Knowing from Not Knowing. Kallestrup, J. In Uncovering Facts and Values: Studies in Contemporary Epistemology and Political Philosophy ., of Poznań Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, pages 41–55. Brill \textbar Rodopi, Leiden, Kuźniar, Adrian et Odrowąż-Sypniewska, Joanna edition, 2016. ![Knowing from Not Knowing. [link]](https://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/link.svg "link")
Paper abstract bibtex Arguments from ignorance are typically fallacious: one shouldn't infer that p is true merely from the fact that p isn,'t known to be false. The reason one cannot invariably come to know that p on the basis of lack of knowledge that not-p is that p may well be false even though one hasn't been in a position to know that not-p. The qualifiers 'typically, and 'invariably, are key here. In cases where one would have known that not-p had p been false, reasoning from ignorance seems perfectly kosher, indeed where one knows that counterfactual independently, one is positioned to gain knowledge. Goldberg (2010a; 2010b) has developed a set of conditions sufficient for such epistemic coverage to obtain in the domain of social epistemology. This paper elaborates, extends and critically discusses Goldberg's pioneering framework.
@incollection{kallestrup_knowing_2016,
address = {Leiden},
edition = {Kuźniar, Adrian et Odrowąż-Sypniewska, Joanna},
series = {Poznań {Studies} in the {Philosophy} of the {Sciences} and the {Humanities}},
title = {Knowing from {Not} {Knowing}.},
isbn = {978-90-04-31265-4},
url = {DOI 10.1163/9789004312654004},
abstract = {Arguments from ignorance are typically fallacious: one shouldn't infer that p is true merely from the fact that p isn,'t known to be false. The reason one cannot invariably come to know that p on the basis of lack of knowledge that not-p is that p may well be false even though one hasn't been in a position to know that not-p. The qualifiers 'typically, and 'invariably, are key here. In cases where one would have known that not-p had p been false, reasoning from ignorance seems perfectly kosher, indeed where one knows that counterfactual independently, one is positioned to gain knowledge. Goldberg (2010a; 2010b) has developed a set of conditions sufficient for such epistemic coverage to obtain in the domain of social epistemology. This paper elaborates, extends and critically discusses Goldberg's pioneering framework.},
language = {en},
booktitle = {Uncovering {Facts} and {Values}: {Studies} in {Contemporary} {Epistemology} and {Political} {Philosophy} .},
publisher = {Brill {\textbar} Rodopi},
author = {Kallestrup, Jesper},
year = {2016},
pages = {41--55},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"5x3pDSQ2SqT44sMDq","bibbaseid":"kallestrup-knowingfromnotknowing-2016","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2018-08-23T14:08:28.941Z","title":"Knowing from Not Knowing.","author_short":["Kallestrup, J."],"year":2016,"bibtype":"incollection","biburl":"http://bibbase.org/zotero-group/science_et_ignorance/1340424","bibdata":{"bibtype":"incollection","type":"incollection","address":"Leiden","edition":"Kuźniar, Adrian et Odrowąż-Sypniewska, Joanna","series":"Poznań Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities","title":"Knowing from Not Knowing.","isbn":"978-90-04-31265-4","url":"DOI 10.1163/9789004312654004","abstract":"Arguments from ignorance are typically fallacious: one shouldn't infer that p is true merely from the fact that p isn,'t known to be false. The reason one cannot invariably come to know that p on the basis of lack of knowledge that not-p is that p may well be false even though one hasn't been in a position to know that not-p. The qualifiers 'typically, and 'invariably, are key here. In cases where one would have known that not-p had p been false, reasoning from ignorance seems perfectly kosher, indeed where one knows that counterfactual independently, one is positioned to gain knowledge. Goldberg (2010a; 2010b) has developed a set of conditions sufficient for such epistemic coverage to obtain in the domain of social epistemology. This paper elaborates, extends and critically discusses Goldberg's pioneering framework.","language":"en","booktitle":"Uncovering Facts and Values: Studies in Contemporary Epistemology and Political Philosophy .","publisher":"Brill \\textbar Rodopi","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Kallestrup"],"firstnames":["Jesper"],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"2016","pages":"41–55","bibtex":"@incollection{kallestrup_knowing_2016,\n\taddress = {Leiden},\n\tedition = {Kuźniar, Adrian et Odrowąż-Sypniewska, Joanna},\n\tseries = {Poznań {Studies} in the {Philosophy} of the {Sciences} and the {Humanities}},\n\ttitle = {Knowing from {Not} {Knowing}.},\n\tisbn = {978-90-04-31265-4},\n\turl = {DOI 10.1163/9789004312654004},\n\tabstract = {Arguments from ignorance are typically fallacious: one shouldn't infer that p is true merely from the fact that p isn,'t known to be false. The reason one cannot invariably come to know that p on the basis of lack of knowledge that not-p is that p may well be false even though one hasn't been in a position to know that not-p. The qualifiers 'typically, and 'invariably, are key here. In cases where one would have known that not-p had p been false, reasoning from ignorance seems perfectly kosher, indeed where one knows that counterfactual independently, one is positioned to gain knowledge. Goldberg (2010a; 2010b) has developed a set of conditions sufficient for such epistemic coverage to obtain in the domain of social epistemology. This paper elaborates, extends and critically discusses Goldberg's pioneering framework.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tbooktitle = {Uncovering {Facts} and {Values}: {Studies} in {Contemporary} {Epistemology} and {Political} {Philosophy} .},\n\tpublisher = {Brill {\\textbar} Rodopi},\n\tauthor = {Kallestrup, Jesper},\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tpages = {41--55},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Kallestrup, J."],"key":"kallestrup_knowing_2016","id":"kallestrup_knowing_2016","bibbaseid":"kallestrup-knowingfromnotknowing-2016","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://bibbase.org/zotero-group/science_et_ignorance/DOI%2010.1163/9789004312654004"},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"downloads":0},"search_terms":["knowing","knowing","kallestrup"],"keywords":[],"authorIDs":[],"dataSources":["k2PBKbKCoYpSGCt3h","zX4acseCDM6D58AW7","5XkfmA9xajmKjWGio"]}