@article{Jagodzinski1988Is,
  abstract = {"In their stimulating article, Saris and Putte (this volume) challenge two of our major findings (Jagodzinski and Kühnel, 1987; Jagodzinski et al., 1987). First, they deny our conceptualization of measurement error and dispute the existence of a Socratic effect. Second, they reject our attempt to measure a general underlying attitude that is stable across time and has an impact on a larger set of items. Rather, they assume that each of the four guest worker items is related to a specific option that is fairly unstable between the first and the second interview. In this comment, we discuss these topics. Since, in our view, no goodness of fit measures or other statistical criteria can discriminate between Sarin and Putte's models and our models, we must confine ourselves to some theoretical and methodological considerations." Die Autoren kritisieren an den Modellen von Saris und Putte insbesondere, dass es keine substantielle theoretische Rechtfertigung für das Konstanthalten der Fehlervarianzen über mehrere Messzeitpunkte gebe und dass die für Theoriebildung wichtige Annahme von allgemeinen Einstellungen aufgegeben wird. Die Analysen, die diskutiert werden, basieren auf Daten der ALLBUS Test-Retest-Studie 1984},
  added-at = {2016-02-01T15:52:09.000+0100},
  author = {Jagodzinski, Wolfgang and Kühnel Steffen und Schmidt, Peter},
  biburl = {http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2c34004336a2d637bf384fac09c0e3294/gesis_surveydoc},
  interhash = {0085eb8baa1e2d6e4310f3c99b586e58},
  intrahash = {c34004336a2d637bf384fac09c0e3294},
  journal = {Sociological Methods & Research},
  keywords = {1988 ALLBUS input2014 checked FDZ_ALLBUS article},
  note = {(ALLBUS)},
  pages = {158-164},
  privnote = {ALLBUS_ID=377},
  study = {ALLBUS 1984/ ALLBUS Test-Retest-Studie 1984/},
  timestamp = {2016-02-01T15:52:09.000+0100},
  title = {Is the True Score Model or the Factor Model More Appropriate? Response to Saris and Putte},
  volume = 17,
  year = 1988
}

{"_id":"WefAYKBsk5KCBkiED","bibbaseid":"jagodzinski-khnelsteffenundschmidt-isthetruescoremodelorthefactormodelmoreappropriateresponsetosarisandputte-1988","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2016-02-09T05:23:23.173Z","title":"Is the True Score Model or the Factor Model More Appropriate? Response to Saris and Putte","author_short":["Jagodzinski, W.","Kühnel Steffen und Schmidt, P."],"year":1988,"bibtype":"article","biburl":"http://www.bibsonomy.org/bib/author/Peter Bryner?items=1000","bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","abstract":"\"In their stimulating article, Saris and Putte (this volume) challenge two of our major findings (Jagodzinski and Kühnel, 1987; Jagodzinski et al., 1987). First, they deny our conceptualization of measurement error and dispute the existence of a Socratic effect. Second, they reject our attempt to measure a general underlying attitude that is stable across time and has an impact on a larger set of items. Rather, they assume that each of the four guest worker items is related to a specific option that is fairly unstable between the first and the second interview. In this comment, we discuss these topics. Since, in our view, no goodness of fit measures or other statistical criteria can discriminate between Sarin and Putte's models and our models, we must confine ourselves to some theoretical and methodological considerations.\" Die Autoren kritisieren an den Modellen von Saris und Putte insbesondere, dass es keine substantielle theoretische Rechtfertigung für das Konstanthalten der Fehlervarianzen über mehrere Messzeitpunkte gebe und dass die für Theoriebildung wichtige Annahme von allgemeinen Einstellungen aufgegeben wird. Die Analysen, die diskutiert werden, basieren auf Daten der ALLBUS Test-Retest-Studie 1984","added-at":"2016-02-01T15:52:09.000+0100","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Jagodzinski"],"firstnames":["Wolfgang"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":["Kühnel","Steffen","und"],"lastnames":["Schmidt"],"firstnames":["Peter"],"suffixes":[]}],"biburl":"http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2c34004336a2d637bf384fac09c0e3294/gesis_surveydoc","interhash":"0085eb8baa1e2d6e4310f3c99b586e58","intrahash":"c34004336a2d637bf384fac09c0e3294","journal":"Sociological Methods & Research","keywords":"1988 ALLBUS input2014 checked FDZ_ALLBUS article","note":"(ALLBUS)","pages":"158-164","privnote":"ALLBUS_ID=377","study":"ALLBUS 1984/ ALLBUS Test-Retest-Studie 1984/","timestamp":"2016-02-01T15:52:09.000+0100","title":"Is the True Score Model or the Factor Model More Appropriate? Response to Saris and Putte","volume":"17","year":"1988","bibtex":"@article{Jagodzinski1988Is,\n abstract = {\"In their stimulating article, Saris and Putte (this volume) challenge two of our major findings (Jagodzinski and Kühnel, 1987; Jagodzinski et al., 1987). First, they deny our conceptualization of measurement error and dispute the existence of a Socratic effect. Second, they reject our attempt to measure a general underlying attitude that is stable across time and has an impact on a larger set of items. Rather, they assume that each of the four guest worker items is related to a specific option that is fairly unstable between the first and the second interview. In this comment, we discuss these topics. Since, in our view, no goodness of fit measures or other statistical criteria can discriminate between Sarin and Putte's models and our models, we must confine ourselves to some theoretical and methodological considerations.\" Die Autoren kritisieren an den Modellen von Saris und Putte insbesondere, dass es keine substantielle theoretische Rechtfertigung für das Konstanthalten der Fehlervarianzen über mehrere Messzeitpunkte gebe und dass die für Theoriebildung wichtige Annahme von allgemeinen Einstellungen aufgegeben wird. Die Analysen, die diskutiert werden, basieren auf Daten der ALLBUS Test-Retest-Studie 1984},\n added-at = {2016-02-01T15:52:09.000+0100},\n author = {Jagodzinski, Wolfgang and Kühnel Steffen und Schmidt, Peter},\n biburl = {http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2c34004336a2d637bf384fac09c0e3294/gesis_surveydoc},\n interhash = {0085eb8baa1e2d6e4310f3c99b586e58},\n intrahash = {c34004336a2d637bf384fac09c0e3294},\n journal = {Sociological Methods & Research},\n keywords = {1988 ALLBUS input2014 checked FDZ_ALLBUS article},\n note = {(ALLBUS)},\n pages = {158-164},\n privnote = {ALLBUS_ID=377},\n study = {ALLBUS 1984/ ALLBUS Test-Retest-Studie 1984/},\n timestamp = {2016-02-01T15:52:09.000+0100},\n title = {Is the True Score Model or the Factor Model More Appropriate? Response to Saris and Putte},\n volume = 17,\n year = 1988\n}\n\n","author_short":["Jagodzinski, W.","Kühnel Steffen und Schmidt, P."],"key":"Jagodzinski1988Is","id":"Jagodzinski1988Is","bibbaseid":"jagodzinski-khnelsteffenundschmidt-isthetruescoremodelorthefactormodelmoreappropriateresponsetosarisandputte-1988","role":"author","urls":{},"keyword":["1988 ALLBUS input2014 checked FDZ_ALLBUS article"],"downloads":0},"search_terms":["true","score","model","factor","model","more","appropriate","response","saris","putte","jagodzinski","kühnel steffen und schmidt"],"keywords":["1988 allbus input2014 checked fdz_allbus article"],"authorIDs":[],"dataSources":["R7Sibxa4rHybrdx8J"]}