Epistemic 'othering' and the decolonisation of knowledge. Keet, A. Africa Insight, 44(1):23–37, June, 2014. Publisher: Human Sciences Research Council (HSRC)
Paper doi abstract bibtex In this article I make the case that epistemic othering constitutes epistemic injustice, which is inscribed in the disciplinary formations of knowledge. As they help us produce our world, these formations, nowadays, preside over a considerable part of university practices and their conditions of privilege and disadvantage. The epistemic injustice within disciplines, so I argue, renders the collective interpretive resources required for epistemic justice structurally prejudiced. Using Fricker's notions of epistemic injustice and Foucault's distinction between savoir and connaissance, I suggest a new definitional framework for the decolonisation of knowledge with concomitant possibilities for innovative knowledge practices that view epistemic justice as central to the disruption of the disciplines.
@article{keet_epistemic_2014,
title = {Epistemic 'othering' and the decolonisation of knowledge},
volume = {44},
url = {https://journals.co.za/doi/abs/10.10520/EJC161966},
doi = {10.10520/EJC161966},
abstract = {In this article I make the case that epistemic othering constitutes epistemic injustice, which is inscribed in the disciplinary formations of knowledge. As they help us produce our world, these formations, nowadays, preside over a considerable part of university practices and their conditions of privilege and disadvantage. The epistemic injustice within disciplines, so I argue, renders the collective interpretive resources required for epistemic justice structurally prejudiced. Using Fricker's notions of epistemic injustice and Foucault's distinction between savoir and connaissance, I suggest a new definitional framework for the decolonisation of knowledge with concomitant possibilities for innovative knowledge practices that view epistemic justice as central to the disruption of the disciplines.},
number = {1},
urldate = {2024-03-19},
journal = {Africa Insight},
author = {Keet, Andre},
month = jun,
year = {2014},
note = {Publisher: Human Sciences Research Council (HSRC)},
pages = {23--37},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"qzn5vNzTaY6o4hK39","bibbaseid":"keet-epistemicotheringandthedecolonisationofknowledge-2014","author_short":["Keet, A."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Epistemic 'othering' and the decolonisation of knowledge","volume":"44","url":"https://journals.co.za/doi/abs/10.10520/EJC161966","doi":"10.10520/EJC161966","abstract":"In this article I make the case that epistemic othering constitutes epistemic injustice, which is inscribed in the disciplinary formations of knowledge. As they help us produce our world, these formations, nowadays, preside over a considerable part of university practices and their conditions of privilege and disadvantage. The epistemic injustice within disciplines, so I argue, renders the collective interpretive resources required for epistemic justice structurally prejudiced. Using Fricker's notions of epistemic injustice and Foucault's distinction between savoir and connaissance, I suggest a new definitional framework for the decolonisation of knowledge with concomitant possibilities for innovative knowledge practices that view epistemic justice as central to the disruption of the disciplines.","number":"1","urldate":"2024-03-19","journal":"Africa Insight","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Keet"],"firstnames":["Andre"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"June","year":"2014","note":"Publisher: Human Sciences Research Council (HSRC)","pages":"23–37","bibtex":"@article{keet_epistemic_2014,\n\ttitle = {Epistemic 'othering' and the decolonisation of knowledge},\n\tvolume = {44},\n\turl = {https://journals.co.za/doi/abs/10.10520/EJC161966},\n\tdoi = {10.10520/EJC161966},\n\tabstract = {In this article I make the case that epistemic othering constitutes epistemic injustice, which is inscribed in the disciplinary formations of knowledge. As they help us produce our world, these formations, nowadays, preside over a considerable part of university practices and their conditions of privilege and disadvantage. The epistemic injustice within disciplines, so I argue, renders the collective interpretive resources required for epistemic justice structurally prejudiced. Using Fricker's notions of epistemic injustice and Foucault's distinction between savoir and connaissance, I suggest a new definitional framework for the decolonisation of knowledge with concomitant possibilities for innovative knowledge practices that view epistemic justice as central to the disruption of the disciplines.},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2024-03-19},\n\tjournal = {Africa Insight},\n\tauthor = {Keet, Andre},\n\tmonth = jun,\n\tyear = {2014},\n\tnote = {Publisher: Human Sciences Research Council (HSRC)},\n\tpages = {23--37},\n}\n\n\n\n","author_short":["Keet, A."],"key":"keet_epistemic_2014","id":"keet_epistemic_2014","bibbaseid":"keet-epistemicotheringandthedecolonisationofknowledge-2014","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://journals.co.za/doi/abs/10.10520/EJC161966"},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"downloads":0,"html":""},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero/niklasj.b","dataSources":["WKomETnBq4AHwocGn"],"keywords":[],"search_terms":["epistemic","othering","decolonisation","knowledge","keet"],"title":"Epistemic 'othering' and the decolonisation of knowledge","year":2014}