Transitioning policy: co-production of a new strategic framework for energy innovation policy in the Netherlands. Kemp, R. & Rotmans, J. Policy Sciences, 42(4):303--322, November, 2009.
Paper doi abstract bibtex Abstract This article describes policy–science interactions in a transition process in which we were involved as scientists. We describe the interactions that occurred in a project for the fourth National Environmental Policy Plan in the Netherlands. The project was successful in that it produced a new concept and set of principles for policy to deal with persistent problems such as global climate change, which were used in the national policy plan. The new concept was that of transition and the principles were: policy integration, long-term thinking for short-term action, keeping multiple options open and learning-by-doing and doing-by-learning. Retrospectively, we ask ourselves: what factors facilitated the acceptance of the first ideas about transition management? Reconstructing the events and drawing on interviews with key individuals involved, we have tried to find the key factors for the adoption of the ideas developed in the project. Finally, we reflect upon our role as scientists-advisors and the role of others in the development of a new story line and set of principles for policy. Our own assessment, 8 years later, is that we were engaged in boundary work.
@article{kemp_transitioning_2009,
title = {Transitioning policy: co-production of a new strategic framework for energy innovation policy in the {Netherlands}},
volume = {42},
shorttitle = {Transitioning policy},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11077-009-9105-3},
doi = {10.1007/s11077-009-9105-3},
abstract = {Abstract This article describes policy–science interactions in a transition process in which we were involved as scientists. We describe
the interactions that occurred in a project for the fourth National Environmental Policy Plan in the Netherlands. The project
was successful in that it produced a new concept and set of principles for policy to deal with persistent problems such as
global climate change, which were used in the national policy plan. The new concept was that of transition and the principles
were: policy integration, long-term thinking for short-term action, keeping multiple options open and learning-by-doing and
doing-by-learning. Retrospectively, we ask ourselves: what factors facilitated the acceptance of the first ideas about transition
management? Reconstructing the events and drawing on interviews with key individuals involved, we have tried to find the key
factors for the adoption of the ideas developed in the project. Finally, we reflect upon our role as scientists-advisors and
the role of others in the development of a new story line and set of principles for policy. Our own assessment, 8 years later,
is that we were engaged in boundary work.},
number = {4},
urldate = {2010-01-22},
journal = {Policy Sciences},
author = {Kemp, René and Rotmans, Jan},
month = nov,
year = {2009},
pages = {303--322},
file = {SpringerLink Snapshot:files/21550/q6g72rv04l02l132.html:text/html}
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"9RnZXEkadgCGae6P8","bibbaseid":"kemp-rotmans-transitioningpolicycoproductionofanewstrategicframeworkforenergyinnovationpolicyinthenetherlands-2009","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2016-09-09T06:27:28.521Z","title":"Transitioning policy: co-production of a new strategic framework for energy innovation policy in the Netherlands","author_short":["Kemp, R.","Rotmans, J."],"year":2009,"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://www.sfu.ca/~howlett/howlett16.bib","bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Transitioning policy: co-production of a new strategic framework for energy innovation policy in the Netherlands","volume":"42","shorttitle":"Transitioning policy","url":"http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11077-009-9105-3","doi":"10.1007/s11077-009-9105-3","abstract":"Abstract This article describes policy–science interactions in a transition process in which we were involved as scientists. We describe the interactions that occurred in a project for the fourth National Environmental Policy Plan in the Netherlands. The project was successful in that it produced a new concept and set of principles for policy to deal with persistent problems such as global climate change, which were used in the national policy plan. The new concept was that of transition and the principles were: policy integration, long-term thinking for short-term action, keeping multiple options open and learning-by-doing and doing-by-learning. Retrospectively, we ask ourselves: what factors facilitated the acceptance of the first ideas about transition management? Reconstructing the events and drawing on interviews with key individuals involved, we have tried to find the key factors for the adoption of the ideas developed in the project. Finally, we reflect upon our role as scientists-advisors and the role of others in the development of a new story line and set of principles for policy. Our own assessment, 8 years later, is that we were engaged in boundary work.","number":"4","urldate":"2010-01-22","journal":"Policy Sciences","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Kemp"],"firstnames":["René"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Rotmans"],"firstnames":["Jan"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"November","year":"2009","pages":"303--322","file":"SpringerLink Snapshot:files/21550/q6g72rv04l02l132.html:text/html","bibtex":"@article{kemp_transitioning_2009,\n\ttitle = {Transitioning policy: co-production of a new strategic framework for energy innovation policy in the {Netherlands}},\n\tvolume = {42},\n\tshorttitle = {Transitioning policy},\n\turl = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11077-009-9105-3},\n\tdoi = {10.1007/s11077-009-9105-3},\n\tabstract = {Abstract This article describes policy–science interactions in a transition process in which we were involved as scientists. We describe\nthe interactions that occurred in a project for the fourth National Environmental Policy Plan in the Netherlands. The project\nwas successful in that it produced a new concept and set of principles for policy to deal with persistent problems such as\nglobal climate change, which were used in the national policy plan. The new concept was that of transition and the principles\nwere: policy integration, long-term thinking for short-term action, keeping multiple options open and learning-by-doing and\ndoing-by-learning. Retrospectively, we ask ourselves: what factors facilitated the acceptance of the first ideas about transition\nmanagement? Reconstructing the events and drawing on interviews with key individuals involved, we have tried to find the key\nfactors for the adoption of the ideas developed in the project. Finally, we reflect upon our role as scientists-advisors and\nthe role of others in the development of a new story line and set of principles for policy. Our own assessment, 8 years later,\nis that we were engaged in boundary work.},\n\tnumber = {4},\n\turldate = {2010-01-22},\n\tjournal = {Policy Sciences},\n\tauthor = {Kemp, René and Rotmans, Jan},\n\tmonth = nov,\n\tyear = {2009},\n\tpages = {303--322},\n\tfile = {SpringerLink Snapshot:files/21550/q6g72rv04l02l132.html:text/html}\n}\n\n","author_short":["Kemp, R.","Rotmans, J."],"key":"kemp_transitioning_2009","id":"kemp_transitioning_2009","bibbaseid":"kemp-rotmans-transitioningpolicycoproductionofanewstrategicframeworkforenergyinnovationpolicyinthenetherlands-2009","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11077-009-9105-3"},"downloads":0},"search_terms":["transitioning","policy","production","new","strategic","framework","energy","innovation","policy","netherlands","kemp","rotmans"],"keywords":[],"authorIDs":[],"dataSources":["Bn7xRaKMY43f7hFwh"]}