@article{
 title = {Water quality factors affecting bromate reduction in biologically active carbon filters},
 type = {article},
 year = {2001},
 identifiers = {[object Object]},
 pages = {891-900},
 volume = {35},
 month = {3},
 id = {1fb589ca-99d5-377f-8bcb-6f7891b2bd22},
 created = {2016-04-28T08:46:12.000Z},
 file_attached = {false},
 profile_id = {dce7c6b2-57cf-350f-b364-3e8ed99bb344},
 group_id = {bfd80d76-e42d-36f1-b5b9-353e1a47eb95},
 last_modified = {2016-04-28T08:46:12.000Z},
 read = {false},
 starred = {false},
 authored = {false},
 confirmed = {true},
 hidden = {false},
 citation_key = {ISI:000167033400005},
 source_type = {article},
 abstract = {Biological removal of the ozonation by-product, bromate, was
demonstrated in biologically active carbon (BAC) filters. For example,
with a 20-min EBCT, pH 7.5, and influent dissolved oxygen (DO) and
nitrate concentrations 2.1 and 5.1 mg/l, respectively, 40% bromate
removal was obtained with a 20 mug/l influent bromate concentration. In
this study, DO, nitrate and sulfate concentrations, pH, and type of
source water were evaluated for their effect on bromate removal in a
BAC filter. Bromate removal decreased as the influent concentrations of
DO and nitrate increased, but bromate removal was observed in the
presence of measurable effluent concentrations of DO and nitrate. In
contrast, bromate removal was not sensitive to the influent sulfate
concentration, with only a slight reduction in bromate removal as the
influent sulfate concentration was increased from 11.1 to 102.7 mg/l.
Bromate reduction was better at lower pH values (6.8 and 7.2) than at
higher pH values (7.5 and 8.2), suggesting that it may be possible to
reduce bromate formation during ozonation and increase biological
bromate reduction through pH control. Biological bromate removal in
Lake Michigan water was very poor as compared to that in tapwater from
a groundwater source. Bromate removal improved when sufficient organic
electron donor was added to remove the nitrate and DO present in the
Lake Michigan water, indicating that the poor biodegradability of the
natural organic matter may have been limiting bromate removal in that
water. Biological bromate removal was demonstrated to be a sustainable
process under a variety of water quality conditions, and bromate
removal can be improved by controlling key water quality parameters.
(C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.},
 bibtype = {article},
 author = {Kirisits, M J and Snoeyink, V L and Inan, H and Chee-Sanford, J C and Raskin, L and Brown, J C},
 journal = {WATER RESEARCH},
 number = {4}
}

{"_id":"XY62AGuEkHtRo8Hpp","bibbaseid":"kirisits-snoeyink-inan-cheesanford-raskin-brown-waterqualityfactorsaffectingbromatereductioninbiologicallyactivecarbonfilters-2001","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2016-04-28T08:42:22.760Z","title":"Water quality factors affecting bromate reduction in biologically active carbon filters","author_short":["Kirisits, M., J.","Snoeyink, V., L.","Inan, H.","Chee-Sanford, J., C.","Raskin, L.","Brown, J., C."],"year":2001,"bibtype":"article","biburl":null,"bibdata":{"title":"Water quality factors affecting bromate reduction in biologically active carbon filters","type":"article","year":"2001","identifiers":"[object Object]","pages":"891-900","volume":"35","month":"3","id":"1fb589ca-99d5-377f-8bcb-6f7891b2bd22","created":"2016-04-28T08:46:12.000Z","file_attached":false,"profile_id":"dce7c6b2-57cf-350f-b364-3e8ed99bb344","group_id":"bfd80d76-e42d-36f1-b5b9-353e1a47eb95","last_modified":"2016-04-28T08:46:12.000Z","read":false,"starred":false,"authored":false,"confirmed":"true","hidden":false,"citation_key":"ISI:000167033400005","source_type":"article","abstract":"Biological removal of the ozonation by-product, bromate, was\ndemonstrated in biologically active carbon (BAC) filters. For example,\nwith a 20-min EBCT, pH 7.5, and influent dissolved oxygen (DO) and\nnitrate concentrations 2.1 and 5.1 mg/l, respectively, 40% bromate\nremoval was obtained with a 20 mug/l influent bromate concentration. In\nthis study, DO, nitrate and sulfate concentrations, pH, and type of\nsource water were evaluated for their effect on bromate removal in a\nBAC filter. Bromate removal decreased as the influent concentrations of\nDO and nitrate increased, but bromate removal was observed in the\npresence of measurable effluent concentrations of DO and nitrate. In\ncontrast, bromate removal was not sensitive to the influent sulfate\nconcentration, with only a slight reduction in bromate removal as the\ninfluent sulfate concentration was increased from 11.1 to 102.7 mg/l.\nBromate reduction was better at lower pH values (6.8 and 7.2) than at\nhigher pH values (7.5 and 8.2), suggesting that it may be possible to\nreduce bromate formation during ozonation and increase biological\nbromate reduction through pH control. Biological bromate removal in\nLake Michigan water was very poor as compared to that in tapwater from\na groundwater source. Bromate removal improved when sufficient organic\nelectron donor was added to remove the nitrate and DO present in the\nLake Michigan water, indicating that the poor biodegradability of the\nnatural organic matter may have been limiting bromate removal in that\nwater. Biological bromate removal was demonstrated to be a sustainable\nprocess under a variety of water quality conditions, and bromate\nremoval can be improved by controlling key water quality parameters.\n(C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.","bibtype":"article","author":"Kirisits, M J and Snoeyink, V L and Inan, H and Chee-Sanford, J C and Raskin, L and Brown, J C","journal":"WATER RESEARCH","number":"4","bibtex":"@article{\n title = {Water quality factors affecting bromate reduction in biologically active carbon filters},\n type = {article},\n year = {2001},\n identifiers = {[object Object]},\n pages = {891-900},\n volume = {35},\n month = {3},\n id = {1fb589ca-99d5-377f-8bcb-6f7891b2bd22},\n created = {2016-04-28T08:46:12.000Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {dce7c6b2-57cf-350f-b364-3e8ed99bb344},\n group_id = {bfd80d76-e42d-36f1-b5b9-353e1a47eb95},\n last_modified = {2016-04-28T08:46:12.000Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n citation_key = {ISI:000167033400005},\n source_type = {article},\n abstract = {Biological removal of the ozonation by-product, bromate, was\ndemonstrated in biologically active carbon (BAC) filters. For example,\nwith a 20-min EBCT, pH 7.5, and influent dissolved oxygen (DO) and\nnitrate concentrations 2.1 and 5.1 mg/l, respectively, 40% bromate\nremoval was obtained with a 20 mug/l influent bromate concentration. In\nthis study, DO, nitrate and sulfate concentrations, pH, and type of\nsource water were evaluated for their effect on bromate removal in a\nBAC filter. Bromate removal decreased as the influent concentrations of\nDO and nitrate increased, but bromate removal was observed in the\npresence of measurable effluent concentrations of DO and nitrate. In\ncontrast, bromate removal was not sensitive to the influent sulfate\nconcentration, with only a slight reduction in bromate removal as the\ninfluent sulfate concentration was increased from 11.1 to 102.7 mg/l.\nBromate reduction was better at lower pH values (6.8 and 7.2) than at\nhigher pH values (7.5 and 8.2), suggesting that it may be possible to\nreduce bromate formation during ozonation and increase biological\nbromate reduction through pH control. Biological bromate removal in\nLake Michigan water was very poor as compared to that in tapwater from\na groundwater source. Bromate removal improved when sufficient organic\nelectron donor was added to remove the nitrate and DO present in the\nLake Michigan water, indicating that the poor biodegradability of the\nnatural organic matter may have been limiting bromate removal in that\nwater. Biological bromate removal was demonstrated to be a sustainable\nprocess under a variety of water quality conditions, and bromate\nremoval can be improved by controlling key water quality parameters.\n(C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Kirisits, M J and Snoeyink, V L and Inan, H and Chee-Sanford, J C and Raskin, L and Brown, J C},\n journal = {WATER RESEARCH},\n number = {4}\n}","author_short":["Kirisits, M., J.","Snoeyink, V., L.","Inan, H.","Chee-Sanford, J., C.","Raskin, L.","Brown, J., C."],"bibbaseid":"kirisits-snoeyink-inan-cheesanford-raskin-brown-waterqualityfactorsaffectingbromatereductioninbiologicallyactivecarbonfilters-2001","role":"author","urls":{},"downloads":0,"html":""},"search_terms":["water","quality","factors","affecting","bromate","reduction","biologically","active","carbon","filters","kirisits","snoeyink","inan","chee-sanford","raskin","brown"],"keywords":[],"authorIDs":[]}