Adult age differences in recognition memory and frequency judgments for planned versus performed activities. Kausler, D. H., Lichty, W., & Freund, J. S. Developmental Psychology, 21(4):647–654, July, 1985. Publisher: American Psychological Association![Adult age differences in recognition memory and frequency judgments for planned versus performed activities [link]](https://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/link.svg "link")
Paper doi abstract bibtex 24 young (18.25–27.92 yrs old) and 24 elderly (62.75–80.42 yrs old) adults received a series of tasks (e.g., card sorting, arithmetic) that were planned for performance and subsequently performed with varying frequencies under intentional- and incidental-memory conditions to investigate age differences in active memory. Following the series of tasks, Ss estimated the frequencies with which task activities had been both performed and planned. Recognition-memory scores derived from performance-judgment scores revealed a significant age deficit in Ss' identification of those activities that had been performed earlier. However, memory was unaffected by intentionality at each age level. Results imply a modest age deficit for encoding rehearsal-independent, episodic events, but no age differences were found for reality monitoring: Elderly Ss were as proficient as young Ss in discriminating between planning and performance of an activity in terms of absolute frequency-judgment scores. (15 ref) (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)
@article{kausler_adult_1985,
title = {Adult age differences in recognition memory and frequency judgments for planned versus performed activities},
volume = {21},
issn = {0012-1649},
url = {https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,uid&db=psyh&AN=1985-30442-001&site=ehost-live},
doi = {10.1037/0012-1649.21.4.647},
abstract = {24 young (18.25–27.92 yrs old) and 24 elderly (62.75–80.42 yrs old) adults received a series of tasks (e.g., card sorting, arithmetic) that were planned for performance and subsequently performed with varying frequencies under intentional- and incidental-memory conditions to investigate age differences in active memory. Following the series of tasks, Ss estimated the frequencies with which task activities had been both performed and planned. Recognition-memory scores derived from performance-judgment scores revealed a significant age deficit in Ss' identification of those activities that had been performed earlier. However, memory was unaffected by intentionality at each age level. Results imply a modest age deficit for encoding rehearsal-independent, episodic events, but no age differences were found for reality monitoring: Elderly Ss were as proficient as young Ss in discriminating between planning and performance of an activity in terms of absolute frequency-judgment scores. (15 ref) (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)},
number = {4},
journal = {Developmental Psychology},
author = {Kausler, Donald H. and Lichty, Wemara and Freund, Joel S.},
month = jul,
year = {1985},
note = {Publisher: American Psychological Association},
keywords = {18.3–27.9 vs 62.7–80.4 yr olds, Age Differences, Human Information Storage, Memory, Recognition (Learning), memory \& frequency judgments for planned vs performed tasks},
pages = {647--654},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"MhC6yaQNSkXGtBnz7","bibbaseid":"kausler-lichty-freund-adultagedifferencesinrecognitionmemoryandfrequencyjudgmentsforplannedversusperformedactivities-1985","author_short":["Kausler, D. H.","Lichty, W.","Freund, J. S."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Adult age differences in recognition memory and frequency judgments for planned versus performed activities","volume":"21","issn":"0012-1649","url":"https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,uid&db=psyh&AN=1985-30442-001&site=ehost-live","doi":"10.1037/0012-1649.21.4.647","abstract":"24 young (18.25–27.92 yrs old) and 24 elderly (62.75–80.42 yrs old) adults received a series of tasks (e.g., card sorting, arithmetic) that were planned for performance and subsequently performed with varying frequencies under intentional- and incidental-memory conditions to investigate age differences in active memory. Following the series of tasks, Ss estimated the frequencies with which task activities had been both performed and planned. Recognition-memory scores derived from performance-judgment scores revealed a significant age deficit in Ss' identification of those activities that had been performed earlier. However, memory was unaffected by intentionality at each age level. Results imply a modest age deficit for encoding rehearsal-independent, episodic events, but no age differences were found for reality monitoring: Elderly Ss were as proficient as young Ss in discriminating between planning and performance of an activity in terms of absolute frequency-judgment scores. (15 ref) (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)","number":"4","journal":"Developmental Psychology","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Kausler"],"firstnames":["Donald","H."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Lichty"],"firstnames":["Wemara"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Freund"],"firstnames":["Joel","S."],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"July","year":"1985","note":"Publisher: American Psychological Association","keywords":"18.3–27.9 vs 62.7–80.4 yr olds, Age Differences, Human Information Storage, Memory, Recognition (Learning), memory & frequency judgments for planned vs performed tasks","pages":"647–654","bibtex":"@article{kausler_adult_1985,\n\ttitle = {Adult age differences in recognition memory and frequency judgments for planned versus performed activities},\n\tvolume = {21},\n\tissn = {0012-1649},\n\turl = {https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,uid&db=psyh&AN=1985-30442-001&site=ehost-live},\n\tdoi = {10.1037/0012-1649.21.4.647},\n\tabstract = {24 young (18.25–27.92 yrs old) and 24 elderly (62.75–80.42 yrs old) adults received a series of tasks (e.g., card sorting, arithmetic) that were planned for performance and subsequently performed with varying frequencies under intentional- and incidental-memory conditions to investigate age differences in active memory. Following the series of tasks, Ss estimated the frequencies with which task activities had been both performed and planned. Recognition-memory scores derived from performance-judgment scores revealed a significant age deficit in Ss' identification of those activities that had been performed earlier. However, memory was unaffected by intentionality at each age level. Results imply a modest age deficit for encoding rehearsal-independent, episodic events, but no age differences were found for reality monitoring: Elderly Ss were as proficient as young Ss in discriminating between planning and performance of an activity in terms of absolute frequency-judgment scores. (15 ref) (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)},\n\tnumber = {4},\n\tjournal = {Developmental Psychology},\n\tauthor = {Kausler, Donald H. and Lichty, Wemara and Freund, Joel S.},\n\tmonth = jul,\n\tyear = {1985},\n\tnote = {Publisher: American Psychological Association},\n\tkeywords = {18.3–27.9 vs 62.7–80.4 yr olds, Age Differences, Human Information Storage, Memory, Recognition (Learning), memory \\& frequency judgments for planned vs performed tasks},\n\tpages = {647--654},\n}\n\n\n\n","author_short":["Kausler, D. H.","Lichty, W.","Freund, J. S."],"key":"kausler_adult_1985","id":"kausler_adult_1985","bibbaseid":"kausler-lichty-freund-adultagedifferencesinrecognitionmemoryandfrequencyjudgmentsforplannedversusperformedactivities-1985","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,uid&db=psyh&AN=1985-30442-001&site=ehost-live"},"keyword":["18.3–27.9 vs 62.7–80.4 yr olds","Age Differences","Human Information Storage","Memory","Recognition (Learning)","memory & frequency judgments for planned vs performed tasks"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"html":""},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero/saurabhr","dataSources":["nxjWwW7fWbb5tfpKz"],"keywords":["18.3–27.9 vs 62.7–80.4 yr olds","age differences","human information storage","memory","recognition (learning)","memory & frequency judgments for planned vs performed tasks"],"search_terms":["adult","age","differences","recognition","memory","frequency","judgments","planned","versus","performed","activities","kausler","lichty","freund"],"title":"Adult age differences in recognition memory and frequency judgments for planned versus performed activities","year":1985}