How you know you are not a brain in a vat. Jackson, A. Philosophical Studies, 172(10):2799–2822, 2015. Paper doi abstract bibtex A sensible epistemologist may not see how she could know that she is not a brain in a vat (BIV); but she doesn't panic. She sticks with her empirical beliefs, and as that requires, believes that she is not a BIV. (She does not infer entially base her belief that she is not a BIV on her empirical knowledge—she rejects that 'Moorean' response to skepticism.) Drawing on the psychological lit erature on metacognition, I describe a mechanism that's plausibly responsible for a sensible epistemologist coming to believe she is not a BIV. I propose she thereby knows that she is not a BIV. The particular belief-forming mechanism employed explains why she overlooks this account of how she knows she is not a BIV, making it seem that there is no way for her to know it. I argue this proposal satisfactorily resolves the skeptical puzzle.
@article{Jackson2015,
abstract = {A sensible epistemologist may not see how she could know that she is not a brain in a vat (BIV); but she doesn't panic. She sticks with her empirical beliefs, and as that requires, believes that she is not a BIV. (She does not infer entially base her belief that she is not a BIV on her empirical knowledge—she rejects that 'Moorean' response to skepticism.) Drawing on the psychological lit erature on metacognition, I describe a mechanism that's plausibly responsible for a sensible epistemologist coming to believe she is not a BIV. I propose she thereby knows that she is not a BIV. The particular belief-forming mechanism employed explains why she overlooks this account of how she knows she is not a BIV, making it seem that there is no way for her to know it. I argue this proposal satisfactorily resolves the skeptical puzzle.},
author = {Jackson, Alexander},
doi = {10.1007/s11098-015-0445-x},
file = {:Users/michaelk/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Jackson - 2015 - How you know you are not a brain in a vat.pdf:pdf},
issn = {0031-8116},
journal = {Philosophical Studies},
number = {10},
pages = {2799--2822},
title = {{How you know you are not a brain in a vat}},
url = {http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11098-015-0445-x},
volume = {172},
year = {2015}
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"7c9AuwvdNmoCr2a6a","bibbaseid":"jackson-howyouknowyouarenotabraininavat-2015","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2019-04-01T06:57:21.812Z","title":"How you know you are not a brain in a vat","author_short":["Jackson, A."],"year":2015,"bibtype":"article","biburl":"http://phil-mem.org/phil-mem.bib/","bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","abstract":"A sensible epistemologist may not see how she could know that she is not a brain in a vat (BIV); but she doesn't panic. She sticks with her empirical beliefs, and as that requires, believes that she is not a BIV. (She does not infer entially base her belief that she is not a BIV on her empirical knowledge—she rejects that 'Moorean' response to skepticism.) Drawing on the psychological lit erature on metacognition, I describe a mechanism that's plausibly responsible for a sensible epistemologist coming to believe she is not a BIV. I propose she thereby knows that she is not a BIV. The particular belief-forming mechanism employed explains why she overlooks this account of how she knows she is not a BIV, making it seem that there is no way for her to know it. I argue this proposal satisfactorily resolves the skeptical puzzle.","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Jackson"],"firstnames":["Alexander"],"suffixes":[]}],"doi":"10.1007/s11098-015-0445-x","file":":Users/michaelk/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Jackson - 2015 - How you know you are not a brain in a vat.pdf:pdf","issn":"0031-8116","journal":"Philosophical Studies","number":"10","pages":"2799–2822","title":"How you know you are not a brain in a vat","url":"http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11098-015-0445-x","volume":"172","year":"2015","bibtex":"@article{Jackson2015,\nabstract = {A sensible epistemologist may not see how she could know that she is not a brain in a vat (BIV); but she doesn't panic. She sticks with her empirical beliefs, and as that requires, believes that she is not a BIV. (She does not infer entially base her belief that she is not a BIV on her empirical knowledge—she rejects that 'Moorean' response to skepticism.) Drawing on the psychological lit erature on metacognition, I describe a mechanism that's plausibly responsible for a sensible epistemologist coming to believe she is not a BIV. I propose she thereby knows that she is not a BIV. The particular belief-forming mechanism employed explains why she overlooks this account of how she knows she is not a BIV, making it seem that there is no way for her to know it. I argue this proposal satisfactorily resolves the skeptical puzzle.},\nauthor = {Jackson, Alexander},\ndoi = {10.1007/s11098-015-0445-x},\nfile = {:Users/michaelk/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Jackson - 2015 - How you know you are not a brain in a vat.pdf:pdf},\nissn = {0031-8116},\njournal = {Philosophical Studies},\nnumber = {10},\npages = {2799--2822},\ntitle = {{How you know you are not a brain in a vat}},\nurl = {http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11098-015-0445-x},\nvolume = {172},\nyear = {2015}\n}\n","author_short":["Jackson, A."],"key":"Jackson2015","id":"Jackson2015","bibbaseid":"jackson-howyouknowyouarenotabraininavat-2015","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11098-015-0445-x"},"downloads":0},"search_terms":["know","brain","vat","jackson"],"keywords":[],"authorIDs":[],"dataSources":["xpm4HPGis5kQeHY7z"]}