Innovating european nature conservation law by introducing ecosystem services. Kistenkas, F. H. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 23(2):88 – 92, Oekom Verlag, 2014. Cited by: 7
Innovating european nature conservation law by introducing ecosystem services [link]Paper  doi  abstract   bibtex   
Whereas the importance of the concept of ecosystem services is growing ever stronger in other scientific disci plines, law discourse does not seem to be very aware of it. As this paper advocates, EU nature conserva tion law would greatly profit from adopting the concept of ecosystem services, thus giving more weight to sustainable development demands. Instead, the European Court of Justice recently lost some momen tum. Although it easily could have adopted the concept into the Natura 2000 appropriate assessment, the court fell back on a rigid application of limited conservation objectives. © 2014 F.H.Kistenkas; licensee oekom verlag.
@ARTICLE{Kistenkas201488,
	author = {Kistenkas, Frederik H.},
	title = {Innovating european nature conservation law by introducing ecosystem services},
	year = {2014},
	journal = {GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society},
	volume = {23},
	number = {2},
	pages = {88 – 92},
	doi = {10.14512/gaia.23.2.5},
	url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84904018520&doi=10.14512%2fgaia.23.2.5&partnerID=40&md5=f199c38606f44f6404a57ee0d03bf7a8},
	affiliations = {Forest and Nature Conservation Policy Group (FNP), Alterra Research Institute, Wageningen University and Research Centre, 6700 AA Wageningen, P.O. Box 47, Netherlands},
	abstract = {Whereas the importance of the concept of ecosystem services is growing ever stronger in other scientific disci plines, law discourse does not seem to be very aware of it. As this paper advocates, EU nature conserva tion law would greatly profit from adopting the concept of ecosystem services, thus giving more weight to sustainable development demands. Instead, the European Court of Justice recently lost some momen tum. Although it easily could have adopted the concept into the Natura 2000 appropriate assessment, the court fell back on a rigid application of limited conservation objectives. © 2014 F.H.Kistenkas; licensee oekom verlag.},
	author_keywords = {Ecosystem services; European law; Green infrastructure; Habitats assessment; Natura 2000; Nature conservation law; Sustainable development},
	correspondence_address = {F.H. Kistenkas; Forest and Nature Conservation Policy Group (FNP), Alterra Research Institute, Wageningen University and Research Centre, 6700 AA Wageningen, P.O. Box 47, Netherlands; email: fred.kistenkas@wur.nl},
	publisher = {Oekom Verlag},
	issn = {09405550},
	language = {English},
	abbrev_source_title = {GAIA},
	type = {Review},
	publication_stage = {Final},
	source = {Scopus},
	note = {Cited by: 7}
}

Downloads: 0