Effects of the Core Functions of Government on the Diversity of Executive Agendas. Jennings, W., Bevan, S., Timmermans, A., Breeman, G., Brouard, S., Chaqués-Bonafont, L., Green-Pedersen, C., John, P., Mortensen, P. B., & Palau, A. M. Comparative Political Studies, 44(8):1001--1030, August, 2011.
Effects of the Core Functions of Government on the Diversity of Executive Agendas [link]Paper  doi  abstract   bibtex   
The distribution of attention across issues is of fundamental importance to the political agenda and outputs of government. This article presents an issue-based theory of the diversity of governing agendas where the core functions of government—defense, international affairs, the economy, government operations, and the rule of law—are prioritized ahead of all other issues. It undertakes comparative analysis of issue diversity of the executive agenda of several European countries and the United States over the postwar period. The results offer strong evidence of the limiting effect of core issues—the economy, government operations, defense, and international affairs—on agenda diversity. This suggests not only that some issues receive more attention than others but also that some issues are attended to only at times when the agenda is more diverse. When core functions of government are high on the agenda, executives pursue a less diverse agenda—focusing the majority of their attention on fewer issues. Some issues are more equal than others in executive agenda setting.
@article{jennings_effects_2011,
	title = {Effects of the {Core} {Functions} of {Government} on the {Diversity} of {Executive} {Agendas}},
	volume = {44},
	issn = {0010-4140, 1552-3829},
	url = {http://cps.sagepub.com/content/44/8/1001},
	doi = {10.1177/0010414011405165},
	abstract = {The distribution of attention across issues is of fundamental importance to the political agenda and outputs of government. This article presents an issue-based theory of the diversity of governing agendas where the core functions of government—defense, international affairs, the economy, government operations, and the rule of law—are prioritized ahead of all other issues. It undertakes comparative analysis of issue diversity of the executive agenda of several European countries and the United States over the postwar period. The results offer strong evidence of the limiting effect of core issues—the economy, government operations, defense, and international affairs—on agenda diversity. This suggests not only that some issues receive more attention than others but also that some issues are attended to only at times when the agenda is more diverse. When core functions of government are high on the agenda, executives pursue a less diverse agenda—focusing the majority of their attention on fewer issues. Some issues are more equal than others in executive agenda setting.},
	language = {en},
	number = {8},
	urldate = {2015-03-25},
	journal = {Comparative Political Studies},
	author = {Jennings, Will and Bevan, Shaun and Timmermans, Arco and Breeman, Gerard and Brouard, Sylvain and Chaqués-Bonafont, Laura and Green-Pedersen, Christoffer and John, Peter and Mortensen, Peter B. and Palau, Anna M.},
	month = aug,
	year = {2011},
	keywords = {agenda setting, comparative public policy, executive speeches, Policy dynamics},
	pages = {1001--1030},
	file = {Snapshot:files/51127/1001.html:text/html}
}

Downloads: 0