@article{kioupkiolis_transforming_2022,
	title = {Transforming city government: {Italian} variants on urban commoning},
	volume = {44},
	issn = {1084-1806},
	shorttitle = {Transforming city government},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2021.1945374},
	doi = {10.1080/10841806.2021.1945374},
	abstract = {This paper examines nascent alternative approaches to “commoning” and “common goods” that have been developed over the last decade by a unique coalition of lawyers, grassroots initiatives, and local governments in Italian cities, notably Bologna and Naples. The aim is to flesh out and to critically appraise two variants of a strategy for advancing urban commons in the direction of Integrative Governance, civic equality, power-with, solidarity, plurality, openness, and care for the city: the “Bologna Model” and the “Neapolitan Way.” The argument is that the two strategies diverge in crucial respects, the former being more top-down and potentially compromising than the latter. Both, however, bear promise and potential for commons-oriented change, opening up processes of new social invention, deeper democratization, political contestation, and counter-hegemonic intervention.},
	number = {3},
	urldate = {2022-10-10},
	journal = {Administrative Theory \& Praxis},
	author = {Kioupkiolis, Alexandros},
	month = jul,
	year = {2022},
	note = {2 citations (Semantic Scholar/DOI) [2022-10-10]
Publisher: Routledge
\_eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2021.1945374},
	keywords = {Commons, Italian cities, alternative politics, city administration, civic use},
	pages = {186--204},
}

{"_id":"WTkqBvRosbbQE9agb","bibbaseid":"kioupkiolis-transformingcitygovernmentitalianvariantsonurbancommoning-2022","author_short":["Kioupkiolis, A."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Transforming city government: Italian variants on urban commoning","volume":"44","issn":"1084-1806","shorttitle":"Transforming city government","url":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2021.1945374","doi":"10.1080/10841806.2021.1945374","abstract":"This paper examines nascent alternative approaches to “commoning” and “common goods” that have been developed over the last decade by a unique coalition of lawyers, grassroots initiatives, and local governments in Italian cities, notably Bologna and Naples. The aim is to flesh out and to critically appraise two variants of a strategy for advancing urban commons in the direction of Integrative Governance, civic equality, power-with, solidarity, plurality, openness, and care for the city: the “Bologna Model” and the “Neapolitan Way.” The argument is that the two strategies diverge in crucial respects, the former being more top-down and potentially compromising than the latter. Both, however, bear promise and potential for commons-oriented change, opening up processes of new social invention, deeper democratization, political contestation, and counter-hegemonic intervention.","number":"3","urldate":"2022-10-10","journal":"Administrative Theory & Praxis","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Kioupkiolis"],"firstnames":["Alexandros"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"July","year":"2022","note":"2 citations (Semantic Scholar/DOI) [2022-10-10] Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2021.1945374","keywords":"Commons, Italian cities, alternative politics, city administration, civic use","pages":"186–204","bibtex":"@article{kioupkiolis_transforming_2022,\n\ttitle = {Transforming city government: {Italian} variants on urban commoning},\n\tvolume = {44},\n\tissn = {1084-1806},\n\tshorttitle = {Transforming city government},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2021.1945374},\n\tdoi = {10.1080/10841806.2021.1945374},\n\tabstract = {This paper examines nascent alternative approaches to “commoning” and “common goods” that have been developed over the last decade by a unique coalition of lawyers, grassroots initiatives, and local governments in Italian cities, notably Bologna and Naples. The aim is to flesh out and to critically appraise two variants of a strategy for advancing urban commons in the direction of Integrative Governance, civic equality, power-with, solidarity, plurality, openness, and care for the city: the “Bologna Model” and the “Neapolitan Way.” The argument is that the two strategies diverge in crucial respects, the former being more top-down and potentially compromising than the latter. Both, however, bear promise and potential for commons-oriented change, opening up processes of new social invention, deeper democratization, political contestation, and counter-hegemonic intervention.},\n\tnumber = {3},\n\turldate = {2022-10-10},\n\tjournal = {Administrative Theory \\& Praxis},\n\tauthor = {Kioupkiolis, Alexandros},\n\tmonth = jul,\n\tyear = {2022},\n\tnote = {2 citations (Semantic Scholar/DOI) [2022-10-10]\nPublisher: Routledge\n\\_eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2021.1945374},\n\tkeywords = {Commons, Italian cities, alternative politics, city administration, civic use},\n\tpages = {186--204},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Kioupkiolis, A."],"key":"kioupkiolis_transforming_2022","id":"kioupkiolis_transforming_2022","bibbaseid":"kioupkiolis-transformingcitygovernmentitalianvariantsonurbancommoning-2022","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2021.1945374"},"keyword":["Commons","Italian cities","alternative politics","city administration","civic use"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"html":""},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero/johnandsci","dataSources":["nQZviL9qxJNFkEnq7"],"keywords":["commons","italian cities","alternative politics","city administration","civic use"],"search_terms":["transforming","city","government","italian","variants","urban","commoning","kioupkiolis"],"title":"Transforming city government: Italian variants on urban commoning","year":2022}