@phdthesis{ kim_collusion_2009,
  address = {United States -- New Jersey},
  type = {{Ph.D.}},
  title = {Collusion and Subversion: Luke's Representation of the Roman Empire},
  copyright = {Copyright {ProQuest}, {UMI} Dissertations Publishing 2009},
  shorttitle = {Collusion and subversion},
  abstract = {As a literary product of the colonial domination of the first century C. E. Roman Empire, Luke-Acts inevitably contains numerous traces of complicated interrelations and exchanges between the colonizers and the colonized. A careful reading of Luke-Acts thus reveals that both collusive and subversive materials are concomitant in it. Moreover, whereas the Lukan narrative sometimes parodies or mocks the Roman imperial/colonial rule, in other cases Luke tends to (unconsciously?) mirror or inscribe the "grand tradition" of the empire. In this sense, it can be argued that the text of Luke-Acts itself is fundamentally unstable, especially when representing Rome. In other words, Luke's perspective on the empire is not fixed, but oscillates between two extremes, i.e., attraction and repulsion. Luke-Acts is a very complicated book in terms of its representation of Rome, mainly because Luke himself is complicated in his stance on the empire.},
  school = {Drew University},
  author = {Kim, Ho Sung},
  year = {2009},
  note = {00000},
  keywords = {Attraction and repulsion, Colonial ambivalence, Colonial mimicry, Hybridity, Luke-Acts, Philosophy, Roman Empire, religion and theology}
}

{"_id":{"_str":"53a4fe7b2d7be897270040d3"},"__v":0,"authorIDs":[],"author_short":["Kim","Sung, H."],"bibbaseid":"kim-sung-collusionandsubversionlukesrepresentationoftheromanempire-2009","bibdata":{"html":"","downloads":0,"keyword":["Attraction and repulsion","Colonial ambivalence","Colonial mimicry","Hybridity","Luke-Acts","Philosophy","Roman Empire","religion and theology"],"bibbaseid":"kim-sung-collusionandsubversionlukesrepresentationoftheromanempire-2009","role":"author","year":"2009","type":"Ph.D.","title":"Collusion and Subversion: Luke's Representation of the Roman Empire","shorttitle":"Collusion and subversion","school":"Drew University","note":"00000","keywords":"Attraction and repulsion, Colonial ambivalence, Colonial mimicry, Hybridity, Luke-Acts, Philosophy, Roman Empire, religion and theology","key":"kim_collusion_2009","id":"kim_collusion_2009","copyright":"Copyright ProQuest, UMI Dissertations Publishing 2009","bibtype":"phdthesis","bibtex":"@phdthesis{ kim_collusion_2009,\n address = {United States -- New Jersey},\n type = {{Ph.D.}},\n title = {Collusion and Subversion: Luke's Representation of the Roman Empire},\n copyright = {Copyright {ProQuest}, {UMI} Dissertations Publishing 2009},\n shorttitle = {Collusion and subversion},\n abstract = {As a literary product of the colonial domination of the first century C. E. Roman Empire, Luke-Acts inevitably contains numerous traces of complicated interrelations and exchanges between the colonizers and the colonized. A careful reading of Luke-Acts thus reveals that both collusive and subversive materials are concomitant in it. Moreover, whereas the Lukan narrative sometimes parodies or mocks the Roman imperial/colonial rule, in other cases Luke tends to (unconsciously?) mirror or inscribe the \"grand tradition\" of the empire. In this sense, it can be argued that the text of Luke-Acts itself is fundamentally unstable, especially when representing Rome. In other words, Luke's perspective on the empire is not fixed, but oscillates between two extremes, i.e., attraction and repulsion. Luke-Acts is a very complicated book in terms of its representation of Rome, mainly because Luke himself is complicated in his stance on the empire.},\n school = {Drew University},\n author = {Kim, Ho Sung},\n year = {2009},\n note = {00000},\n keywords = {Attraction and repulsion, Colonial ambivalence, Colonial mimicry, Hybridity, Luke-Acts, Philosophy, Roman Empire, religion and theology}\n}","author_short":["Kim","Sung, H."],"author":["Kim","Sung, Ho"],"address":"United States -- New Jersey","abstract":"As a literary product of the colonial domination of the first century C. E. Roman Empire, Luke-Acts inevitably contains numerous traces of complicated interrelations and exchanges between the colonizers and the colonized. A careful reading of Luke-Acts thus reveals that both collusive and subversive materials are concomitant in it. Moreover, whereas the Lukan narrative sometimes parodies or mocks the Roman imperial/colonial rule, in other cases Luke tends to (unconsciously?) mirror or inscribe the \"grand tradition\" of the empire. In this sense, it can be argued that the text of Luke-Acts itself is fundamentally unstable, especially when representing Rome. In other words, Luke's perspective on the empire is not fixed, but oscillates between two extremes, i.e., attraction and repulsion. Luke-Acts is a very complicated book in terms of its representation of Rome, mainly because Luke himself is complicated in his stance on the empire."},"bibtype":"phdthesis","biburl":"http://bibbase.org/zotero/darrellbuchanan","downloads":0,"keywords":["attraction and repulsion","colonial ambivalence","colonial mimicry","hybridity","luke-acts","philosophy","roman empire","religion and theology"],"search_terms":["collusion","subversion","luke","representation","roman","empire","kim","sung"],"title":"Collusion and Subversion: Luke's Representation of the Roman Empire","year":2009,"dataSources":["azaF3ncauztTByDGR"]}