Archival turns and returns. Ketelaar, E. In Gilliland, A., McKemmish, S., & Lau, A., editors, Research in the Archival Multiverse, pages 228–268. 2018.
Archival turns and returns [link]Paper  abstract   bibtex   
The past fifteen years have witnessed a growing multidisciplinary interest in different aspects of archives and archival phenomena. The most notable movement was the “archival turn” in various disciplines. Outside the traditional boundaries of archival science (archivistics) a new concept of “the archive” has been embraced by anthropologists, sociologists, psychologists, philosophers, cultural and literary theorists, and artists. This paper charts the paradigms of various “archiviologies” as caused by the “archival turn”, and suggests how these could yield “archival returns” or new perspectives enriching archival theory, methodology, and practice.
@incollection{ketelaar_archival_2018,
	title = {Archival turns and returns},
	isbn = {978-1-876924-67-6},
	url = {https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/31429},
	abstract = {The  past  fifteen  years  have  witnessed  a  growing  multidisciplinary  interest  in  different  aspects  of  archives  and  archival  phenomena.  The  most  notable  movement  was  the  “archival  turn”  in  various  disciplines.  Outside  the  traditional  boundaries  of  archival  science  (archivistics)  a  new  concept  of  “the  archive”  has  been  embraced  by  anthropologists,  sociologists,  psychologists,  philosophers,  cultural  and  literary  theorists,  and  artists.  This  paper  charts  the  paradigms  of  various  “archiviologies”  as  caused  by  the  “archival  turn”,  and  suggests  how  these  could  yield  “archival  returns”  or  new  perspectives  enriching  archival theory, methodology, and practice.},
	booktitle = {Research in the {Archival} {Multiverse}},
	author = {Ketelaar, Eric},
	editor = {Gilliland, Anne and McKemmish, Sue and Lau, Andrew},
	year = {2018},
	keywords = {Read},
	pages = {228--268},
}

Downloads: 0