Outcomes of a Partnered Facilitation Strategy to Implement Primary Care-Mental Health. Kirchner, J., E., Ritchie, M., J., Pitcock, J., A., Parker, L., E., Curran, G., M., & Fortney, J., C. Journal of general internal medicine, 10, 2014. abstract bibtex BACKGROUND: Implementing new programs and practices is challenging, even when they are mandated. Implementation Facilitation (IF) strategies that focus on partnering with sites show promise for addressing these challenges. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of an external/internal IF strategy within the context of a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) mandate of Primary Care-Mental Health Integration (PC-MHI). DESIGN: This was a quasi-experimental, Hybrid Type III study. Generalized estimating equations assessed differences across sites. PARTICIPANTS: Patients and providers at seven VA primary care clinics receiving the IF intervention and national support and seven matched comparison clinics receiving national support only participated in the study. INTERVENTION: We used a highly partnered IF strategy incorporating evidence-based implementation interventions. MAIN MEASURES: We evaluated the IF strategy using VA administrative data and RE-AIM framework measures for two 6-month periods. KEY RESULTS: Evaluation of RE-AIM measures from the first 6-month period indicated that PC patients at IF clinics had nine times the odds (OR=8.93, p<0.001) of also being seen in PC-MHI (Reach) compared to patients at non-IF clinics. PC providers at IF clinics had seven times the odds (OR=7.12, p=0.029) of referring patients to PC-MHI (Adoption) than providers at non-IF clinics, and a greater proportion of providers' patients at IF clinics were referred to PC-MHI (Adoption) compared to non-IF clinics (beta=0.027, p<0.001). Compared to PC patients at non-IF sites, patients at IF clinics did not have lower odds (OR=1.34, p=0.232) of being referred for first-time mental health specialty clinic visits (Effectiveness), or higher odds (OR=1.90, p=0.350) of receiving same-day access (Implementation). Assessment of program sustainability (Maintenance) was conducted by repeating this analysis for a second 6-month time period. Maintenance analyses results were similar to the earlier period. CONCLUSION: The addition of a highly partnered IF strategy to national level support resulted in greater Reach and Adoption of the mandated PC-MHI initiative, thereby increasing patient access to VA mental health care.
@article{
title = {Outcomes of a Partnered Facilitation Strategy to Implement Primary Care-Mental Health},
type = {article},
year = {2014},
identifiers = {[object Object]},
month = {10},
day = {30},
city = {VA Mental Health Quality Enhancement Research Initiative, North Little Rock, AR, USA, joann.kirchner@va.gov.},
id = {ef390aeb-5372-303b-8e25-5f4a60ff2621},
created = {2016-08-21T22:17:53.000Z},
file_attached = {false},
profile_id = {217ced55-4c79-38dc-838b-4b5ea8df5597},
group_id = {408d37d9-5f1b-3398-a9f5-5c1a487116d4},
last_modified = {2017-03-14T09:54:45.334Z},
read = {false},
starred = {false},
authored = {false},
confirmed = {true},
hidden = {false},
source_type = {JOUR},
notes = {ID: 74085; LR: 20141031; JID: 8605834; aheadofprint},
folder_uuids = {a237acd1-03cc-4528-a1f9-3f429ff289a2},
private_publication = {false},
abstract = {BACKGROUND: Implementing new programs and practices is challenging, even when they are mandated. Implementation Facilitation (IF) strategies that focus on partnering with sites show promise for addressing these challenges. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of an external/internal IF strategy within the context of a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) mandate of Primary Care-Mental Health Integration (PC-MHI). DESIGN: This was a quasi-experimental, Hybrid Type III study. Generalized estimating equations assessed differences across sites. PARTICIPANTS: Patients and providers at seven VA primary care clinics receiving the IF intervention and national support and seven matched comparison clinics receiving national support only participated in the study. INTERVENTION: We used a highly partnered IF strategy incorporating evidence-based implementation interventions. MAIN MEASURES: We evaluated the IF strategy using VA administrative data and RE-AIM framework measures for two 6-month periods. KEY RESULTS: Evaluation of RE-AIM measures from the first 6-month period indicated that PC patients at IF clinics had nine times the odds (OR=8.93, p<0.001) of also being seen in PC-MHI (Reach) compared to patients at non-IF clinics. PC providers at IF clinics had seven times the odds (OR=7.12, p=0.029) of referring patients to PC-MHI (Adoption) than providers at non-IF clinics, and a greater proportion of providers' patients at IF clinics were referred to PC-MHI (Adoption) compared to non-IF clinics (beta=0.027, p<0.001). Compared to PC patients at non-IF sites, patients at IF clinics did not have lower odds (OR=1.34, p=0.232) of being referred for first-time mental health specialty clinic visits (Effectiveness), or higher odds (OR=1.90, p=0.350) of receiving same-day access (Implementation). Assessment of program sustainability (Maintenance) was conducted by repeating this analysis for a second 6-month time period. Maintenance analyses results were similar to the earlier period. CONCLUSION: The addition of a highly partnered IF strategy to national level support resulted in greater Reach and Adoption of the mandated PC-MHI initiative, thereby increasing patient access to VA mental health care.},
bibtype = {article},
author = {Kirchner, J E and Ritchie, M J and Pitcock, J A and Parker, L E and Curran, G M and Fortney, J C},
journal = {Journal of general internal medicine}
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"cztkyDnmdWPMshJWk","bibbaseid":"kirchner-ritchie-pitcock-parker-curran-fortney-outcomesofapartneredfacilitationstrategytoimplementprimarycarementalhealth-2014","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2017-11-23T19:05:20.388Z","title":"Outcomes of a Partnered Facilitation Strategy to Implement Primary Care-Mental Health","author_short":["Kirchner, J., E.","Ritchie, M., J.","Pitcock, J., A.","Parker, L., E.","Curran, G., M.","Fortney, J., C."],"year":2014,"bibtype":"article","biburl":null,"bibdata":{"title":"Outcomes of a Partnered Facilitation Strategy to Implement Primary Care-Mental Health","type":"article","year":"2014","identifiers":"[object Object]","month":"10","day":"30","city":"VA Mental Health Quality Enhancement Research Initiative, North Little Rock, AR, USA, joann.kirchner@va.gov.","id":"ef390aeb-5372-303b-8e25-5f4a60ff2621","created":"2016-08-21T22:17:53.000Z","file_attached":false,"profile_id":"217ced55-4c79-38dc-838b-4b5ea8df5597","group_id":"408d37d9-5f1b-3398-a9f5-5c1a487116d4","last_modified":"2017-03-14T09:54:45.334Z","read":false,"starred":false,"authored":false,"confirmed":"true","hidden":false,"source_type":"JOUR","notes":"ID: 74085; LR: 20141031; JID: 8605834; aheadofprint","folder_uuids":"a237acd1-03cc-4528-a1f9-3f429ff289a2","private_publication":false,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Implementing new programs and practices is challenging, even when they are mandated. Implementation Facilitation (IF) strategies that focus on partnering with sites show promise for addressing these challenges. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of an external/internal IF strategy within the context of a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) mandate of Primary Care-Mental Health Integration (PC-MHI). DESIGN: This was a quasi-experimental, Hybrid Type III study. Generalized estimating equations assessed differences across sites. PARTICIPANTS: Patients and providers at seven VA primary care clinics receiving the IF intervention and national support and seven matched comparison clinics receiving national support only participated in the study. INTERVENTION: We used a highly partnered IF strategy incorporating evidence-based implementation interventions. MAIN MEASURES: We evaluated the IF strategy using VA administrative data and RE-AIM framework measures for two 6-month periods. KEY RESULTS: Evaluation of RE-AIM measures from the first 6-month period indicated that PC patients at IF clinics had nine times the odds (OR=8.93, p<0.001) of also being seen in PC-MHI (Reach) compared to patients at non-IF clinics. PC providers at IF clinics had seven times the odds (OR=7.12, p=0.029) of referring patients to PC-MHI (Adoption) than providers at non-IF clinics, and a greater proportion of providers' patients at IF clinics were referred to PC-MHI (Adoption) compared to non-IF clinics (beta=0.027, p<0.001). Compared to PC patients at non-IF sites, patients at IF clinics did not have lower odds (OR=1.34, p=0.232) of being referred for first-time mental health specialty clinic visits (Effectiveness), or higher odds (OR=1.90, p=0.350) of receiving same-day access (Implementation). Assessment of program sustainability (Maintenance) was conducted by repeating this analysis for a second 6-month time period. Maintenance analyses results were similar to the earlier period. CONCLUSION: The addition of a highly partnered IF strategy to national level support resulted in greater Reach and Adoption of the mandated PC-MHI initiative, thereby increasing patient access to VA mental health care.","bibtype":"article","author":"Kirchner, J E and Ritchie, M J and Pitcock, J A and Parker, L E and Curran, G M and Fortney, J C","journal":"Journal of general internal medicine","bibtex":"@article{\n title = {Outcomes of a Partnered Facilitation Strategy to Implement Primary Care-Mental Health},\n type = {article},\n year = {2014},\n identifiers = {[object Object]},\n month = {10},\n day = {30},\n city = {VA Mental Health Quality Enhancement Research Initiative, North Little Rock, AR, USA, joann.kirchner@va.gov.},\n id = {ef390aeb-5372-303b-8e25-5f4a60ff2621},\n created = {2016-08-21T22:17:53.000Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {217ced55-4c79-38dc-838b-4b5ea8df5597},\n group_id = {408d37d9-5f1b-3398-a9f5-5c1a487116d4},\n last_modified = {2017-03-14T09:54:45.334Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n source_type = {JOUR},\n notes = {ID: 74085; LR: 20141031; JID: 8605834; aheadofprint},\n folder_uuids = {a237acd1-03cc-4528-a1f9-3f429ff289a2},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {BACKGROUND: Implementing new programs and practices is challenging, even when they are mandated. Implementation Facilitation (IF) strategies that focus on partnering with sites show promise for addressing these challenges. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of an external/internal IF strategy within the context of a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) mandate of Primary Care-Mental Health Integration (PC-MHI). DESIGN: This was a quasi-experimental, Hybrid Type III study. Generalized estimating equations assessed differences across sites. PARTICIPANTS: Patients and providers at seven VA primary care clinics receiving the IF intervention and national support and seven matched comparison clinics receiving national support only participated in the study. INTERVENTION: We used a highly partnered IF strategy incorporating evidence-based implementation interventions. MAIN MEASURES: We evaluated the IF strategy using VA administrative data and RE-AIM framework measures for two 6-month periods. KEY RESULTS: Evaluation of RE-AIM measures from the first 6-month period indicated that PC patients at IF clinics had nine times the odds (OR=8.93, p<0.001) of also being seen in PC-MHI (Reach) compared to patients at non-IF clinics. PC providers at IF clinics had seven times the odds (OR=7.12, p=0.029) of referring patients to PC-MHI (Adoption) than providers at non-IF clinics, and a greater proportion of providers' patients at IF clinics were referred to PC-MHI (Adoption) compared to non-IF clinics (beta=0.027, p<0.001). Compared to PC patients at non-IF sites, patients at IF clinics did not have lower odds (OR=1.34, p=0.232) of being referred for first-time mental health specialty clinic visits (Effectiveness), or higher odds (OR=1.90, p=0.350) of receiving same-day access (Implementation). Assessment of program sustainability (Maintenance) was conducted by repeating this analysis for a second 6-month time period. Maintenance analyses results were similar to the earlier period. CONCLUSION: The addition of a highly partnered IF strategy to national level support resulted in greater Reach and Adoption of the mandated PC-MHI initiative, thereby increasing patient access to VA mental health care.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Kirchner, J E and Ritchie, M J and Pitcock, J A and Parker, L E and Curran, G M and Fortney, J C},\n journal = {Journal of general internal medicine}\n}","author_short":["Kirchner, J., E.","Ritchie, M., J.","Pitcock, J., A.","Parker, L., E.","Curran, G., M.","Fortney, J., C."],"bibbaseid":"kirchner-ritchie-pitcock-parker-curran-fortney-outcomesofapartneredfacilitationstrategytoimplementprimarycarementalhealth-2014","role":"author","urls":{},"downloads":0},"search_terms":["outcomes","partnered","facilitation","strategy","implement","primary","care","mental","health","kirchner","ritchie","pitcock","parker","curran","fortney"],"keywords":[],"authorIDs":[]}