full Text PDF:C\:\\Users\\Eva\\Zotero\\storage\\7MM2CVDT\\Imken et al. - 2020 - Resistance of different wood-based materials again.pdf:application/pdf},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"AE6Xf8hExbuSrarYT","bibbaseid":"imken-brischke-kgel-krause-mai-resistanceofdifferentwoodbasedmaterialsagainstmouldfungiacomparisonofmethods-2020","authorIDs":["22yYfbRGCFGB938K3","8J9c5GG4aQSiKKmLq","G5cC4b3cejcKmaY7Y","MCso7Jj34SFakCChu","MjmGqXhQjT7Rh2uD9","NML3mczNDGTmPvrQF","R2JvChror5atFzZ7j","SzMMLqSmBkEcTeSLP","T8ktP8TJPkJDW9ygf","XLjifkdJS5GBMoDMr","a5pHZC3XxbtfttfYR","a6F4rbGRsWk8RBFzk","cuZe44EEN6n47EwsZ","kvNej8ys5SncgvfgP","pTAfYjpJun9LnrXuX","ztz7GMHAihYzkD7Kq"],"author_short":["Imken, A. A.","Brischke, C.","Kögel, S.","Krause, K. C.","Mai, C."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Resistance of different wood-based materials against mould fungi: a comparison of methods","volume":"78","issn":"1436-736X","shorttitle":"Resistance of different wood-based materials against mould fungi","url":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-020-01554-5","doi":"10.1007/s00107-020-01554-5","abstract":"Wood-based materials are generally prone to colonization by mould fungi and other discoloring microorganisms, but their resistance to fungal discoloration varies. Different standardized test methods for determining the susceptibility to mould fungi have been used to evaluate various wood-based materials, but the obtained results suggest that mould resistance depends on the method applied. Therefore, this study aimed at a comparative evaluation of two commonly used methods for determining the mould resistance of wood-based materials, i.e. the chamber method according to BS 3900—Part G6 and the malt agar plate method according to ISO 16869. Solid wood, wood fiber insulation boards and wood polymer composites were inoculated, incubated for different time intervals, and assessed with regard to superficial mould growth. Mould growth ratings obtained with the two methods did not correlate well, neither within one type of material nor across different materials, which can be attributed to higher moisture contents and additional nutrients available for the specimens in the agar plate test compared to those in the chamber test. It was concluded, that the experimental set up could have an overriding effect on the results of mould resistance tests.","language":"en","number":"4","urldate":"2020-07-12","journal":"European Journal of Wood and Wood Products","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Imken"],"firstnames":["Arne","A.P."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Brischke"],"firstnames":["Christian"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Kögel"],"firstnames":["Sebastian"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Krause"],"firstnames":["Kim","C."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Mai"],"firstnames":["Carsten"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"July","year":"2020","pages":"661–671","file":"Springer Full Text PDF:C\\:\\\\Users\\\\Eva\\\\Zotero\\\\storage\\\\7MM2CVDT\\\\Imken et al. - 2020 - Resistance of different wood-based materials again.pdf:application/pdf","bibtex":"@article{imken_resistance_2020,\n\ttitle = {Resistance of different wood-based materials against mould fungi: a comparison of methods},\n\tvolume = {78},\n\tissn = {1436-736X},\n\tshorttitle = {Resistance of different wood-based materials against mould fungi},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-020-01554-5},\n\tdoi = {10.1007/s00107-020-01554-5},\n\tabstract = {Wood-based materials are generally prone to colonization by mould fungi and other discoloring microorganisms, but their resistance to fungal discoloration varies. Different standardized test methods for determining the susceptibility to mould fungi have been used to evaluate various wood-based materials, but the obtained results suggest that mould resistance depends on the method applied. Therefore, this study aimed at a comparative evaluation of two commonly used methods for determining the mould resistance of wood-based materials, i.e. the chamber method according to BS 3900—Part G6 and the malt agar plate method according to ISO 16869. Solid wood, wood fiber insulation boards and wood polymer composites were inoculated, incubated for different time intervals, and assessed with regard to superficial mould growth. Mould growth ratings obtained with the two methods did not correlate well, neither within one type of material nor across different materials, which can be attributed to higher moisture contents and additional nutrients available for the specimens in the agar plate test compared to those in the chamber test. It was concluded, that the experimental set up could have an overriding effect on the results of mould resistance tests.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {4},\n\turldate = {2020-07-12},\n\tjournal = {European Journal of Wood and Wood Products},\n\tauthor = {Imken, Arne A.P. and Brischke, Christian and Kögel, Sebastian and Krause, Kim C. and Mai, Carsten},\n\tmonth = jul,\n\tyear = {2020},\n\tpages = {661--671},\n\tfile = {Springer Full Text PDF:C\\:\\\\Users\\\\Eva\\\\Zotero\\\\storage\\\\7MM2CVDT\\\\Imken et al. - 2020 - Resistance of different wood-based materials again.pdf:application/pdf},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Imken, A. A.","Brischke, C.","Kögel, S.","Krause, K. C.","Mai, C."],"key":"imken_resistance_2020","id":"imken_resistance_2020","bibbaseid":"imken-brischke-kgel-krause-mai-resistanceofdifferentwoodbasedmaterialsagainstmouldfungiacomparisonofmethods-2020","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-020-01554-5"},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{"brischke, c":"https://www.uni-goettingen.de/en/vorschau_52e1721480b78f8e0c07b23d1dcf425c/584643.html"}},"downloads":0},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://owncloud.gwdg.de/index.php/s/UdLcSEWHsbZTh23/download","creationDate":"2020-07-02T22:44:53.168Z","downloads":0,"keywords":[],"search_terms":["resistance","different","wood","based","materials","against","mould","fungi","comparison","methods","imken","brischke","kögel","krause","mai"],"title":"Resistance of different wood-based materials against mould fungi: a comparison of methods","year":2020,"dataSources":["ddTKpzWH7MJNFkkP2","tc4oDEtdwbL9JNefD","6ozGo6MxBB3WFx843"]}