@article{ishizakaReviewMainDevelopments2011,
  title = {Review of the Main Developments in the Analytic Hierarchy Process},
  author = {Ishizaka, Alessio and Labib, Ashraf},
  date = {2011-05},
  journaltitle = {Expert Systems with Applications},
  issn = {0957-4174},
  doi = {10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.143},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.143},
  abstract = {[Abstract]

In this paper the authors review the developments of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) since its inception. The focus of this paper is a neutral review on the methodological developments rather than reporting its applications that have appeared since its introduction. In particular, we discuss problem modelling, pair-wise comparisons, judgement scales, derivation methods, consistency indices, incomplete matrix, synthesis of the weights, sensitivity analysis and group decisions. All have been important areas of research in AHP.

[Highlights]

[::] Methodological developments of the analytic hierarchy process are reviewed. 

[::] We discuss problem modelling, pair-wise comparisons, judgement scales. 

[::] We examine derivation methods, consistency indices, incomplete matrix. 

[::] We explore synthesis of the weights, sensitivity analysis and group decisions.},
  keywords = {*imported-from-citeulike-INRMM,~INRMM-MiD:c-9288266,~to-add-doi-URL,ambiguity,communicating-uncertainty,comparison,decision-making,multi-criteria-decision-analysis,review,uncertainty,weighting}
}

{"_id":"REaRjewfeBiAA8Tvi","bibbaseid":"ishizaka-labib-reviewofthemaindevelopmentsintheanalytichierarchyprocess","authorIDs":[],"author_short":["Ishizaka, A.","Labib, A."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Review of the Main Developments in the Analytic Hierarchy Process","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Ishizaka"],"firstnames":["Alessio"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Labib"],"firstnames":["Ashraf"],"suffixes":[]}],"date":"2011-05","journaltitle":"Expert Systems with Applications","issn":"0957-4174","doi":"10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.143","url":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.143","abstract":"[Abstract] In this paper the authors review the developments of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) since its inception. The focus of this paper is a neutral review on the methodological developments rather than reporting its applications that have appeared since its introduction. In particular, we discuss problem modelling, pair-wise comparisons, judgement scales, derivation methods, consistency indices, incomplete matrix, synthesis of the weights, sensitivity analysis and group decisions. All have been important areas of research in AHP. [Highlights] [::] Methodological developments of the analytic hierarchy process are reviewed. [::] We discuss problem modelling, pair-wise comparisons, judgement scales. [::] We examine derivation methods, consistency indices, incomplete matrix. [::] We explore synthesis of the weights, sensitivity analysis and group decisions.","keywords":"*imported-from-citeulike-INRMM,~INRMM-MiD:c-9288266,~to-add-doi-URL,ambiguity,communicating-uncertainty,comparison,decision-making,multi-criteria-decision-analysis,review,uncertainty,weighting","bibtex":"@article{ishizakaReviewMainDevelopments2011,\n title = {Review of the Main Developments in the Analytic Hierarchy Process},\n author = {Ishizaka, Alessio and Labib, Ashraf},\n date = {2011-05},\n journaltitle = {Expert Systems with Applications},\n issn = {0957-4174},\n doi = {10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.143},\n url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.143},\n abstract = {[Abstract]\n\nIn this paper the authors review the developments of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) since its inception. The focus of this paper is a neutral review on the methodological developments rather than reporting its applications that have appeared since its introduction. In particular, we discuss problem modelling, pair-wise comparisons, judgement scales, derivation methods, consistency indices, incomplete matrix, synthesis of the weights, sensitivity analysis and group decisions. All have been important areas of research in AHP.\n\n[Highlights]\n\n[::] Methodological developments of the analytic hierarchy process are reviewed. \n\n[::] We discuss problem modelling, pair-wise comparisons, judgement scales. \n\n[::] We examine derivation methods, consistency indices, incomplete matrix. \n\n[::] We explore synthesis of the weights, sensitivity analysis and group decisions.},\n keywords = {*imported-from-citeulike-INRMM,~INRMM-MiD:c-9288266,~to-add-doi-URL,ambiguity,communicating-uncertainty,comparison,decision-making,multi-criteria-decision-analysis,review,uncertainty,weighting}\n}\n\n","author_short":["Ishizaka, A.","Labib, A."],"key":"ishizakaReviewMainDevelopments2011","id":"ishizakaReviewMainDevelopments2011","bibbaseid":"ishizaka-labib-reviewofthemaindevelopmentsintheanalytichierarchyprocess","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.143"},"keyword":["*imported-from-citeulike-INRMM","~INRMM-MiD:c-9288266","~to-add-doi-URL","ambiguity","communicating-uncertainty","comparison","decision-making","multi-criteria-decision-analysis","review","uncertainty","weighting"],"downloads":0},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://tmpfiles.org/dl/58794/INRMM.bib","creationDate":"2020-07-02T22:41:10.096Z","downloads":0,"keywords":["*imported-from-citeulike-inrmm","~inrmm-mid:c-9288266","~to-add-doi-url","ambiguity","communicating-uncertainty","comparison","decision-making","multi-criteria-decision-analysis","review","uncertainty","weighting"],"search_terms":["review","main","developments","analytic","hierarchy","process","ishizaka","labib"],"title":"Review of the Main Developments in the Analytic Hierarchy Process","year":null,"dataSources":["DXuKbcZTirdigFKPF"]}