The quantitative single-neuron modeling competition. Jolivet, R., Schürmann, F., Berger, T. K, Naud, R., Gerstner, W., & Roth, A. Biol Cybern, 99(4-5):417--426, Nov, 2008.
abstract   bibtex   
As large-scale, detailed network modeling projects are flourishing in the field of computational neuroscience, it is more and more important to design single neuron models that not only capture qualitative features of real neurons but are quantitatively accurate in silico representations of those. Recent years have seen substantial effort being put in the development of algorithms for the systematic evaluation and optimization of neuron models with respect to electrophysiological data. It is however difficult to compare these methods because of the lack of appropriate benchmark tests. Here, we describe one such effort of providing the community with a standardized set of tests to quantify the performances of single neuron models. Our effort takes the form of a yearly challenge similar to the ones which have been present in the machine learning community for some time. This paper gives an account of the first two challenges which took place in 2007 and 2008 and discusses future directions. The results of the competition suggest that best performance on data obtained from single or double electrode current or conductance injection is achieved by models that combine features of standard leaky integrate-and-fire models with a second variable reflecting adaptation, refractoriness, or a dynamic threshold.
@article{ Jolivet_etal08b,
  author = {Renaud Jolivet and Felix Schürmann and Thomas K Berger and Richard
	Naud and Wulfram Gerstner and Arnd Roth},
  title = {The quantitative single-neuron modeling competition.},
  journal = {Biol Cybern},
  year = {2008},
  volume = {99},
  pages = {417--426},
  number = {4-5},
  month = {Nov},
  abstract = {As large-scale, detailed network modeling projects are flourishing
	in the field of computational neuroscience, it is more and more important
	to design single neuron models that not only capture qualitative
	features of real neurons but are quantitatively accurate in silico
	representations of those. Recent years have seen substantial effort
	being put in the development of algorithms for the systematic evaluation
	and optimization of neuron models with respect to electrophysiological
	data. It is however difficult to compare these methods because of
	the lack of appropriate benchmark tests. Here, we describe one such
	effort of providing the community with a standardized set of tests
	to quantify the performances of single neuron models. Our effort
	takes the form of a yearly challenge similar to the ones which have
	been present in the machine learning community for some time. This
	paper gives an account of the first two challenges which took place
	in 2007 and 2008 and discusses future directions. The results of
	the competition suggest that best performance on data obtained from
	single or double electrode current or conductance injection is achieved
	by models that combine features of standard leaky integrate-and-fire
	models with a second variable reflecting adaptation, refractoriness,
	or a dynamic threshold.},
  keywords = {Algorithms; Models, Neurological; Neurology, trends; Neurons, physiology}
}

Downloads: 0