Development of seismic vulnerability curves for masonry buildings using the applied element method. Karbassi, A. & Nollet, M. In pages 1353 - 1360, San Francisco, CA, United states, 2009. Analytical procedure;Building typologies;Collapse prevention;Incremental dynamic analysis;Masonry structures;Seismic vulnerability;Seismic vulnerability curves;Structural performance;
Paper abstract bibtex As an approach to the problem of the seismic vulnerability evaluation of existing buildings using the predicted vulnerability method, analytical procedures are applied to produce vulnerability curves for different building classes. For some building types, mainly masonry structures, the development of those curves will be complicated and time consuming if a Finite Element-based method is used. Therefore, the Applied Element Method is used here to develop fragility curves for those challenging building classes. The incremental dynamic analysis of a 6-storey industrial masonry building built in 1906 in Montreal, Canada has been carried out using 14 sets of synthetic and real ground motions representing three M, R categories. Intensity and damage measures are pointed on the IDA curves at three structural performance levels, immediate occupancy, life safety, and collapse prevention, for each ground motion. The statistical analysis of those points is then carried out to develop fragility curves for the masonry building at each performance level. To show the effect of the building typology, those fragility curves are compared with the fragility curve provided by NIBS in HAZUS-MH MR1 Technical and User's Manual for masonry buildings. © 2009 ASCE.
@inproceedings{20101612850988 ,
language = {English},
copyright = {Compilation and indexing terms, Copyright 2023 Elsevier Inc.},
copyright = {Compendex},
title = {Development of seismic vulnerability curves for masonry buildings using the applied element method},
journal = {Improving the Seismic Performance of Existing Buildings and Other Structures - Proc. 2009 ATC and SEI Conference on Improving the Seismic Performance of Existing Buildings and Other Structures},
author = {Karbassi, A. and Nollet, M.-J.},
year = {2009},
pages = {1353 - 1360},
address = {San Francisco, CA, United states},
abstract = {As an approach to the problem of the seismic vulnerability evaluation of existing buildings using the predicted vulnerability method, analytical procedures are applied to produce vulnerability curves for different building classes. For some building types, mainly masonry structures, the development of those curves will be complicated and time consuming if a Finite Element-based method is used. Therefore, the Applied Element Method is used here to develop fragility curves for those challenging building classes. The incremental dynamic analysis of a 6-storey industrial masonry building built in 1906 in Montreal, Canada has been carried out using 14 sets of synthetic and real ground motions representing three M, R categories. Intensity and damage measures are pointed on the IDA curves at three structural performance levels, immediate occupancy, life safety, and collapse prevention, for each ground motion. The statistical analysis of those points is then carried out to develop fragility curves for the masonry building at each performance level. To show the effect of the building typology, those fragility curves are compared with the fragility curve provided by NIBS in HAZUS-MH MR1 Technical and User's Manual for masonry buildings. © 2009 ASCE.<br/>},
key = {Structural analysis},
keywords = {Finite element method;Buildings;Masonry construction;Seismology;Damage detection;Masonry materials;},
note = {Analytical procedure;Building typologies;Collapse prevention;Incremental dynamic analysis;Masonry structures;Seismic vulnerability;Seismic vulnerability curves;Structural performance;},
URL = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/41084(364)124},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"GSQcpy7h3Cdb5z7Bd","bibbaseid":"karbassi-nollet-developmentofseismicvulnerabilitycurvesformasonrybuildingsusingtheappliedelementmethod-2009","author_short":["Karbassi, A.","Nollet, M."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"inproceedings","type":"inproceedings","language":"English","copyright":"Compendex","title":"Development of seismic vulnerability curves for masonry buildings using the applied element method","journal":"Improving the Seismic Performance of Existing Buildings and Other Structures - Proc. 2009 ATC and SEI Conference on Improving the Seismic Performance of Existing Buildings and Other Structures","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Karbassi"],"firstnames":["A."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Nollet"],"firstnames":["M.-J."],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"2009","pages":"1353 - 1360","address":"San Francisco, CA, United states","abstract":"As an approach to the problem of the seismic vulnerability evaluation of existing buildings using the predicted vulnerability method, analytical procedures are applied to produce vulnerability curves for different building classes. For some building types, mainly masonry structures, the development of those curves will be complicated and time consuming if a Finite Element-based method is used. Therefore, the Applied Element Method is used here to develop fragility curves for those challenging building classes. The incremental dynamic analysis of a 6-storey industrial masonry building built in 1906 in Montreal, Canada has been carried out using 14 sets of synthetic and real ground motions representing three M, R categories. Intensity and damage measures are pointed on the IDA curves at three structural performance levels, immediate occupancy, life safety, and collapse prevention, for each ground motion. The statistical analysis of those points is then carried out to develop fragility curves for the masonry building at each performance level. To show the effect of the building typology, those fragility curves are compared with the fragility curve provided by NIBS in HAZUS-MH MR1 Technical and User's Manual for masonry buildings. © 2009 ASCE.<br/>","key":"20101612850988","keywords":"Finite element method;Buildings;Masonry construction;Seismology;Damage detection;Masonry materials;","note":"Analytical procedure;Building typologies;Collapse prevention;Incremental dynamic analysis;Masonry structures;Seismic vulnerability;Seismic vulnerability curves;Structural performance;","url":"http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/41084(364)124","bibtex":"@inproceedings{20101612850988 ,\nlanguage = {English},\ncopyright = {Compilation and indexing terms, Copyright 2023 Elsevier Inc.},\ncopyright = {Compendex},\ntitle = {Development of seismic vulnerability curves for masonry buildings using the applied element method},\njournal = {Improving the Seismic Performance of Existing Buildings and Other Structures - Proc. 2009 ATC and SEI Conference on Improving the Seismic Performance of Existing Buildings and Other Structures},\nauthor = {Karbassi, A. and Nollet, M.-J.},\nyear = {2009},\npages = {1353 - 1360},\naddress = {San Francisco, CA, United states},\nabstract = {As an approach to the problem of the seismic vulnerability evaluation of existing buildings using the predicted vulnerability method, analytical procedures are applied to produce vulnerability curves for different building classes. For some building types, mainly masonry structures, the development of those curves will be complicated and time consuming if a Finite Element-based method is used. Therefore, the Applied Element Method is used here to develop fragility curves for those challenging building classes. The incremental dynamic analysis of a 6-storey industrial masonry building built in 1906 in Montreal, Canada has been carried out using 14 sets of synthetic and real ground motions representing three M, R categories. Intensity and damage measures are pointed on the IDA curves at three structural performance levels, immediate occupancy, life safety, and collapse prevention, for each ground motion. The statistical analysis of those points is then carried out to develop fragility curves for the masonry building at each performance level. To show the effect of the building typology, those fragility curves are compared with the fragility curve provided by NIBS in HAZUS-MH MR1 Technical and User's Manual for masonry buildings. © 2009 ASCE.<br/>},\nkey = {Structural analysis},\nkeywords = {Finite element method;Buildings;Masonry construction;Seismology;Damage detection;Masonry materials;},\nnote = {Analytical procedure;Building typologies;Collapse prevention;Incremental dynamic analysis;Masonry structures;Seismic vulnerability;Seismic vulnerability curves;Structural performance;},\nURL = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/41084(364)124},\n} \n\n\n","author_short":["Karbassi, A.","Nollet, M."],"id":"20101612850988","bibbaseid":"karbassi-nollet-developmentofseismicvulnerabilitycurvesformasonrybuildingsusingtheappliedelementmethod-2009","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/41084(364)124"},"keyword":["Finite element method;Buildings;Masonry construction;Seismology;Damage detection;Masonry materials;"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"inproceedings","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/network/files/m3A3cns49MKmeRzt5","dataSources":["uT2zXYMHTeKLr3NSv","6Aw5QAtT2yLJ3d2JP","qBPxBjrzghRQ4Wzbf","EnwwBMFxopKkypo2f","8uWbXNBCDiEboMj8h"],"keywords":["finite element method;buildings;masonry construction;seismology;damage detection;masonry materials;"],"search_terms":["development","seismic","vulnerability","curves","masonry","buildings","using","applied","element","method","karbassi","nollet"],"title":"Development of seismic vulnerability curves for masonry buildings using the applied element method","year":2009}