Improving the accuracy and efficiency of respiratory rate measurements in children using mobile devices.

Improving the accuracy and efficiency of respiratory rate measurements in children using mobile devices. Karlen, W., Gan, H., Chiu, M., Dunsmuir, D., Zhou, G., Dumont, G., A., & Ansermino, J., M. PLoS ONE, 9(6):e99266, 1, 2014.

Website doi abstract bibtex 6 downloads

The recommended method for measuring respiratory rate (RR) is counting breaths for 60 s using a timer. This method is not efficient in a busy clinical setting. There is an urgent need for a robust, low-cost method that can help front-line health care workers to measure RR quickly and accurately. Our aim was to develop a more efficient RR assessment method. RR was estimated by measuring the median time interval between breaths obtained from tapping on the touch screen of a mobile device. The estimation was continuously validated by measuring consistency (% deviation from the median) of each interval. Data from 30 subjects estimating RR from 10 standard videos with a mobile phone application were collected. A sensitivity analysis and an optimization experiment were performed to verify that a RR could be obtained in less than 60 s; that the accuracy improves when more taps are included into the calculation; and that accuracy improves when inconsistent taps are excluded. The sensitivity analysis showed that excluding inconsistent tapping and increasing the number of tap intervals improved the RR estimation. Efficiency (time to complete measurement) was significantly improved compared to traditional methods that require counting for 60 s. There was a trade-off between accuracy and efficiency. The most balanced optimization result provided a mean efficiency of 9.9 s and a normalized root mean square error of 5.6%, corresponding to 2.2 breaths/min at a respiratory rate of 40 breaths/min. The obtained 6-fold increase in mean efficiency combined with a clinically acceptable error makes this approach a viable solution for further clinical testing. The sensitivity analysis illustrating the trade-off between accuracy and efficiency will be a useful tool to define a target product profile for any novel RR estimation device.

@article{
 title = {Improving the accuracy and efficiency of respiratory rate measurements in children using mobile devices.},
 type = {article},
 year = {2014},
 pages = {e99266},
 volume = {9},
 websites = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24919062,http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=4053345&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract},
 month = {1},
 id = {85b8529a-fe50-3e24-836f-838048f2b379},
 created = {2021-11-19T08:07:17.650Z},
 accessed = {2014-08-07},
 file_attached = {true},
 profile_id = {6d353feb-efe4-367e-84a2-0815eb9ca878},
 last_modified = {2022-09-04T18:12:14.514Z},
 read = {false},
 starred = {false},
 authored = {true},
 confirmed = {true},
 hidden = {false},
 citation_key = {Karlen2014},
 folder_uuids = {f1f67efc-95a7-4f1a-b181-c3670c667a34,c861438a-f137-4be3-8c86-0f244c523c17},
 private_publication = {false},
 abstract = {The recommended method for measuring respiratory rate (RR) is counting breaths for 60 s using a timer. This method is not efficient in a busy clinical setting. There is an urgent need for a robust, low-cost method that can help front-line health care workers to measure RR quickly and accurately. Our aim was to develop a more efficient RR assessment method. RR was estimated by measuring the median time interval between breaths obtained from tapping on the touch screen of a mobile device. The estimation was continuously validated by measuring consistency (% deviation from the median) of each interval. Data from 30 subjects estimating RR from 10 standard videos with a mobile phone application were collected. A sensitivity analysis and an optimization experiment were performed to verify that a RR could be obtained in less than 60 s; that the accuracy improves when more taps are included into the calculation; and that accuracy improves when inconsistent taps are excluded. The sensitivity analysis showed that excluding inconsistent tapping and increasing the number of tap intervals improved the RR estimation. Efficiency (time to complete measurement) was significantly improved compared to traditional methods that require counting for 60 s. There was a trade-off between accuracy and efficiency. The most balanced optimization result provided a mean efficiency of 9.9 s and a normalized root mean square error of 5.6%, corresponding to 2.2 breaths/min at a respiratory rate of 40 breaths/min. The obtained 6-fold increase in mean efficiency combined with a clinically acceptable error makes this approach a viable solution for further clinical testing. The sensitivity analysis illustrating the trade-off between accuracy and efficiency will be a useful tool to define a target product profile for any novel RR estimation device.},
 bibtype = {article},
 author = {Karlen, Walter and Gan, Heng and Chiu, Michelle and Dunsmuir, Dustin and Zhou, Guohai and Dumont, Guy A and Ansermino, J Mark},
 doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0099266},
 journal = {PLoS ONE},
 number = {6}
}

Downloads: 6