@incollection{kind_ignorance_2023,
	title = {Ignorance is no defense: {Reply} to {Daniel} {Stoljar}},
	isbn = {978-1-00-086660-5 978-0-367-33242-6},
	url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85166149190&doi=10.4324%2f9780429324017-5&partnerID=40&md5=2260c58cb60d68d496c7765889592474},
	abstract = {This chapter responds to Stoljar’s defense of a non-standard version of physicalism, what he calls the epistemic view. It offers reasons to think that the view is unsatisfactory.},
	language = {English},
	booktitle = {What is {Consciousness}? {A} {Debate}},
	publisher = {Routledge},
	author = {Kind, Amy},
	year = {2023},
	doi = {10.4324/9780429324017-5},
	note = {Publication Title: What is Consciousness?: A Debate
Type: Book chapter},
	pages = {135--154},
}

{"_id":"PHykzt9oXqYQLf235","bibbaseid":"kind-ignoranceisnodefensereplytodanielstoljar-2023","author_short":["Kind, A."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"incollection","type":"incollection","title":"Ignorance is no defense: Reply to Daniel Stoljar","isbn":"978-1-00-086660-5 978-0-367-33242-6","url":"https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85166149190&doi=10.4324%2f9780429324017-5&partnerID=40&md5=2260c58cb60d68d496c7765889592474","abstract":"This chapter responds to Stoljar’s defense of a non-standard version of physicalism, what he calls the epistemic view. It offers reasons to think that the view is unsatisfactory.","language":"English","booktitle":"What is Consciousness? A Debate","publisher":"Routledge","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Kind"],"firstnames":["Amy"],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"2023","doi":"10.4324/9780429324017-5","note":"Publication Title: What is Consciousness?: A Debate Type: Book chapter","pages":"135–154","bibtex":"@incollection{kind_ignorance_2023,\n\ttitle = {Ignorance is no defense: {Reply} to {Daniel} {Stoljar}},\n\tisbn = {978-1-00-086660-5 978-0-367-33242-6},\n\turl = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85166149190&doi=10.4324%2f9780429324017-5&partnerID=40&md5=2260c58cb60d68d496c7765889592474},\n\tabstract = {This chapter responds to Stoljar’s defense of a non-standard version of physicalism, what he calls the epistemic view. It offers reasons to think that the view is unsatisfactory.},\n\tlanguage = {English},\n\tbooktitle = {What is {Consciousness}? {A} {Debate}},\n\tpublisher = {Routledge},\n\tauthor = {Kind, Amy},\n\tyear = {2023},\n\tdoi = {10.4324/9780429324017-5},\n\tnote = {Publication Title: What is Consciousness?: A Debate\nType: Book chapter},\n\tpages = {135--154},\n}\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n","author_short":["Kind, A."],"key":"kind_ignorance_2023","id":"kind_ignorance_2023","bibbaseid":"kind-ignoranceisnodefensereplytodanielstoljar-2023","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85166149190&doi=10.4324%2f9780429324017-5&partnerID=40&md5=2260c58cb60d68d496c7765889592474"},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"incollection","biburl":"http://bibbase.org/zotero-group/science_et_ignorance/1340424","dataSources":["zX4acseCDM6D58AW7"],"keywords":[],"search_terms":["ignorance","defense","reply","daniel","stoljar","kind"],"title":"Ignorance is no defense: Reply to Daniel Stoljar","year":2023}