Management of potential drug interactions in community pharmacies: a questionnaire-based survey in Switzerland. Indermitte, J., Erba, L., Beutler, M., Bruppacher, R., Haefeli, W. E, & Hersberger, K. E European journal of clinical pharmacology, 63(3):297–305, March, 2007. doi abstract bibtex OBJECTIVE: To analyze the current drug-interaction management in Swiss community pharmacies, with a particular focus on electronic systems, and to compare the results with those expressed by German general practitioners in a recent survey. METHODS: Data were collected with a postal questionnaire which was randomly sent to 500 out of 833 community pharmacies in the German part of Switzerland. RESULTS: The response rate was 57.4%, and only 24.7% pharmacists reported that they were confronted less than daily with potential drug interactions. Use of computer software to identify potential drug interactions was widespread in community pharmacies (90.2%), and the software was the primary source of information (81.2 +/- 29.6%). The quality of the interaction software was judged sensitive (identifying all dangerous interactions) by 80.5 +/- 21.5%, but specific (identifying only relevant interactions) by only 38.3 +/- 32%. Pharmacists declared a low override rate (14%) of drug interaction alerts, although unjustified alerts were reported by 60.6 +/- 33.1%. In contrast to general practitioners, pharmacists opted less often for information on the mechanism of the interaction, and more frequently for details for dose adjustment. Both groups complained about deficient information on non-interacting alternatives. CONCLUSION: The information needs of community pharmacists differed considerably from general practitioners, and pharmacists were overwhelmed by inappropriate alerts because of a lack of specificity of their drug-interaction systems. Substantial improvement of drug-interaction software systems is thus required at least in two important aspects, the suppression of inappropriate alerts and the tailoring to the needs of the user.
@article{indermitte_management_2007,
title = {Management of potential drug interactions in community pharmacies: a questionnaire-based survey in {Switzerland}},
volume = {63},
issn = {0031-6970},
shorttitle = {Management of potential drug interactions in community pharmacies},
doi = {10.1007/s00228-006-0237-5},
abstract = {OBJECTIVE: To analyze the current drug-interaction management in Swiss community pharmacies, with a particular focus on electronic systems, and to compare the results with those expressed by German general practitioners in a recent survey.
METHODS: Data were collected with a postal questionnaire which was randomly sent to 500 out of 833 community pharmacies in the German part of Switzerland.
RESULTS: The response rate was 57.4\%, and only 24.7\% pharmacists reported that they were confronted less than daily with potential drug interactions. Use of computer software to identify potential drug interactions was widespread in community pharmacies (90.2\%), and the software was the primary source of information (81.2 +/- 29.6\%). The quality of the interaction software was judged sensitive (identifying all dangerous interactions) by 80.5 +/- 21.5\%, but specific (identifying only relevant interactions) by only 38.3 +/- 32\%. Pharmacists declared a low override rate (14\%) of drug interaction alerts, although unjustified alerts were reported by 60.6 +/- 33.1\%. In contrast to general practitioners, pharmacists opted less often for information on the mechanism of the interaction, and more frequently for details for dose adjustment. Both groups complained about deficient information on non-interacting alternatives.
CONCLUSION: The information needs of community pharmacists differed considerably from general practitioners, and pharmacists were overwhelmed by inappropriate alerts because of a lack of specificity of their drug-interaction systems. Substantial improvement of drug-interaction software systems is thus required at least in two important aspects, the suppression of inappropriate alerts and the tailoring to the needs of the user.},
language = {eng},
number = {3},
journal = {European journal of clinical pharmacology},
author = {Indermitte, Jörg and Erba, Laura and Beutler, Marianne and Bruppacher, Rudolf and Haefeli, Walter E and Hersberger, Kurt E},
month = mar,
year = {2007},
pmid = {17216436},
keywords = {Adult, Communication, Drug Information Services, Drug Interactions, Female, Humans, Male, Medication Errors, Middle Aged, Perception, Pharmacies, Questionnaires, Software},
pages = {297--305}
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"8pWwfFWjWoj5AH52k","bibbaseid":"indermitte-erba-beutler-bruppacher-haefeli-hersberger-managementofpotentialdruginteractionsincommunitypharmaciesaquestionnairebasedsurveyinswitzerland-2007","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2018-12-05T13:23:20.077Z","title":"Management of potential drug interactions in community pharmacies: a questionnaire-based survey in Switzerland","author_short":["Indermitte, J.","Erba, L.","Beutler, M.","Bruppacher, R.","Haefeli, W. E","Hersberger, K. E"],"year":2007,"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero/emmanuel.chazard","bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Management of potential drug interactions in community pharmacies: a questionnaire-based survey in Switzerland","volume":"63","issn":"0031-6970","shorttitle":"Management of potential drug interactions in community pharmacies","doi":"10.1007/s00228-006-0237-5","abstract":"OBJECTIVE: To analyze the current drug-interaction management in Swiss community pharmacies, with a particular focus on electronic systems, and to compare the results with those expressed by German general practitioners in a recent survey. METHODS: Data were collected with a postal questionnaire which was randomly sent to 500 out of 833 community pharmacies in the German part of Switzerland. RESULTS: The response rate was 57.4%, and only 24.7% pharmacists reported that they were confronted less than daily with potential drug interactions. Use of computer software to identify potential drug interactions was widespread in community pharmacies (90.2%), and the software was the primary source of information (81.2 +/- 29.6%). The quality of the interaction software was judged sensitive (identifying all dangerous interactions) by 80.5 +/- 21.5%, but specific (identifying only relevant interactions) by only 38.3 +/- 32%. Pharmacists declared a low override rate (14%) of drug interaction alerts, although unjustified alerts were reported by 60.6 +/- 33.1%. In contrast to general practitioners, pharmacists opted less often for information on the mechanism of the interaction, and more frequently for details for dose adjustment. Both groups complained about deficient information on non-interacting alternatives. CONCLUSION: The information needs of community pharmacists differed considerably from general practitioners, and pharmacists were overwhelmed by inappropriate alerts because of a lack of specificity of their drug-interaction systems. Substantial improvement of drug-interaction software systems is thus required at least in two important aspects, the suppression of inappropriate alerts and the tailoring to the needs of the user.","language":"eng","number":"3","journal":"European journal of clinical pharmacology","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Indermitte"],"firstnames":["Jörg"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Erba"],"firstnames":["Laura"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Beutler"],"firstnames":["Marianne"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Bruppacher"],"firstnames":["Rudolf"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Haefeli"],"firstnames":["Walter","E"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Hersberger"],"firstnames":["Kurt","E"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"March","year":"2007","pmid":"17216436","keywords":"Adult, Communication, Drug Information Services, Drug Interactions, Female, Humans, Male, Medication Errors, Middle Aged, Perception, Pharmacies, Questionnaires, Software","pages":"297–305","bibtex":"@article{indermitte_management_2007,\n\ttitle = {Management of potential drug interactions in community pharmacies: a questionnaire-based survey in {Switzerland}},\n\tvolume = {63},\n\tissn = {0031-6970},\n\tshorttitle = {Management of potential drug interactions in community pharmacies},\n\tdoi = {10.1007/s00228-006-0237-5},\n\tabstract = {OBJECTIVE: To analyze the current drug-interaction management in Swiss community pharmacies, with a particular focus on electronic systems, and to compare the results with those expressed by German general practitioners in a recent survey.\nMETHODS: Data were collected with a postal questionnaire which was randomly sent to 500 out of 833 community pharmacies in the German part of Switzerland.\nRESULTS: The response rate was 57.4\\%, and only 24.7\\% pharmacists reported that they were confronted less than daily with potential drug interactions. Use of computer software to identify potential drug interactions was widespread in community pharmacies (90.2\\%), and the software was the primary source of information (81.2 +/- 29.6\\%). The quality of the interaction software was judged sensitive (identifying all dangerous interactions) by 80.5 +/- 21.5\\%, but specific (identifying only relevant interactions) by only 38.3 +/- 32\\%. Pharmacists declared a low override rate (14\\%) of drug interaction alerts, although unjustified alerts were reported by 60.6 +/- 33.1\\%. In contrast to general practitioners, pharmacists opted less often for information on the mechanism of the interaction, and more frequently for details for dose adjustment. Both groups complained about deficient information on non-interacting alternatives.\nCONCLUSION: The information needs of community pharmacists differed considerably from general practitioners, and pharmacists were overwhelmed by inappropriate alerts because of a lack of specificity of their drug-interaction systems. Substantial improvement of drug-interaction software systems is thus required at least in two important aspects, the suppression of inappropriate alerts and the tailoring to the needs of the user.},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tnumber = {3},\n\tjournal = {European journal of clinical pharmacology},\n\tauthor = {Indermitte, Jörg and Erba, Laura and Beutler, Marianne and Bruppacher, Rudolf and Haefeli, Walter E and Hersberger, Kurt E},\n\tmonth = mar,\n\tyear = {2007},\n\tpmid = {17216436},\n\tkeywords = {Adult, Communication, Drug Information Services, Drug Interactions, Female, Humans, Male, Medication Errors, Middle Aged, Perception, Pharmacies, Questionnaires, Software},\n\tpages = {297--305}\n}\n\n","author_short":["Indermitte, J.","Erba, L.","Beutler, M.","Bruppacher, R.","Haefeli, W. E","Hersberger, K. E"],"key":"indermitte_management_2007","id":"indermitte_management_2007","bibbaseid":"indermitte-erba-beutler-bruppacher-haefeli-hersberger-managementofpotentialdruginteractionsincommunitypharmaciesaquestionnairebasedsurveyinswitzerland-2007","role":"author","urls":{},"keyword":["Adult","Communication","Drug Information Services","Drug Interactions","Female","Humans","Male","Medication Errors","Middle Aged","Perception","Pharmacies","Questionnaires","Software"],"downloads":0},"search_terms":["management","potential","drug","interactions","community","pharmacies","questionnaire","based","survey","switzerland","indermitte","erba","beutler","bruppacher","haefeli","hersberger"],"keywords":["adult","communication","drug information services","drug interactions","female","humans","male","medication errors","middle aged","perception","pharmacies","questionnaires","software"],"authorIDs":[],"dataSources":["XiRGowmyYWQpwjiC9"]}