The Dynasty and the Imperial Idea. Kann, R. A. Austrian History Yearbook, 3(1):11–31, January, 1967. ![The Dynasty and the Imperial Idea [link]](https://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/link.svg "link")
Paper doi abstract bibtex It would be much easier to state what the relationship between the concepts of the “dynasty” and the “imperial idea” does not mean than to explain what it is supposed to mean. Before we can make any serious efforts to do so, we must, first of all, come to a clear understanding of the exact meaning of some of the terms involved. In English-speaking areas the word “empire” is generally understood to mean “an extended territory, usually comprised of a group of nations, states or peoples under the control or domination of a single sovereign power.” Frequently the determining factors are the assumption of a master-subject relationship between “a dominating conquering people and the conquered people,” either by way of a confederacy, in which “one strong member dominates its confederates,” or by even more direct subordination. Furthermore, the notion of an empire is generally associated with an area of considerable size and frequently “with the supreme or absolute power especially of an emperor. 1
@article{kann_dynasty_1967,
title = {The {Dynasty} and the {Imperial} {Idea}},
volume = {3},
issn = {0067-2378, 1558-5255},
url = {https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0067237800004069/type/journal_article},
doi = {10.1017/S0067237800004069},
abstract = {It would be much easier to state what the relationship between the concepts of the “dynasty” and the “imperial idea” does not mean than to explain what it is supposed to mean. Before we can make any serious efforts to do so, we must, first of all, come to a clear understanding of the exact meaning of some of the terms involved. In English-speaking areas the word “empire” is generally understood to mean “an extended territory, usually comprised of a group of nations, states or peoples under the control or domination of a single sovereign power.” Frequently the determining factors are the assumption of a master-subject relationship between “a dominating conquering people and the conquered people,” either by way of a confederacy, in which “one strong member dominates its confederates,” or by even more direct subordination. Furthermore, the notion of an empire is generally associated with an area of considerable size and frequently “with the supreme or absolute power especially of an emperor.
1},
language = {en},
number = {1},
urldate = {2022-04-26},
journal = {Austrian History Yearbook},
author = {Kann, Robert A.},
month = jan,
year = {1967},
pages = {11--31},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"jveEEvjc63ps2XxAs","bibbaseid":"kann-thedynastyandtheimperialidea-1967","author_short":["Kann, R. A."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"The Dynasty and the Imperial Idea","volume":"3","issn":"0067-2378, 1558-5255","url":"https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0067237800004069/type/journal_article","doi":"10.1017/S0067237800004069","abstract":"It would be much easier to state what the relationship between the concepts of the “dynasty” and the “imperial idea” does not mean than to explain what it is supposed to mean. Before we can make any serious efforts to do so, we must, first of all, come to a clear understanding of the exact meaning of some of the terms involved. In English-speaking areas the word “empire” is generally understood to mean “an extended territory, usually comprised of a group of nations, states or peoples under the control or domination of a single sovereign power.” Frequently the determining factors are the assumption of a master-subject relationship between “a dominating conquering people and the conquered people,” either by way of a confederacy, in which “one strong member dominates its confederates,” or by even more direct subordination. Furthermore, the notion of an empire is generally associated with an area of considerable size and frequently “with the supreme or absolute power especially of an emperor. 1","language":"en","number":"1","urldate":"2022-04-26","journal":"Austrian History Yearbook","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Kann"],"firstnames":["Robert","A."],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"January","year":"1967","pages":"11–31","bibtex":"@article{kann_dynasty_1967,\n\ttitle = {The {Dynasty} and the {Imperial} {Idea}},\n\tvolume = {3},\n\tissn = {0067-2378, 1558-5255},\n\turl = {https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0067237800004069/type/journal_article},\n\tdoi = {10.1017/S0067237800004069},\n\tabstract = {It would be much easier to state what the relationship between the concepts of the “dynasty” and the “imperial idea” does not mean than to explain what it is supposed to mean. Before we can make any serious efforts to do so, we must, first of all, come to a clear understanding of the exact meaning of some of the terms involved. In English-speaking areas the word “empire” is generally understood to mean “an extended territory, usually comprised of a group of nations, states or peoples under the control or domination of a single sovereign power.” Frequently the determining factors are the assumption of a master-subject relationship between “a dominating conquering people and the conquered people,” either by way of a confederacy, in which “one strong member dominates its confederates,” or by even more direct subordination. Furthermore, the notion of an empire is generally associated with an area of considerable size and frequently “with the supreme or absolute power especially of an emperor.\n 1},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2022-04-26},\n\tjournal = {Austrian History Yearbook},\n\tauthor = {Kann, Robert A.},\n\tmonth = jan,\n\tyear = {1967},\n\tpages = {11--31},\n}\n\n\n\n","author_short":["Kann, R. A."],"key":"kann_dynasty_1967","id":"kann_dynasty_1967","bibbaseid":"kann-thedynastyandtheimperialidea-1967","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0067237800004069/type/journal_article"},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"html":""},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero/teashek","dataSources":["THyNMAXR3JTyp6hr2"],"keywords":[],"search_terms":["dynasty","imperial","idea","kann"],"title":"The Dynasty and the Imperial Idea","year":1967}